- Feb 24, 2017
- 1,661
both Kaspersky's and Emsisoft's firewall failed that botnet test, so it's clearly not that. i'm sure what @Umbra is saying is true, it's just checking for open ports.
I guess MR.Frog using Emsisoft.oth Kaspersky's and Emsisoft's firewall
Thinking it's a load of crap in some areas - one of the tests was where it downloads an exe file from a 'reputable site' - I have VS and VS did absolutely nothing!
Yes the frog is using EIS.I guess MR.Frog using Emsisoft.
It could be something like that. I am just not sure why I did so well in the test.@frogboy being in AUS I wonder if they are practicing strict dns ip filtering and maybe a little packet filtering on the side too... I guess at least part of the answer could be in here somewhere:
Internet censorship in Australia - Wikipedia
Seems clear they are doing something in AUS more than at least here in the US.
You're a frog that's why!! There's something in the water in that pond of yours and it ain't bourbon...It could be something like that. I am just not sure why I did so well in the test.
There is absolutely no water in my Bourbon glasses and bottle in the freezer no water no ice.You're a frog that's why!! There's something in the water in that pond of yours and it ain't bourbon...
I wouldn't worry about the F. We're in good company here. F is clearly the new AI got an F rating but of course with different justification.
.
Yes the frog is using EIS.
omfg, what are those ports?can you tell me? or find? Wanna close them maunully.
Now who's paranoid
F stands for Fantastic I might add.I wouldn't worry about the F. We're in good company here. F is clearly the new A
Fail. You can access websites in countries that are embargoed by the United States and the European Union, such as North Korea. This test usually fails because your security infrastructure cannot block Internet connections by geography.
Fail. Your current system allows the outbound transmission of sensitive data such as credit card numbers. It should both detect and block this type of data loss. Many security and compliance systems are deployed in Tap mode and detect, but do not block, the leakage of sensitive information outside of your organization.
Fail. Your current system allows the outbound transmission of sensitive data such as US Social Security numbers. It should both detect and block this type of data loss. Many security and compliance systems are deployed in Tap mode and detect, but do not block, the leakage of sensitive information outside of your organization.
Fail. Your current system allows the outbound transmission of sensitive data such as software code. It should both detect and block this type of data loss. Many security and compliance systems are deployed in Tap mode and detect, but do not block, the leakage of sensitive information outside of your organization.
View attachment 158985
I got A. It seems ublock with some filters blocked everything, avira didn't even have to do the job
only these failed:
nope, the difference is from the filters we addeduBlock seems to have absolutely no influence here for me, got the same result with it enabled (defalut), enabled (tweaked) and disabled.
botnet test and others don't affect with adblocker.nope, the difference is from the filters we added
figure it out. because my uBO blocked this website, if you allow it, you will fail against botnet but if you block it, you will passbotnet test and others don't affect with adblocker.