Had this before, but thought spoofing it completely doesn't have any negative side effects. I personally didn't find any site that broke cause of that entry, but as it can be a security risk according to @qua3k opinion, I will disable it. AdGuard extension actually also has an option to spoof the referrer, so I just might set the about:config entry to default and use their option.
Or you could try this:AdGuard extension actually also has an option to spoof the referrer, so I just might set the about:config entry to default and use their option.
network.http.referer.trimmingPolicy=2
network.http.referer.XOriginPolicy=2
network.http.referer.XOriginTrimmingPolicy=2
avoidthehack.com
I think I stick with AdGuards referrer spoofing as it is enabled by default when enabling Stealth Mode as far as I know. So it would have a lower impact on my fingerprint than also playing in the about:config settings when I am using AdGuard already anyway.I also refer to these
The last one is quite conservative but shows various options.How to Set Up Firefox for Privacy | Avoid the Hack (avoidthehack!)
These are the tweaks you should make, settings to you should set, and extensions you should download to make Firefox more privacy friendly.
Stop spoofing the referrer. There are sites that check referrer as part of CSRF protection and you will break sites by doing so. You should avoid messing with referrer settings in the first place; browsers already default to a sufficiently strictHad this before, but thought spoofing it completely doesn't have any negative side effects. I personally didn't find any site that broke cause of that entry, but as it can be a security risk according to @qua3k opinion, I will disable it. AdGuard extension actually also has an option to spoof the referrer, so I just might set the about:config entry to default and use their option.
View attachment 259875
strict-origin-when-cross-origin for requests without an explicit Referrer-Policy. What you’re setting will break sites.
Does it replace adguard for windows too
Actually it basically does combined with the free AdGuard extension. All the important features of AdGuard are included in the extension. And the extension doesn't break the HTTPS encryption. Won't use AdGuard Windows anymore in its current state.Does it replace adguard for windows too
I'm not using AdGuard Windows anymore so I don't really know, but they mention some fixes in their patchnotes. (v. 3.4.0)
It was a little buggy. The UI crashed from time to time and I constantly had a CPU usage between 2-4% and a RAM usage of 600mb which shouldn't be the case with my specs. After all the system didn't really feel slow or sluggish in any way. Protection-wise I can't really say much, as I didn't really test it. All I can say is that the signatures Clam+Cloud are acceptable and that Immunet detects malicious scripts (VBS,JS etc.) and other file extensions with static scan which many other AVs don't. If you use HiBit Uninstaller to uninstall Immunet then you should switch to another, as Immunets proactive protection component seems to block some actions performed by HiBit when you uninstall software.
Members who viewed this thread in the last 5 minutes
Continue exploring the conversation.
27
