Deleted member 178
Ok i see , so it was more the "lack" of them rather than the efficiency of EAM.Hi
in comparison between Emsisoft and Kaspersky , Kaspersky has more feautre that Emsisoft do't has, same as Secure Conection,Trusted application control ....
i will say we implement what we do best and consider what is really useful for the "classic users", we want to be the best in our domain rather than average in everywhere."it is a choice we made, we don't sell bloat" nice one , I hope that Emsisoft (same as another famous company) add VPN technology
Maybe you can try the latest version, we fixed several minor bugs.for buggy , I directly say (for me) the GUI is a little buggy, some time "the close button" not work well...
Using BD is better than the one we used before (Ikarus), extremely potent detection but huge on FPs...BD engine proved to improve on FPs, in the latest AV-Comparative tests, we had zero FPs.I have a suggestion, why Emsisoft not to try to remove BD Engine and work in it own engine?(BD engine is heavy and also have many FPs...)
Note that at the moment using BD engine is what works best for us.
I will take your suggestion into account and transmit it