- Nov 15, 2012
- 1,765
Which one you would you prefer out of them.
Last edited:
Polymath 1.0' pid='41520111' dateline='1406681755 said:Kaspersky arguably is the best :smile: It employs multiple scanning engines, has the best zero day implementation of new threats and detection rates, low false positive reporting, its' heuristics analysis is highly accurate at in the wild detection of suspect code before being identified as a threat by other less sophisticated scanners. It is also capable of opening and hence scanning within more packed file types than any other offering thereby preventing problems before the fact. When coupled with its' superior sandboxing firewall then it is a no brainer as to its' merits. The reason some short sighted folks pass on it is not due to other offerings being better, but rather Kaspersky because it employs multiple scanning engines and a process sandboxing firewall is a tad heavier on resource usage. Trading a few more processor cycles for an inferior solution is hardly a reason to use another a/v if one is contemplating a paid solution. Additionally Kaspersky is often less expensive than all the other paid crap.
I believe we are already of the same mind as to Kaspersky's merits, I just gave you ammunition :blackhat:
Take care
please tell me where I can buy KIS or ESS for those prices, thanks.
yes kaspersky is expensive than another.Eset is better because :
Performance ( system rensponse, start up etc...)
Detection of Potentially Unwanted Programs (the best you can get in the market today)
Easy of use.
Eset also is far cheaper (at least in my country)