Comodo Cloud AV 1.1

[Deleted member 2913]

CCAV, CIS, etc..., etc... AutoSandbox is the strength of Comodo security software. And AS is not easy to use so Comodo Security Software yet is not an average or majority users security software.

Few are using VirusTotal in their products. I wonder why Comodo cancelled the idea of DACS...DACS was Distributive & Collaborative Scanning in their words...It was multiple engines like VT.

DACS would have been very helpful for Comodo Security Software. On alerts DACS results would have been very helpful for average users in taking action on the alerts & thus making Comodo Security Software easy to use.

And I wonder why was DACS cancelled coz if I remember correctly Melih was ready to share it free with the vendor of the selected engines in DACS.

Valkyrie is not realtime in CCAV. If they can make Valkyrie realtime in Comodo Security Software & show Valkyrie verdict on alerts then Comodo Security Software will be easy for average users.

 

[Deleted member 178]

CCAV, CIS, etc..., etc... AutoSandbox is the strength of Comodo security software. And AS is not easy to use so Comodo Security Software yet is not an average or majority users security software.

It was always the case, there is no such thing as a "friendly user" HIPS.

Few are using VirusTotal in their products. I wonder why Comodo cancelled the idea of DACS...DACS was Distributive & Collaborative Scanning in their words...It was multiple engines like VT.

DACS is an utopia, i never believed in it. It is a "fanboy wake up " statement; so fanboys could say in unison : "Melhi you are the best , comodo is the best..."

And I wonder why was DACS cancelled coz if I remember correctly Melih was ready to share it free with the vendor of the selected engines in DACS.

Do you really think that major vendors will share freely their database with another vendor...especially comodo...especially when CIS is free ! then why users would buy products from those vendors anymore.

 

[Deleted member 2913]

Couple products have VT scanning. Is it free to use?

 

[Deleted member 178]

Couple products have VT scanning. Is it free to use?

They must pay VT, who surely gives a percentage to the vendors.

 

[Deleted member 2913]

They must pay VT, who surely gives a percentage to the vendors.

So you mean Crystal Security Dev is paying to VT?

 

[Deleted member 178]

Of course, VT isn't free for commercial usage.

 

[Deleted member 2913]

He is the single Dev of Crystal, right?

Great...Commendable...Paying developing the product & providing free.

Hope Crystal turns out solid product & he deserves & gets the best out of it.

 

[Deleted member 178]

i don't know much of Crystal , never used it, if they do free products, maybe they don't have to pay VT. Maybe you should ask him.

 

[Deleted member 2913]

i don't know much of Crystal , never used it, if they do free products, maybe they don't have to pay VT. Maybe you should ask him.

Ohk, right. You mentioned commercial usage & Crystal is free.

 

[motox781]

CCAV, CIS, etc..., etc... AutoSandbox is the strength of Comodo security software. And AS is not easy to use so Comodo Security Software yet is not an average or majority users security software.

Isn't AS just like Default Deny (full block), but the program 'kinda' works?

I just wish Comodo's list of good apps was better. Auto Sandbox seems kinda aggressive for my liking.

Another thing that bothers me is the Windows flag for no spyware protection. I have the same problem and I question why a company would release a product not finished, when many users during beta complained about this issue.

Thanks.

 

[hjlbx]

So you mean Crystal Security Dev is paying to VT?

Crystal Security, HitmanPro, VooDooShield, SpyShelter, Process Explorer, Process Hacker, NVT ERP, etc, etc - they all use free public key. In fact, in HitmanPro a user can obtain their own VT public key and enter it on the Advanced tab.

Some might use modified public key that allows additional VT access - with some type of arrangement with VT, but I don't know of any such case.

 

[Deleted member 2913]

Crystal Security, HitmanPro, VooDooShield, SpyShelter, Process Explorer, Process Hacker, NVT ERP, etc, etc - they all use free public key. In fact, in HitmanPro a user can obtain their own VT public key and enter it on the Advanced tab.

Some might use modified public key that allows additional VT access - with some type of arrangement with VT, but I don't know of any such case.

Why Comodo dont try adding VT scan?

 

[hjlbx]

Why Comodo dont try adding VT scan?

I suspect Melih don't want to integrate VT into CIS; he'd rather use the databases that his company has built-up over the years. Integrate VT into CIS would be like admitting COMODO databases are insufficient. Kind of a real touchy thing - I would think - from COMODO's perspective, but this in only a guess.

You know, I never checked, but does KillSwitch have VT lookup ? I can't recall, but I do not think so.

 

[Deleted member 2913]

No KillSwitch doesn't have VT lookup.

 

[blueblackwow65]

Anyone know if the connection error is fixed yet? Thks

 

[Deleted member 2913]

Anyone know if the connection error is fixed yet? Thks

When I tried again it was working fine i.e connected fine.

So dont know if its a prob or was a temporary server prob.

You can give a try & see.

 

[blueblackwow65]

Thks I was reading that it is a driver problem with wireless connections.

 

[Kardo Kristal]

Crystal Security, HitmanPro, VooDooShield, SpyShelter, Process Explorer, Process Hacker, NVT ERP, etc, etc - they all use free public key. In fact, in HitmanPro a user can obtain their own VT public key and enter it on the Advanced tab.

Some might use modified public key that allows additional VT access - with some type of arrangement with VT, but I don't know of any such case.

@hjlbx Correct.

@yesnoo @Umbra I am using Public VT key in Crystal Security. By default when you request API key there is a 4 requests per minute/per IP limit but they raised my API key limit from 4 to 10 requests per minute/per IP.

Regards,
Kardo

 

[Deleted member 2913]

And what about the bandwidht thing? Is CCAV eating every bytes yet? And talk a little more about ram/cpu usage and ccav gui responsiveness? Is it worth to be used as only security layer on notebooks with win10?

I tried latest CCAV on Win 10 64.

My experience on my system...I find it good enough to use & good as only security layer. On my system it was light & GUI response was good too.

For bandwidth thing...there is an option now to auto upload the programs or not. During my test usage I kept auto-upload disabled & no bandwidth prob. Guess on auto-upload...25mb is the file size limit but not sure.

Give a try & see how it works on your system & if you find it overall good enough to use.

 

[blueblackwow65]

It may still have that not connected error