Assigned Does ZAL use > 100 MB RAM?

[Andrew999]

Hi,

I wish that ZAM 3.0 would have an Anti keylogger feature so I could remove ZAL 2.0 so I could save over 100 MB of ram having to run the program just for an anti-keylogger. I turn off Real-time protection because I am using ZAM 3.0. I guess when you turn off ZAL real-time protection it doesn't unload the signatures from memory I guess.

This screenshot may look like Zemana Anti Malware but it is Zemana Anti Malware's real-time protection module I believe, also it has the ZAL program icon for the proccess.

I think this may the only process for ZAM 3.0 possibly.

 

[gery79]

zemana is resource hungry in general

 

[JM Safe]

Hello Andrew,

You can find my answer about antikeylogger feature in Zemana AntiMalware 3.0 here: Update - Zemana AntiMalware 3.0 Premium Beta is here!

@gery79 ZAM 3.0 has a very low memory usage, so really light.

Thanks for your feedback guys.

 

[Aleeyen]

For me its in the 90s and for KIS its around 150.

 

[AriDfoix]

I can speak only for the ZAM beta actually, the Idle usage is really low; it has a jumping during scan to near 100% CPU usage, but many scanners do that, to end first the scan, I don't like that much, but not my choice. Sometime is better wait a minute more, but going slower. Someone else will say better faster, so is hard to say.

Idle Usage.

During Scan, but the CPU go even up more.

Not sure about ZAL, from what I see is not using newer engine.

Regards

Actually all the third party antimalware that I use, except one do the booster during the scan, sometime the fan of the laptop is so loud hehe...