Serious Discussion Which AV from a privacy respecting perspective ??

Vitali Ortzi

Level 30
Verified
Top Poster
Well-known
Dec 12, 2016
1,903
AVs by default go against respecting privacy because they have to be intrusive.

If you want to avoid that, then you will have to take on the role of an AV. That is, at best the AV downloads signatures and some means to detect unusual behavior. If it can't explain something that happens and is not allowed to go online, then it will inform you, the user. From there, you have to go over the logs and see what is taking place, and from there figure out what to delete or quarantine, and so on.

It's like that news about repair people viewing personal data and even copying them:




If you want to avoid that, and if they can bypass passwords by, for example, loading the device using another system, and then from there access the protected folders, then you'll have to backup the drive and factory-reset the device or have the drive or storage pulled out and given to you before they start repairing the machine.

And if it's a software problem then they'll have to repair the device in front of you, or something like that.

I think only enterprise products configured to be run isolated are truly privacy friendly
One I would recommend as it has really good behavior blocker is Symantec

Although if you don't have an issue allowing some data collection you could benefit a lot and it does generally collect less data then gen digitalsome vendors

If you uncheck the telemetry
 

badboy

Level 1
Jan 20, 2025
39
In case people are wondering, FSB stands for "Fantastic Security Brand"! 😊
If anyone is interested, FSB stands for Federal Security Service (transcription: Federalnaya Sluzhba Bezopasnosti or on cyrylic: Федеральная Служба Безопасности). Analogous to the FBI. :)
 
Last edited:

badboy

Level 1
Jan 20, 2025
39
I like what you say about paying attention and choosing who to trust. That is solid advice that more need to hear!

I don't agree with some of the messaging in the world these days that we have already lost our privacy and that there is not much we can do. There are reasonable mitigations to significantly reduce many of the privacy threats that have been brought up so far.

Again, I do not see it as a black and white thing - as if you either have privacy or you don't. I feel like in today's technology landscape, a lot of people have just traded privacy for convenience, then rationalized the decision. But many of the mitigations are not even that difficult.

My friends, have faith. Keep fighting!


I agree with you. What I meant was that you don't have to get completely paranoid about it. You just need to keep information hygiene as much as possible, but don't spoil your enjoyment of modern technology. :)
 

simmerskool

Level 40
Verified
Top Poster
Well-known
Apr 16, 2017
2,913
Liveguard actually puts the malware inside a sandbox and emulates it in the cloud so it's far more advanced then livegrid and comparable to what zonealarm does as checkpoint has a similar technology called threat emulation



Actually that's one of the reasons I really love checkpoint and eset as I believe cloud emulation is an important layer
based on my personal experience, Harmony's threat emulation is superior to ESET's LiveGuard, although my experience with LiveGuard is dated by 12 to 18 months...
 

About us

  • MalwareTips is a community-driven platform providing the latest information and resources on malware and cyber threats. Our team of experienced professionals and passionate volunteers work to keep the internet safe and secure. We provide accurate, up-to-date information and strive to build a strong and supportive community dedicated to cybersecurity.

User Menu

Follow us

Follow us on Facebook or Twitter to know first about the latest cybersecurity incidents and malware threats.

Top