AVs with HTTPS scanning don't need browser extensions unless they want to know more about the user. Also more extensions = higher RAM usage.Have you installed their browser extension? If yes then Kaspersky won't inject script anyway.
AVs with HTTPS scanning don't need browser extensions unless they want to know more about the user. Also more extensions = higher RAM usage.Have you installed their browser extension? If yes then Kaspersky won't inject script anyway.
Hahaha lolSame config from the last year, the only major difference is that I dropped Chrome completely in favor of Firefox.
BTW some day Chrome's Software Reporter Tool was eating 50% of my CPU without even having it open, I hated that so much I ended importing everything to my FF account and removing it completely. I kept Edge Chromium as a backup if I ever found a bad-designed website that deliberately block non-chromium users.
Maybe they have xss and other scripts based detection in the extension ?AVs with HTTPS scanning don't need browser extensions unless they want to know more about the user. Also more extensions = higher RAM usage.
That's not the point. I'm saying Kaspersky don't inject scripts if the extension is installed. Even many regular Kaspersky users don't know this info.AVs with HTTPS scanning don't need browser extensions unless they want to know more about the user. Also more extensions = higher RAM usage.
It's good for keeping my programs up to dateHow's Chocolatey holding up?
Lol consumer grade patch management products are a joke18/05/2020
Clean 2004 install
- No 3rd party AV for now
- Added Emsisoft extension
- FF as default browser
- Went back with PatchMyPC, Chocolatey is good but sometimes is a mess and stores lots of files in its folder.
Clean 2004 install
Genuinely I don't like W10 but we have to live with it, 2004 feels less buggy than previous releases.How do you like it so far?
You can make it look like your grandma XP if you like XD.Genuinely I don't like W10 but we have to live with it, 2004 feels less buggy than previous releases.
I like the UI but I don't like their "everyone is an unpaid beta tester" approachYou can make it look like your grandma XP if you like XD.
that's why I run LTSC with many programs replacedI like the UI but I don't like their "everyone is an unpaid beta tester" approach
Usability is very important so nice change.20/05/2020
Added CD with High Preset
- Cloud level set to HIGH (HIGHEST triggers BAFS when I code)
- No Network Protection
I tried enterprise McAfee but it made my fans ramp up, on demand scans use 100% CPU and web protection currently is not compatible with latest FF.Usability is very important so nice change.
Users sometimes need to sacrifice protection level for convenience in their daily usage.Usability is very important so nice change.
Thats so sad. I hope you make the necessary amends asap and get it back. A warrior without a sword is not a good sight.Off topic (unfortunately got to trouble with my family so I don't own the computer anymore ) .
What would you do if you can't even use your device.Users sometimes need to sacrifice protection level for convenience in their daily usage.
It basically was one of the worst AVs to run on my old 8700p broken fan 4gb ddr2 ram PC.I tried enterprise McAfee but it made my fans ramp up, on demand scans use 100% CPU and web protection currently is not compatible with latest FF.
Can't imagine how people can live without a system backup software like Macrium.
Did it cause any issue?No Network Protection
With NP enabled, dslreports tests shows incredible high bufferbloat values in the upload side. According to dslreports FAQ, I guess NP buffers too much data when scanning traffic.Did it cause any issue?