Thanks to you and @Kongo I checked that thread, which I missed when traveling.Exactly this post that came out the discussion, I was trying to remember @Kongo if you judged me, let me tell you, you are not a friend lol, I should have posted when @cruelsister commented, I would have already liquidated in the first move. I think she got tired of waiting. BTW, thank you very much!
@SeriousHoax I like seeing consumer-grade AVs in action.
You missed my thread? And you are clearly mentioning that
I don't think so, a little tired and relatively exhausted. Maybe that's it.Why so spiteful today?
If that's an apology then I forgive youI don't think so, a little tired and relatively exhausted. Maybe that's it.
That's great.
Thanks. @cruelsister 's setup is simple yet super effective. I's all good, CF/CIS works great when tweaked.
I won't be using it otherwise. I am deploying it on business machines as well.
It uses Kaspersky or Sophos, whatever you choose.
So it uses Kaspersky's engine, while also being a EDR. Thats cool
How good is their threat emulation? Does it use Kaspersky's Sandbox aswell, or is it their own?And finally, here's Harmony detecting malware with an emulation(it contained a JS script trap that installed WSHRAT)
View attachment 276572
How good is it compared to Kaspersky Opentip (imma kaspersky user and curious lol)Their emulation system is impressive and has detected some clearly unknown malware.
They have their own systems
Yes, Threat Emulation in the cloud uses Bitdefender engine as well, together with all their engines. It also uses the Kaspersky reputation feeds.
Is the demo/trial available to everyone?
BTW Good Morning, Good Afternoon or Good Evening! Is everything ok with you? Now answering your question, because I was a dry ear lol, I literally parachuted into @Kongo's post, despite mentioning and leaving Kongo credits in another post, when I tested it, I should have at least asked his permission if I could share it in another post, but by referencing his post and leaving his credits in the post, @Kongo would have been aware if there were later any discussions on which I had posted, and he would have remedied it when the discussion about the stealer malware started, at least it would have avoided some unnecessary discussions on my part. Regarding the bad configuration I said, was that I enabled HIPS and everything maybe that there was no need in CF, firewall was in custom settings, when I ran the malware then several pop-pus appeared in HIPS and firewall when the malware started its execution, I had to make the decisions alone what I allowed or what I blocked, I must have allowed something that I shouldn't have, that ended up infecting the machine, too many settings that I adjusted, unnecessary rules created that culminated in a CF failure, who was to blame? Mine. Did you understand? I hope I understood. I apologize for the misunderstanding, I have a great admiration, respect and affection for you, since the first day I started talking to you here at MalwareTips.
