Advice Request Concern or discovery - what is the reason for changing the security setup?

Share practical recommendations that address the author's needs.
Andy Ful said:
Is there any advantage of using Malwarebytes Browser Guard on Edge (SmartScreen + PUA + Tracking prevention set to ON) with Ad-blocker?
Click to expand...
When using Microsoft Edge, a file is always partly downloaded (Bitdefender TrafficLight and/or Malwarebytes Browser Guard block downloads completely.
So, the system is cleaner when using a dedicated extension.
 
Gandalf_The_Grey said:
When using Microsoft Edge, a file is always partly downloaded (Bitdefender TrafficLight and/or Malwarebytes Browser Guard block downloads completely.
So, the system is cleaner when using a dedicated extension.
Click to expand...
But Defender scan it because of MOTW, then SRP / SmartScreen block it anyway.
So what's the advantage? A downloaded file can't run automatically by itself
 
Gandalf_The_Grey said:
Great setup (y)
I'm going for a similar but slightly more aggressive setup:
  • Windows 10 Home/Pro (depending on what came with the system)
  • Windows Defender Antivirus (UAC to always notify, ConfigureDefender High settings)
  • Microsoft Edge/Google chrome (user preference, I prefer Edge)
  • Simple Windows Hardening (great support here)
  • uBlock Origin (finding it lighter than AdGuard)
  • Bitdefender TrafficLight (finding it lighter than Malwarebytes)
Click to expand...
Exactly what I am using GTG, except I have UAC turned off. This set up works extremely well on my 7 year old desktop.
 
Andy Ful said:
Is there any advantage of using Malwarebytes Browser Guard on Edge (SmartScreen + PUA + Tracking prevention set to ON) with Ad-blocker?
Click to expand...
The computer I checked had Chrome as their default.

I threw Edge into the mix, as it's heavily promoted by Microsoft and pushed via the OS and Updates.



On their previous computer running Windows 7, Avast AV was the main protection software.

Switching to Windows 10 simplified everything.
 
security123 said:
But Defender scan it because of MOTW, then SRP / SmartScreen block it anyway.
So what's the advantage? A downloaded file can't run automatically by itself
Click to expand...
That file is in Edge cache and will be backupped by file history.
A second opinion scanner will warn you and you can remove it.
By using one of the mentioned extensions this is avoided.
The extensions of Microsoft (usable for Chrome) and Emsisoft have both the same "problem".
Using another AV with Microsoft Edge also demonstrates this problem when downloading malware.
 
Andy Ful said:
Understand. But, the chances for that are so minimal. I am not sure if it is worth the effort. :unsure:
Furthermore, the Edge browser has an option to clear the cache on exit.
Click to expand...
But if you use file history for backup and you wait too long before clearing cache the file is ending in your backup.
For me countering that with one extension is well worth it.
It's not a problem if you don't use file history.
 
Andy Ful said:
All those are nice setups.:)(y)
But, if we want to be on-topic, then it would be also interesting why we changed the previous one.:unsure:
Click to expand...
Heh, heh, I'll play. In the last 10 years or so I've mostly used Avast, Emsisoft, WD, Online Armour, Winpatrol, Malwarebytes, OSArmour, Appguard, Shadow Defender, MBAE and Voodoo Shield, in addition to another 20 or 30 products I've just tried briefly. Mostly did this out of curiosity and/or boredom or just wanted to check how a particular software would work on my computer. Now I'm over it, do not want to use 3rd party software or anything with a lot of popups, just something simple that provides an above average level of protection, Andy's tools fit the bill.
 
Gandalf_The_Grey said:
But if you use file history for backup and you wait too long before clearing cache the file is ending in your backup.
For me countering that with one extension is well worth it.
It's not a problem if you don't use file history.
Click to expand...
The only thing I doesn't understand is how even a backup of malicious downloaded file is a problem.

Defender does scan it right? Same for backup.
And it can't be executed on hardened system.

What I'm missing?
 
Gandalf_The_Grey said:
But if you use file history for backup and you wait too long before clearing cache the file is ending in your backup.
...
Click to expand...

Using TrafficLight probably does not hurt (I am not sure about performance impact).
Did you consider to exclude the Edge cache in file history? It would save some space independently of using (or not) the TrafficLight.:unsure:
 
security123 said:
The only thing I doesn't understand is how even a backup of malicious downloaded file is a problem.

Defender does scan it right? Same for backup.
And it can't be executed on hardened system.

What I'm missing?
Click to expand...
It can't be executed, but Windows Defender doesn't scan or remove it when it's on your backup drive.
Maybe after a full scan of your backup, which I never perform.
So, you are right that it is not a real problem, but I just don't want it on my system.
 
Andy Ful said:
Using TrafficLight probably does not hurt (I am not sure about performance impact).
Did you consider to exclude the Edge cache in file history? It would save some space independently of using (or not) the TrafficLight.:unsure:
Click to expand...
It doesn't hurt performance, but I never thought about excluding Edge's cache from file history (y)
The cache is in the backup by default.
I have to see where it is and how to exclude it. 🤔
Thanks again for an interesting suggestion.
 
Gandalf_The_Grey said:
It doesn't hurt performance, but I never thought about excluding Edge's cache from file history (y)
The cache is in the backup by default.
I have to see where it is and how to exclude it. 🤔
Thanks again for an interesting suggestion.
Click to expand...
I think that it is here:
c:\Users\--------\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Edge\User Data\Default\Cache\
 
Jan Willy said:
Perhaps a silly question, but could the extension Cache Killer be a simple set and forget solution? Also for the purpose of etag tracking.
Click to expand...
Can you provide a link to that extension?
I found some troubling information when googling for it:
Comment on this page states that it was mal-ware: I have not verified it however. *Edit - this was about the time it was removed from Chrome, so I'm going to guess it was reported, verified and removed.
Click to expand...
 
I want protection & the best privacy I can without imposing a high load & I don't want the PC unusable by others - I did this PC as a new build back in May the last thing I want is good money spent on hardware drained away by AV software that that feels it's OK to use ridiculous amounts of resources & the last thing on their mind is lightness - For me I don't want to spend more time configuring a PC than using it either so I tend to use established programs rather than extreme hardening - I'm not a fan of lots of extensions
 
Jan Willy said:
Perhaps a silly question, but could the extension Cache Killer be a simple set and forget solution? Also for the purpose of etag tracking.
Click to expand...
It could. But, there are many things that can be improved by adding extensions so one can easily end with too many extensions. It is always better to use (reasonably) the Edge/Windows capabilities to reduce the number of extensions. Another problem is that extensions may work not exactly as they should due to frequent improvements in web browsers.
 
Last edited:
Cortex said:
I want protection & the best privacy I can without imposing a high load & I don't want the PC unusable by others - I did this PC as a new build back in May the last thing I want is good money spent on hardware drained away by AV software that that feels it's OK to use ridiculous amounts of resources & the last thing on their mind is lightness - For me I don't want to spend more time configuring a PC than using it either so I tend to use established programs rather than extreme hardening - I'm not a fan of lots of extensions
Click to expand...
Buy a Mac and use defaults in default Browser
Best security and privacy by default and you're not unique in fingerprinting
 

Recently browsing

Members who viewed this thread in the last 5 minutes

You may also like...

Back
Top