Typical of intelligence operations. So who was it? I wouldn't actually put it past the NSA or CIA to do this to be honest, the intelligence boon would be huge. But they sure do love their watering holes from the looks of it. They're goal doesn't appear to have been malicious damage, rather to compromise internal structures of specific firms.. You know, like how the CIA worked hard to compromise Cisco through the supply chain, etc...
- Status
Typical of intelligence operations. So who was it? I wouldn't actually put it past the NSA or CIA to do this to be honest, the intelligence boon would be huge. But they sure do love their watering holes from the looks of it. They're goal doesn't appear to have been malicious damage, rather to compromise internal structures of specific firms.. You know, like how the CIA worked hard to compromise Cisco through the supply chain, etc...
According to VirusTotal, Quick Heal, SUPERAntiSpyware and Vipre, still don't detect it. Of course, VT results are not always the same as if you had these antiviruses install on your system.
- Apr 28, 2015
- 271
Guess we'll just have to sue you when we get infected, cos you knew!
- Jul 16, 2014
- 215
But, that is the scan result for the original installer. The file has been renamed, but you can see from the scan results with the original filename, it is the same file.
Antivirus scan for 1a4a5123d7b2c534cb3e3168f7032cf9ebf38b9a2a97226d0fdb7933cf6030ff at 2017-10-04 09:46:53 UTC - VirusTotal
- Status
Similar threads
