- Apr 5, 2017
- 836
That was a good read @BryanB (it was in plain English which for once i could understand) thanks.
European Lawmakers Vote to Ban Kaspersky Lab Products
- Thread starter LASER_oneXM
- Start date
- Aug 18, 2016
- 561
Why wouldn't government's make their "own" custom build security software?
They Spend billions and billions on making fighter jet's... their cash stack is almost infinite so why not?
They Spend billions and billions on making fighter jet's... their cash stack is almost infinite so why not?
- Apr 16, 2017
- 1,883
Govt's tend to have their own OS Forks. Usually Linux for higher security. The Italian Govt. years ago were forking Linux for their governmental systems ensuring high security. Eventually that filtered down to Maegia Linux, which is a nice security, self-security auditing distro. But the reality is, when you are partnered at the hip with Trend Micro and McAfee, why make your own when you are largely funding those already? Trend fused CIA Analysts and Booz Threat Labs into their own, essentially making what largely is a govt. run AV firm.
Side Note: They had special interest in Webroot early on as well. But when the CEO turned them down he started telling people the govt. was working with aliens and were harassing/following him around for some reason and that they had all kinds of super advanced technology. Eventually he was found at the bottom of a cliff.
- Aug 17, 2017
- 1,508
@ForgottenSeer 58943 said: Trend fused CIA Analysts and Booz Threat Labs into their own, essentially making what largely is a govt. run AV firm.
Ok but why have partners involved in something so secretive, just more threat surface, isn't that how you would see it.
@ForgottenSeer 58943 said: Side Note: They had special interest in Webroot early on as well. But when the CEO turned them down he started telling people the govt. was working with aliens and were harassing/following him around for some reason and had all kinds of super advanced technology. Eventually he was found at the bottom of a cliff.
What is your opinion on this, gut feeling.
Ok but why have partners involved in something so secretive, just more threat surface, isn't that how you would see it.
@ForgottenSeer 58943 said: Side Note: They had special interest in Webroot early on as well. But when the CEO turned them down he started telling people the govt. was working with aliens and were harassing/following him around for some reason and had all kinds of super advanced technology. Eventually he was found at the bottom of a cliff.
What is your opinion on this, gut feeling.
Last edited:
I would guess there are two primary considerations;
1) He went crazy.
2) He was very smart and wealthy, was on to something and viewed as a risk to their agenda.
Option 1 would ignore the hundreds of thousands of people across the world that report similar things. Targeted individuals, gang stalked people, blah blah blah. Some people thought Michael Hasting's was going nuts when he said his electronics weren't working right and he was convinced they had some advanced technology to take over his Mercedes from remote. (look up how he died and what he was researching at time of death)
Option 2 is no less comforting. They have technology that can pretty well screw up your reality. To the untrained observer, it can appear like paranormal activity. When you go tampering with frequencies, brainwaves/microwaves, and other things you can pretty well mess someone up pretty good. Alien technology or advanced govt, or hybrid govt+alien technology is just another in a long list of questions for those investigating such matters. (up to and including psychotronic, radionic, scalar, etc)
Sounding the alarm on ‘directed energy’ attacks - Policy Forum
- Aug 17, 2017
- 1,508
Similar threads
