- Mar 29, 2018
- 7,698
Yes, I run only MS Defender with built-in SAC on.Would any of you run an AV only and nothing else?
Yes, I run only MS Defender with built-in SAC on.Would any of you run an AV only and nothing else?
That's fine and dandy but probably 75 % of computer users don't know or care. Maybe, just maybe, if some of them come to this forum, accidently or on purpose, they might learn something. And as per usual, if someone does not like a thread then just don't post in it.Subjective meaning of others opinions not facts. If we place fact, there is no best, they all have good and bad days and can be bypassed, although, and it comes down to this, that's negated with habits not with piling on more.
Everytime one of these threads are created it turns into "this is my favorite." Which is as I stated "subjective"
Personally I find being attentive in our surroundings on the net with good habits is better any day then waiting until the product screams, you were infected, I cleaned it up, but broke the files it was associated with, now your system is unstable, oh and they took a bunch of your info before I shut it down, and the C&C server nows has your address.
More focus is placed in products than what needs to be, almost like a PR department. See my point.
Cool then maybe the "i like norton or kasperky" response can put why or how its the "best: standalone so users can learn from this. Its all i see is users stating i like a product. Thats not teaching, its confusing at best for someone looking to learn about security.That's fine and dandy but probably 75 % of computer users don't know or care. Maybe, just maybe, if some of them come to this forum, accidently or on purpose, they might learn something. And as per usual, if someone does not like a thread then just don't post in it.
False! Blanket statements are pointless. Solutions and layers vary based on factors like features, efficacy, false positives, performance, compatibility, usability, user type, and usage. The user affects the efficiency, advantages, and disadvantages of both approaches.Reality is that Antivirus (Internet Security) software are ineffective.
A layered approach is superior.
A standalone Antivirus cannot provide OS updates, block ads and trackers, prevent phishing attempts, or restore data.False! Blanket statements are pointless. Solutions and layers vary based on factors like features, efficacy, false positives, performance, compatibility, usability, user type, and usage. The user affects the efficiency, advantages, and disadvantages of both approaches.
how do I (& others with functioning but older hardware) avoid win10, run Linux? (I can & sometimes do run Linux -- is it impossible for MS to make win11 more compatible with older but solid hardware??Avoid:
- Windows 10 or older
My desktop is 11 years old, I have no choice but to run W10 until I get a new one. And in no way do I feel unsafe, now if we're talking W7 or 8.....how do I (& others with functioning but older hardware) avoid win10, run Linux? (I can & sometimes do run Linux -- is it impossible for MS to make win11 more compatible with older but solid hardware??
Im not sure why that was posted as well, windows 10 will still receive new features and bug fixes, security updates until 2025. Windows 10 being older will be more stable as they continue to iron out bugs of windows 11.how do I (& others with functioning but older hardware) avoid win10, run Linux? (I can & sometimes do run Linux -- is it impossible for MS to make win11 more compatible with older but solid hardware??
Im not sure why that was posted as well, windows 10 will still receive new features and bug fixes, security updates until 2025. Windows 10 being older will be more stable as they continue to iron out bugs of windows 11.
It was hard for me not to say, just do it already, linux, yes please lol
OS updates and restoration features from an antivirus? Seriously? How about including PDF, Office, as well as an OS? This comment of yours is just an excessive attempt to rationalize your previous comment.A standalone Antivirus cannot provide OS updates, block ads and trackers, prevent phishing attempts, or restore data.
Millions of iOS users don’t have the "safety of an Antivirus", yet are better off than most Windows infected users who spend hundreds of dollars on an Antivirus with nothing to show for it.
Windows 10 is an actively supported OS with critical and security updates, ensuring its security is on par with or better than Windows 11, as Windows 10 is more stable.how do I (& others with functioning but older hardware) avoid win10, run Linux? (I can & sometimes do run Linux -- is it impossible for MS to make win11 more compatible with older but solid hardware??
Bravo!.. Your talent for mocking and making fun of the less fortunate souls who call Tunnel their home!Plus the Kaspersky bear is cute (not like TunnelBear)
I experimented with the most recent ESET release. I wanted to test the "Essential" version, but they only offer the Premium one. ESET defaults, in my experience, are adequate but not strong. The usability of HIPS, or firewall, still lacks improvements or safe lists. Setting Firewall and HIPS to "interactive" mode is the simplest configuration to enhance ESET's protection. Dealing with interactive mode is a nightmare! Effectively using HIPS requires effort and work to configure it. If you're comfortable with HIPS configuration and know how to use it, ESET standalone can provide powerful protection.I guess maybe not seeing that you are using it now along with Cyberlock. But would you use it without CL?
You can upgrade to Windows 11 if you use Microsoft's workaround. But there's no real need to, as Windows 10 gets security updates for two more years.My desktop is 11 years old, I have no choice but to run W10 until I get a new one. And in no way do I feel unsafe, now if we're talking W7 or 8.....
In my experience Windows 11 is just as stable as Windows 10. Microsoft claim that it is more stable than Windows 10, if you run it on supported hardware. But I'm running it on ten year old hardware.Windows 10 is an actively supported OS with critical and security updates, ensuring its security is on par with or better than Windows 11, as Windows 10 is more stable.
Ive had more problems using bitdefender than g-data, adguard didnt even work with bitdefenderG-Data uses more ram than Bitdefender in my case. One might as well go with Bitdefender or Emsisoft instead.
That is the reason I used Panda, it had a cute systray icon, once removed I switched to Kaspersky for the icon. AV companies underestimate what users really want, it is not the protection.Plus the Kaspersky bear is cute
I discuss that with all due respect, Mr. Administrator. Apple people don't use antivirus because their system is less used than Android. Android has much more users than IOS, therefore all malware focuses on attacking it, not because IOS has better security than Android.A standalone Antivirus cannot provide OS updates, block ads and trackers, prevent phishing attempts, or restore data.
Millions of iOS users don’t have the "safety of an Antivirus", yet are better off than most Windows infected users who spend hundreds of dollars on an Antivirus with nothing to show for it.