Hot Take Eset detects AOMEI PM as PUP

ESET
41 Replies 6,994 Views
That's a good point, and that Eset was possibly doing a good job in detecting it?
Most probably, but as I said it would have been nice if Eset provided more info.

I am having a bad day as Eset does not seem to play well with Adguard VPN. When VPN is activated, Eset does not detect any of AMTSO tests.
 
Most probably, but as I said it would have been nice if Eset provided more info.

I am having a bad day as Eset does not seem to play well with Adguard VPN. When VPN is activated, Eset does not detect any of AMTSO tests.
I just checked it out on my end, with Proton VPN enabled and for the tests I did run, Eset did wonderfully.

Screenshot 2025-12-28 184146.png
 
It's not where I dump Eset for it's occasional FP's and this, but, I will still use F-Secure and Avast free as well, to help compare and keep each other honest ;)
you lost me -- are you running Eset AV and F-secure AV on same computer (or browser ext?)... on different pc & you sometimes check the results against each other... :unsure:
 
you lost me -- are you running Eset AV and F-secure AV on same computer (or browser ext?)... on different pc & you sometimes check the results against each other... :unsure:
Two different laptops ;) I also have a Windows 10 desktop that I fire up once in a while. At times, I use one laptop for the better keyboard, and the other for the better screen. I do like comparing them against each other, checking the results against each other :)
 
It's normal to have this type of PUP detection in ESET. They rely on AppSteem's info to detect such programs. But ESET, along with Kaspersky, are two of the rare AVs that let you whitelist by detection name as well as file hash. So just create detection exclusions for such programs.
Not surprised ESET flags it as PUP when it can flag malware like valleyrat as PUP
View attachment 294064
One of the reasons I set everything to Aggressive in ESET, including PUP and PUA.
But to be fair, from the screenshot, here Bitdefender, G-Data (own engine), K7 and Microsoft are also detecting it as a PUP so there must be a valid reason for that.
 
It's normal to have this type of PUP detection in ESET. They rely on AppSteem's info to detect such programs. But ESET, along with Kaspersky, are two of the rare AVs that let you whitelist by detection name as well as file hash. So just create detection exclusions for such programs.

One of the reasons I set everything to Aggressive in ESET, including PUP and PUA.
But to be fair, from the screenshot, here Bitdefender, G-Data (own engine), K7 and Microsoft are also detecting it as a PUP so there must be a valid reason for that.
backdoor drops so assumed pup as decoy
 
It's normal to have this type of PUP detection in ESET. They rely on AppSteem's info to detect such programs. But ESET, along with Kaspersky, are two of the rare AVs that let you whitelist by detection name as well as file hash. So just create detection exclusions for such programs.

One of the reasons I set everything to Aggressive in ESET, including PUP and PUA.
But to be fair, from the screenshot, here Bitdefender, G-Data (own engine), K7 and Microsoft are also detecting it as a PUP so there must be a valid reason for that.
it happens all the time vendors think it is a pup. turns out to be a rootkit
1767022630963.png
 

Recently browsing

Members who viewed this thread in the last 5 minutes

Back
Top