In my case, it wasn't a problem with the free download, but with @Divine_Barakah it was for the pro version, so there wasn't a thought to submit it from my end.Why not ask for VT help?
In my case, it wasn't a problem with the free download, but with @Divine_Barakah it was for the pro version, so there wasn't a thought to submit it from my end.Why not ask for VT help?
That's a good point, and that Eset was possibly doing a good job in detecting it?Backupper Pro and Partition assitsant are by the same company. BP is not blocked but PA is. Maybe PA has a system optimiser incorporated that made it flagged as PUP. I will send an email to AOMEI and see about it.
Most probably, but as I said it would have been nice if Eset provided more info.That's a good point, and that Eset was possibly doing a good job in detecting it?
I just checked it out on my end, with Proton VPN enabled and for the tests I did run, Eset did wonderfully.Most probably, but as I said it would have been nice if Eset provided more info.
I am having a bad day as Eset does not seem to play well with Adguard VPN. When VPN is activated, Eset does not detect any of AMTSO tests.

Just check it out on my end, with Proton VPN enabled, Eset did wonderfully.
Wow, well at least we know Proton works with Eset. That's two issues you've had links from their forum for, yikes. Is Eset a little finicky in general?
It seems tye problem is related to Adguard VPN protocol.Wow, well at least we know Proton works with Eset. That's two issues you've had links from their forum for, yikes.
I think Eset provides more protection than a vpn. It's not about the price you paid for them.If i dont manage to get this sorted out, unfortunately i will ditch Eset.
I dont have many choices. Almost every VPN provider is blocked in Egypt. I can replace the security product but not the vpn in my case.I think Eset provides more protection than a vpn. It's not about the price you paid for them.
you lost me -- are you running Eset AV and F-secure AV on same computer (or browser ext?)... on different pc & you sometimes check the results against each other...It's not where I dump Eset for it's occasional FP's and this, but, I will still use F-Secure and Avast free as well, to help compare and keep each other honest![]()
Found this, but still it does not give enough info about what it actually doesNow it's become more intriguing. I really want to know why it is being detected.
Did Eset block the phishing test?I just checked it out on my end, with Proton VPN enabled and for the tests I did run, Eset did wonderfully.
View attachment 294060
Not surprised ESET flags it as PUP when it can flag malware like valleyrat as PUPI was downloading AOMEI Partition Master Pro and Eset did detect it as PUP and aborted the download.
I've been using PM for years and I don't remember the installer was bundled with any other apps.
Can you check the partition master installer itself against VT database?Not surprised ESET flags it as PUP when it can flag malware like valleyrat as PUP
View attachment 294064
Two different laptopsyou lost me -- are you running Eset AV and F-secure AV on same computer (or browser ext?)... on different pc & you sometimes check the results against each other...![]()
One of the reasons I set everything to Aggressive in ESET, including PUP and PUA.Not surprised ESET flags it as PUP when it can flag malware like valleyrat as PUP
View attachment 294064
backdoor drops so assumed pup as decoyIt's normal to have this type of PUP detection in ESET. They rely on AppSteem's info to detect such programs. But ESET, along with Kaspersky, are two of the rare AVs that let you whitelist by detection name as well as file hash. So just create detection exclusions for such programs.
One of the reasons I set everything to Aggressive in ESET, including PUP and PUA.
But to be fair, from the screenshot, here Bitdefender, G-Data (own engine), K7 and Microsoft are also detecting it as a PUP so there must be a valid reason for that.
it happens all the time vendors think it is a pup. turns out to be a rootkitIt's normal to have this type of PUP detection in ESET. They rely on AppSteem's info to detect such programs. But ESET, along with Kaspersky, are two of the rare AVs that let you whitelist by detection name as well as file hash. So just create detection exclusions for such programs.
One of the reasons I set everything to Aggressive in ESET, including PUP and PUA.
But to be fair, from the screenshot, here Bitdefender, G-Data (own engine), K7 and Microsoft are also detecting it as a PUP so there must be a valid reason for that.