Advice Request CleanBrowsing DNS vs NextDNS vs ControlD DNS

[The_King]

I am still using Simple DNScrypt windows client because its system level DNS blocking not just limited to the browser. Highly customizable.

Last updated 2023 but that does not bother me because its just a GUi for DNSproxy which can be updated manually. If anyone is interested in giving it a try.

GitHub - instantsc/SimpleDnsCrypt: A simple management tool for dnscrypt-proxy

A simple management tool for dnscrypt-proxy. Contribute to instantsc/SimpleDnsCrypt development by creating an account on GitHub.

github.com

Latest version of DNSproxy Updated reguarly

GitHub - DNSCrypt/dnscrypt-proxy: dnscrypt-proxy 2 - A flexible DNS proxy, with support for encrypted DNS protocols.

dnscrypt-proxy 2 - A flexible DNS proxy, with support for encrypted DNS protocols. - DNSCrypt/dnscrypt-proxy

github.com

Comes with 290 reslovers all the popular ones NextDNS, Adguard, Qua9, Mullvad etc...

 

[blackice]

Something to note about the speed of DNS servers. Unless the ping is over 100, you shouldn’t notice much. There’s a lot of caching involved with DNS. The bigger issue is which servers they point you to as anycast doesn’t always get you to the most optimal servers. Quad9 regularly sends me to servers on the other side of the country for streaming services which ends up leading to more buffering. The peering servers inside my ISP are very close and fast, but I don’t hit them if I don’t use the ISP DNS. Quad9 is just an example, I actually like their service, but there’s more to routing than just DNS.

 

[Marko :)]

Something to note about the speed of DNS servers. Unless the ping is over 100, you shouldn’t notice much. There’s a lot of caching involved with DNS. The bigger issue is which servers they point you to as anycast doesn’t always get you to the most optimal servers. Quad9 regularly sends me to servers on the other side of the country for streaming services which ends up leading to more buffering. The peering servers inside my ISP are very close and fast, but I don’t hit them if I don’t use the ISP DNS. Quad9 is just an example, I actually like their service, but there’s more to routing than just DNS.

I found 1.1.1.1 to be the most reliable regarding this as Cloudflare has servers in pretty much every corner of the world.

 

[SeriousHoax]

I am still using Simple DNScrypt windows client because its system level DNS blocking not just limited to the browser. Highly customizable.
View attachment 288025
Last updated 2023 but that does not bother me because its just a GUi for DNSproxy which can be updated manually. If anyone is interested in giving it a try.

GitHub - instantsc/SimpleDnsCrypt: A simple management tool for dnscrypt-proxy

A simple management tool for dnscrypt-proxy. Contribute to instantsc/SimpleDnsCrypt development by creating an account on GitHub.

github.com

Latest version of DNSproxy

GitHub - DNSCrypt/dnscrypt-proxy: dnscrypt-proxy 2 - A flexible DNS proxy, with support for encrypted DNS protocols.

dnscrypt-proxy 2 - A flexible DNS proxy, with support for encrypted DNS protocols. - DNSCrypt/dnscrypt-proxy

github.com

Consider switching to AdGuard Home. Easier to setup, automatic filter updating at regular intervals, plenty of options regarding cache and much more.
I used SimpleDNSCrypt in the past so I'm familiar with it but AdGuard Home is better and it's regularly updated. Use it locally on your PC similar to SimpleDNSCrypt.

GitHub - AdguardTeam/AdGuardHome: Network-wide ads & trackers blocking DNS server

Network-wide ads & trackers blocking DNS server. Contribute to AdguardTeam/AdGuardHome development by creating an account on GitHub.

github.com

 

[Zero Knowledge]

No NextDns in the test? Tempted to try ControlD, that's very impressive test results.

 

[Andy Ful]

Interesting capabilities of zero.dns0.eu:

https://www.dns0.eu/zero

DoH: https://zero.dns0.eu/
DoT: zero.dns0.eu

It is far more than blacklisting.
Did anyone use it? I am curious if the performance is as good as in the tests.

 

[SeriousHoax]

Interesting capabilities of zero.dns0.eu:

View attachment 288054
https://www.dns0.eu/zero

DoH: https://zero.dns0.eu/
DoT: zero.dns0.eu

It is far more than blacklisting.
Did anyone use it? I am curious if the performance is as good as in the tests.

Hi Andy! It's from the creator of NextDNS and NextDNS has most of these features.

 

[SHvFl]

Interesting capabilities of zero.dns0.eu:

View attachment 288054
https://www.dns0.eu/zero

DoH: https://zero.dns0.eu/
DoT: zero.dns0.eu

It is far more than blacklisting.
Did anyone use it? I am curious if the performance is as good as in the tests.

I use it. Is as fast as all major dns providers. Your location might affect speed as their network is based in Europe, but we are talking ms here.

Blocking capabilities should be similar to nextdns but I never tested is as it is not of my concern.