loveboy_lion said:
Yes CIS I plenty for me The reason for trustport and and Kingsoft are
1) To backup CIS if in case comodo antivirus Misses anything (which in many case it does)
For Kingsoft i can understand, but Trustport...
2) I had 1 year trustport antivirus key which was getting wasted
So use Comodo Firewall instead of CIS, u will still have D+
3) Trustport consisting of duel engine ( bitdefender and Avg) Compensate to the misses by CIS
Comodo AV module is good enough to keep you clear from most malware. Kingsoft is enough , you dont need Trustport
4) Since My Wife uses my laptop a lot and her general computer knowledge is not that good i prefer it as a precaution since she clicks on each and every click possible without thinking and i cant afford to lose any data due to her ignorance
so you should remove CIS since it create yes or no popups , and her behavior will reduce your security at best, screw your system at worst.
Yes you are right BUT
If you install CIS first and then Install Trustport after 2-3 restarts then Cis Doesnt conflict with Trustport And Trustport doesnt conflict with CIS if you have added CIS files to Application inspector in trustport
You can't know for sure since TP is not designed for being a companion AV, the redundancies act in a deeper level. You feel nothing now, but later in case of infection you may see both AV fight each other to clean the malware.
Note: Comodo AV always comes into action before Trustport even in Manual scan so there isn't any problem since what CIS misses trustport catches
i know that CIS is fast , it is why on my system EAM is set to detect on execution , but EAM
is a companion AV
If i was in your situation, i will do like this:
Main AV : Trustport
Companion AV: Kingsoft
Firewall : Comodo Firewall
Then you don't have any potential conflicts and a lighter system. remember that having lot of RAM or a super CPU dont protect you from a slow responsive system.
I am well known on this forum to test many AV/suites together, so you can trust me