What made you sort them in this way? Eset HIPS and IDS can be very powerful if set it correctly. About KIS, I have some experience, it's very good. About F-secure?Akash209 said:1.Fsecure is2013
2..Kis2013
3.Ess 6
Nikos751 said:What made you sort them in this way? Eset HIPS and IDS can be very powerful if set it correctly. About KIS, I have some experience, it's very good. About F-secure?Akash209 said:1.Fsecure is2013
2..Kis2013
3.Ess 6
jamescv7 said:I couldn't get my suggestion there as, both products have better protection especially web based threats from zero day + implemented HIPS or BB for represented name components.
For F-secure their Deepguard feature isn't an ignore component since it made really well for protection status.
For F-secure their Deepguard feature isn't an ignore component since it made really well for protection status.
Gnosis said:For F-secure their Deepguard feature isn't an ignore component since it made really well for protection status.
I have heard of their "DeepGuard". I don't know if it is HIPS, auto sandbox for malware analysis, or a BB. If it is any one of those three, there is no doubt in my mind that F-Secure can kick some arse.
Wikipedia refers to it as a "HIPS or advanced system monitoring technology"jamescv7 said:Nikos751: What I meant to say is that I've couldn't picked which is best for the 3 security products since both of them differ in protection status and almost have the features which are standard to use.
Gnosis: From what I've understand in DeepGuard feature is that acts as malware/viruses behavior blocker.
nastavnikhe said:I used F-Secure IS and I am very pleased. Protection was flawless. Maybe it's just a bit heavy on resources.
I do not understand why F-Secure does not have a firewall,F-Secure uses windows firewall!?
Earth said:Do you plan to use any of these software you mentioned?