I will like to know what is other users take on this and if it is safe,seems outdated.
Terry Ganzi Level 26 Thread author Verified Top Poster Well-known Feb 7, 2014 1,540 Jul 24, 2016 #1 I will like to know what is other users take on this and if it is safe,seems outdated. Last edited by a moderator: Jul 24, 2016 Reactions: Logethica and Huchim
Terry Ganzi Level 26 Thread author Verified Top Poster Well-known Feb 7, 2014 1,540 Jul 24, 2016 #2 OpenSLL file date to 2005 and unsigned may i add this is 2016 so i'm bothered. Reactions: Logethica
H hjlbx Jul 24, 2016 #3 It's a copy right date - and not a digital certificate time stamp... If you notice the *.dll is not digitally signed and there is no requirement to do so; kernel mode drivers must be digitally signed with new rules forthcoming on Feb 14, 2017. Last edited by a moderator: Jul 25, 2016 Reactions: Logethica, jamescv7, Deleted Member 3a5v73x and 5 others
It's a copy right date - and not a digital certificate time stamp... If you notice the *.dll is not digitally signed and there is no requirement to do so; kernel mode drivers must be digitally signed with new rules forthcoming on Feb 14, 2017.
NekoHr Level 3 Verified Well-known Feb 5, 2016 139 Jul 25, 2016 #4 hjlbx said: It's a copy right date - and not a digital certificate time stamp... Click to expand... But if you look product version you will see it is 1.0.2d, that one was released 09.07.2015., there are newer versions. Reactions: Logethica and Andytay70
hjlbx said: It's a copy right date - and not a digital certificate time stamp... Click to expand... But if you look product version you will see it is 1.0.2d, that one was released 09.07.2015., there are newer versions.
Xtwillight Level 6 Verified Well-known Jul 1, 2014 297 Jul 25, 2016 #5 i have this question, at Fabian Wosar from Emsi redirected Reactions: frogboy and Logethica
jamescv7 Level 85 Verified Honorary Member Mar 15, 2011 13,070 Jul 25, 2016 #6 Although the Copyright is more just a title description still a good way to create a feedback. Many AV's expose some vulnerabilities because of their files are not been update and remain to be danger. Reactions: Logethica, Xtwillight and Terry Ganzi
Although the Copyright is more just a title description still a good way to create a feedback. Many AV's expose some vulnerabilities because of their files are not been update and remain to be danger.
H hjlbx Jul 25, 2016 #7 NekoHr said: But if you look product version you will see it is 1.0.2d, that one was released 09.07.2015., there are newer versions. Click to expand... There could be a technical or another reason why Emsisoft continues to use that version. Someone should ask why it is still be used at the Emsisoft support forum. Reactions: Logethica and Xtwillight
NekoHr said: But if you look product version you will see it is 1.0.2d, that one was released 09.07.2015., there are newer versions. Click to expand... There could be a technical or another reason why Emsisoft continues to use that version. Someone should ask why it is still be used at the Emsisoft support forum.
NekoHr Level 3 Verified Well-known Feb 5, 2016 139 Jul 27, 2016 #8 Of course there could be reason, nobody said they should just use it because it is new. Reactions: Logethica