Unverified Kongo's PC Security Config

[Kongo]

- removed SafeToOpen and added Port Authority to Firefox (If one uses uBlock Origin, you can simply enable the filter "Block Outsider Intrustion into LAN")

I however decided to keep using Ghostery and add that extra extension that also gives me a better overview of the blocks

​

 

[simmerskool]

- added Port Authority to Firefox (If one uses uBlock Origin, you can simply enable the filter "Block Outsider Intrustion into LAN")

trying Port Authority, thanks! -- this is the first that I've heard of it.

 

[Kongo]

- removed Firewall Hardening

- removed Osprey Browser Protection

+ added CyberLock

 

[simmerskool]

- removed Firewall Hardening

- removed Osprey Browser Protection

+ added CyberLock

and take a look at SiriusLLM (runs with Cyberlock) if you haven't tried it already...

 

[Kongo]

and take a look at SiriusLLM (runs with Cyberlock) if you haven't tried it already...

Oh trust me I did. I really love it but I don't want to add another tool to CyberLock + Deep Instinct. I purchased a lifetime license for CL and will just wait until SiriusGPT will be integrated. For now Deep Instinct + CyberLock is running smoothly.

Integrate it soon @danb . I dare you!

 

[Kongo]

+ added SafeToOpen to Firefox

Now my computer security is mainly based on different kinds of AI

Deep Instinct, CyberLock (SiriusGPT) and SafeToOpen

Ai is truly taking over the world - or at least my computer

 

[Zartarra]

How performs SafeToOpen lately in the detection of phishing sites?

 

[Kongo]

How performs SafeToOpen lately in the detection of phishing sites?

It performs well in my tests.

As an example:

phishing site that impersonates a microsoft login:

After a quick analysis of SafeToOpen:

It basically says that the website is trying to impersonate the site live.com and is therefor blocked.
So it really is working well for me here. There is no other extension of this kind that I know of.

 

[Parkinsond]

It performs well in my tests.

As an example:

Fresh phishing site that impersonates a microsoft login:
View attachment 291797

After a quick analysis of SafeToOpen:
View attachment 291798

It basically says that the website is trying to impersonate the site live.com and is therefor blocked.
So it really is working well for me here. There is no other extension of this kind that I know of.

It just does not load, without any extensions

 

[Kongo]

It just does not load, without any extensions

View attachment 291799

Send me a PM and I can share it with you.

 

[Parkinsond]

Send me a PM and I can share it with you.

Yes, the full address loaded this time; it is quite tricky.
However, it was flagged by K portal and NSW.

 

[Parkinsond]

Full details

Malicious URL Scanner | Scan URLs for Malware | URL Checker

Scan URLs for malware and phishing with our free malicious URL scanner. Check links in real-time to detect suspicious domains and prevent cyber threats.

www.ipqualityscore.com

 

[Zartarra]

It performs well in my tests.

As an example:

phishing site that impersonates a microsoft login:
View attachment 291797

After a quick analysis of SafeToOpen:
View attachment 291798

It basically says that the website is trying to impersonate the site live.com and is therefor blocked.
So it really is working well for me here. There is no other extension of this kind that I know of.

Thanks for the info.

 

[Sampei.Nihira]

Please forgive me if this question is intrusive.
Why are you using the Port Authority extension?

I have enabled this:

dev-platform@mozilla.org - Google Groups

about:config

network.lna.blocking set to true

Today I tried running this test without uBlock Origin:

Redirecting to http://samy.pl/webscan/

I'll insert the test for you (for privacy reasons, I've deleted the connections):



As you can see in the red arrow to the right of the Firefox browser development tools, connections have been blocked.

I can't know if your Firefox has the same settings as mine, so it would be helpful if you could run the same test and check.
Thank you for your attention and for any response.

 

[Kongo]

Please forgive me if this question is intrusive.
Why are you using the Port Authority extension?

I have enabled this:

dev-platform@mozilla.org - Google Groups

about:config

network.lna.blocking set to true

Today I tried running this test without uBlock Origin:

Redirecting to http://samy.pl/webscan/

I'll insert the test for you (for privacy reasons, I've deleted the connections):

View attachment 292236

As you can see in the red arrow to the right of the Firefox browser development tools, connections have been blocked.

I can't know if your Firefox has the same settings as mine, so it would be helpful if you could run the same test and check.
Thank you for your attention and for any response.

Hey @Sampei.Nihira

I am sorry but I am not quite sure what your question is... Are you wondering why I am using Port Authority as a standalone extension instead of uBlock Origin with the blocklist that does basically the same?

Edit:

I get it now. My bad. So basically both uBlock Origins blocklist and Port Authority are redundant if simply enabling this in about:config? Didn't know about that.. Thank you!

 

[Sampei.Nihira]

Hey @Sampei.Nihira

I am sorry but I am not quite sure what your question is... Are you wondering why I am using Port Authority as a standalone extension instead of uBlock Origin with the blocklist that does basically the same?

View attachment 292242

Edit:

I get it now. My bad. So basically both uBlock Origins blocklist and Port Authority are redundant if simply enabling this in about:config? Didn't know about that.. Thank you!

Yes, it's the same in Chrome/Edge too.
Have a nice day.

 

[Sampei.Nihira]

Hello, as always, sorry to bother you (I have no idea what the medium feedback is).

After scanning the HTTP ports, today I ran the WebSocket port test.
I removed uBo + my DNS filtering.



The conclusion is that PA is useless if the LNA setting is enabled.
I also enabled LNA trackers blocking, but I have no documentation on this.



P.S.

Only for the WebSocket test, I ran it again with LNA disabled, and the port scan was still blocked.
The HTTP ports test is also blocked without LNA enabled.
So FF protects, perhaps with the settings I use, without the need for PA.

Best regards.

 

[Kongo]

Hello, as always, sorry to bother you (I have no idea what the medium feedback is).

After scanning the HTTP ports, today I ran the WebSocket port test.
I removed uBo + my DNS filtering.

View attachment 292504

The conclusion is that PA is useless if the LNA setting is enabled.
I also enabled LNA trackers blocking, but I have no documentation on this.

View attachment 292505

P.S.

Only for the WebSocket test, I ran it again with LNA disabled, and the port scan was still blocked.
The HTTP ports test is also blocked without LNA enabled.
So FF protects, perhaps with the settings I use, without the need for PA.

Best regards.

Don't worry, you are not bothering me at all. Always looking forward to learning something new.

 

[Kongo]

- removed Port Authority and set "network.lna.blocking" to "true" in about:config

 

[Kongo]

I reset my PC and decided to play around with Smart App Control a little...
So:

- Smart App Control enabled
- replaced ProtonVPN with IVPN