- Oct 24, 2015
- 116
Nope. There will be no conflicts although I had to white-list MalwareTips on adguard because it blocked me from replying to posts here.Thanks AlphaBetaBut if both are running there will not be any conflict or issue ?
Nope. There will be no conflicts although I had to white-list MalwareTips on adguard because it blocked me from replying to posts here.Thanks AlphaBetaBut if both are running there will not be any conflict or issue ?
Nope. There will be no conflicts although I had to white-list MalwareTips on adguard because it blocked me from replying to posts here.
The second segment of my statement still stands, adding too many filters can affect browsing performance.![]()
Definitely not. The reply function was definitely blocked by adguard for some reason.Are you joking ?![]()
Definitely not. The reply function was definitely blocked by adguard for some reason.
Check the help pages on AdBlock Plus, or even uBlock Origin.With uBlock Origin the difference is negligible...
Of course, the more filters enabled, the higher the memory footprint. Yet, even after adding Fanboy's two extra lists, hpHosts’s Ad and tracking servers, uBlock Origin still has a lower memory footprint than other very popular blockers out there.
Also, be aware that selecting some of these extra lists may lead to higher likelihood of web site breakage -- especially those lists which are normally used as hosts file.
Thanks AlphaBetaBut if both are running there will not be any conflict or issue ?
I think they don't improve anything. They just play with the same filters (if you add all common Adguard filters into ublock)
Do you think that using µBlock Origin + Adguard Windows could be to improve filtering ?
You guys were talking about sandboxing browsers in this thread, have read before as well, does it clears cookies & other information as well once you exit sandbox?
Definitely not. The reply function was definitely blocked by adguard for some reason.
Check the help pages on AdBlock Plus, or even uBlock Origin.
Using Adguard (the soft) and don't have any issue with MT.
I know the efficiency of uBlock, as I have tested it before - probably about a year ago. I was stating what was written from their Description. No need to be hostile.Once again, the difference is negligible with uBlock Origin. The problem gets to be a problem with AdBlock Plus because of the way it handles the lists. And depending on the type of hardware you're running could also be no problem.
It's funny you bring out the wiki pages of uBlock when we also have this: uBlock vs. ABP: efficiency compared · gorhill/uBlock Wiki · GitHub
I know the efficiency of uBlock, as I have tested it before - probably about a year ago. I was stating what was written from their Description. No need to be hostile.
Hello,
I'm trying Adguard (soft) free (15 days) trial.
Can someone explain to me what is "stealth mode" ?
Is it worth it to enable it ?
Thanks.
The major difference between Stealth Mode and popular blockers like ABP, Adguard, Ghostery and others, is that it takes a completely different approach to achieving online privacy. It doesn’t physically block all the trackers. Instead, Stealth Mode simply prevents them from collecting any information. This turns into an advantage, because since all cookies and ETags are being blocked, even if a tracker has not been added to the database yet, it still won’t be able to get any information, making Stealth Mode a more reliable solution.