App Review CIS Proactive Config Review (HIPS Disabled)

  • Thread starter Thread starter yigido
  • Start date Start date
It is advised to take all reviews with a grain of salt. In extreme cases some reviews use dramatization for entertainment purposes.
That's why using CIS with a local scanner is rather pointless. The strength of Comodo is in the Auto-sandboxing feature and to a lesser extent the firewall (the HIPS and AV are superfluous), so CF is more than enough.

Also, I think that this is the first Comodo Video where the product was used correctly (compliments to Yigido).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Moose, tonibalas, jamescv7 and 4 others
cruelsister said:
That's why using CIS with a local scanner is rather pointless. The strength of Comodo is in the Auto-sandboxing feature and to a lesser extent the firewall (the HIPS and AV are superfluous), so CF is more than enough.

Also, I think that this is the first Comodo Video where the product was used correctly (compliments to Yigido).
Click to expand...
Thank you @cruelsister ;) This shows how people should use, I do not know how people can infect themselves while using CIS.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SD-ahmad and illumination
Yes I agree with cruelsister but CIS and FW are equally difficult tako why not use the CIS
 
David- CIS and CF are identical except for the presence of a Local AV scanner being included in CIS. Remember that both products have a Cloud AV.

So essentially the only difference between the two is that you can do an on-demand AV scan of the computer with CIS. Keeping in mind that currently Comodo's definitions just aren't as good as other products, why bother with it? You are better off using CF and keeping Malwarebytes Free on hand for whenever you want to scan your computer.
 
  • Like
Reactions: yigido
That's the main signature from CIS, their HIPS/BB/Firewall/Autosandbox makes everything fully work on flaw and everything were dependent if signatures are bypass already and in such powerful features, needs to be handle very well by an experience users.
 
  • Like
Reactions: yigido
I only use CF but this review is the only one I've seen similar to how I have it configured. Thanks for a good test.
 
  • Like
Reactions: yigido
cruelsister said:
That's why using CIS with a local scanner is rather pointless. The strength of Comodo is in the Auto-sandboxing feature and to a lesser extent the firewall (the HIPS and AV are superfluous), so CF is more than enough.

Also, I think that this is the first Comodo Video where the product was used correctly (compliments to Yigido).
Click to expand...
i think Comodo should go for something like smart/optimal local database & full databases on the cloud.
This will cut down on the size of the databases a lot.
And true to as they say, their product is protection based.
 
yigido said:
I do not know how people can infect themselves while using CIS.
Click to expand...
By clicking ALLOW:p:D
If the new antivirus engine is good then Comodo will step up a level;) and if they improve HIPS then Comodo will be a top software.
And the best part is free:)
Very good review yigido and keep up the hard work;):)
 
  • Like
Reactions: yigido
cruelsister said:
David- CIS and CF are identical except for the presence of a Local AV scanner being included in CIS. Remember that both products have a Cloud AV.

So essentially the only difference between the two is that you can do an on-demand AV scan of the computer with CIS. Keeping in mind that currently Comodo's definitions just aren't as good as other products, why bother with it? You are better off using CF and keeping Malwarebytes Free on hand for whenever you want to scan your computer.
Click to expand...
Hello
If you have Comodo Firewall installed, you will still need an antivirus on your computer. While Comodo Firewall has a cloud based behavior analysis system which can detect zero-day malware, it does not have any antivirus definitions or heuristic analysis capabilities.
Comodo Firewall is good product, however I would still recommend that you also install the Comodo Antivirus alongside this product.
 
tonibalas said:
By clicking ALLOW
Click to expand...

Toni- you bring up an EXCELLENT point. There are those that can't be trusted to make a correct decision (usually men). With version 8 of Comodo, it can be setup so that no popups are shown at all- the default action is implemented automatically. Basically a no-brainer for no brainers.

Regarding the promised new AV engine, unless it comes concurrently with an improved method of scanning the web and identifying malware as well as increasing current personnel to feed definitions into it I can't be too enthusiastic yet (but again I really am not a fan of traditional AV's anyway).
 
  • Like
Reactions: tonibalas
What is the difference between default & proactive settings if HIPS is disabled on proactive too?
 
cruelsister About the new engine i totally agree with you, this is a good way of improving the software's performance.

About AV's i am in the opposite position from you, i like more av's and not firewall's because most of the time third party firewall's need user's interaction.
So at the moment i am staying with Windows firewall which has minimum alerts;)
 
tonibalas said:
So at the moment i am staying with Windows firewall which has minimum alerts;)
Click to expand...

Windows Firewall - that's all you're very likely to ever need.

Maybe take a look at BiniSoft Windows Firewall Control.

$10, Lifetime license, unlimited installations...

Monitor outbound WF connections... in the beginning there can be a bunch of alerts, but that calms down in a short while after configuring.

It is a whale of a deal.

It works. Oh yes, indeed it does. :D
 
  • Like
Reactions: yigido and tonibalas
hjlbx said:
Windows Firewall - that's all you're very likely to ever need
Click to expand...

I could not disagree more strongly with that statement. Assume that you run across a true zero day malware for which no AV definitions exist (and I would hope that you agree that no AV scanner is 100%). Assume further that the malware is a keylogger or downloader or worm. All of these to fulfill its malicious purpose needs to connect to the malware server. A Firewall with Outbound alerts will give you a chance to stop it; Windows firewall will not.

Please trust me on this- no matter what Firewall you choose, just make sure it is aware of Outbound Traffic.
 
  • Like
Reactions: yigido and tonibalas
cruelsister said:
I could not disagree more strongly with that statement. Assume that you run across a true zero day malware for which no AV definitions exist (and I would hope that you agree that no AV scanner is 100%). Assume further that the malware is a keylogger or downloader or worm. All of these to fulfill its malicious purpose needs to connect to the malware server. A Firewall with Outbound alerts will give you a chance to stop it; Windows firewall will not.

Please trust me on this- no matter what Firewall you choose, just make sure it is aware of Outbound Traffic.
Click to expand...

Hello cruelsister,

I could not agree with you more...that is why I recommended BiniSoft Windows Firewall Control since its purpose is to add outbound notifications (paid version only).
 
  • Like
Reactions: tonibalas

You may also like...