Just to clarify what I meant earlier when I said “no real expertise,” I wasn’t saying the project is trash or that the developer is clueless. I meant the domain expertise may not be there for the specific tool being built. The Photocraft developer is reportedly a software engineer with around 15 years of experience, and I respect that. But being a experienced software engineer is not the same as being an expert in multimedia, image editing, color pipelines, file formats, performance optimization for graphics, etc.
So my point was AI assisted development can produce something impressive quickly, but for complex tools like a Photoshop alternative, it will likely take time to stabilize, may have bugs, and needs real domain knowledge and testing to mature. The Craft ecosystem is still alpha stage, so that’s expected. I’m not calling it trash I’m saying don’t expect Excel/Photoshop-level maturity yet, and AI coded usually means more iteration and bug-fixing before it’s reliable.