App Review McAfee Protection (Plus Plans, Total Protection, LiveSafe)

[rashmi]

You are looking on the main console. You need to open protection.mcafee.com

Does protection.mcafee.com offer limited or comprehensive settings?

 

[Szellem]

You are looking on the main console. You need to open protection.mcafee.com

Also, it’s not available in all regions/languages.

Is Scam Protection only available on phones, i.e. mobile phones? Not on Windows PCs?
My main screen or main console is different from yours. Why is that?

 

[Trident]

Is Scam Protection only available on phones, i.e. mobile phones? Not on Windows PCs?
My main screen or main console is different from yours. Why is that?

That wasn’t the main console that I displayed, it is the website protection.mcafee.com

Does protection.mcafee.com offer limited or comprehensive settings?

It offers the needed settings to get all features up and running, for example scam protection has 3 different aggression levels.
But nothing too comprehensive.

McAfee many years ago got rid of settings and the product is pretty much automated.
They used to have a ton of them.

 

[Virtuoso]

This is a random question, but last time I used McAfee, it flagged .nzb files as bad with no way to whitelist it. These files are used to download content from Usenet. Does anyone know if McAfee still exhibits this behavior?

Can anyone check if this still happens? @Trident I can send you .nzb file if you can check it?

Another query from me is regarding files downloaded via Internet Download Manager software, these files are not downloaded via browsers, so the extension will not scan them on download? From what I can read from people's comments, Mcaffee does not scan directly downloaded files.

 

[Trident]

Can anyone check if this still happens? @Trident I can send you .nzb file if you can check it?

Another query from me is regarding files downloaded via Internet Download Manager software, these files are not downloaded via browsers, so the extension will not scan them on download? From what I can read from people's comments, Mcaffee does not scan directly downloaded files.

You can send me nzb file, I’ve not encountered this extension before to be quite honest.

Yes, McAfee applies instant and more aggressive scan only on files originating from browsers (captured by the user mode extension).

Files originating from download managers, flash drives and so on are treated as local files — they will be scanned on access and with the standard GTI sensitivity level.

 

[TuxTalk]

You can send me nzb file, I’ve not encountered this extension before to be quite honest.

Yes, McAfee applies instant and more aggressive scan only on files originating from browsers (captured by the user mode extension).

Files originating from download managers, flash drives and so on are treated as local files — they will be scanned on access and with the standard GTI sensitivity level.

News bin file, you need a usenet account and any nzb downloader like SabNZB

 

[ForgottenSeer 94738]

McAfee wants to delete junk files and Windows junk files. What does McAfee define as junk? Is it possible to preview which files McAfee wants to delete?

 

[Trident]

McAfee wants to delete junk files and Windows junk files. What does McAfee define as junk? Is it possible to preview which files McAfee wants to delete?

It’s the files in %temp% and temp directories. Also, it wants to delete browser caches for which it asks to close any running browsers.

McAfee’s previous junk cleaner included registry cleaning as well. When they rewrote the product, they claimed over time, the new cleaner will be brought back to what it was.

The Tracker Remover feature in LiveSafe or Total Protection removes cookies and trackers. It helps you maintain your online privacy by automatically removing cookies and trackers that follow you as you browse the internet. You can use Tracker Remover if you've subscribed to LiveSafe or Total Protection.
Tracker Remover also helps to keep your PC running optimally by completely erasing temporary files, leaving no traces of them on your hard drive. The deleted data is unrecoverable, even by specialist data recovery software.

The new LiveSafe and Total Protection versions 16.0.103 and later, include a new implementation of Tracker Remover that's been redesigned to make it easier to use. However, the new Tracker Remover, it doesn't remove all the items that were removed in the legacy versions (16.0.53 and earlier) of our security apps for Windows. Below are the list of items that can be removed by the new Tracker Remover and the items that can't be removed now.

• Browser cookies and trackers
• Browser history
• Temporary files
• Recycle Bin items

• Registry
• Shortcuts
• Lost file fragments
• ActiveX controls
• Jump lists
• Flash and Silverlight cookies
• Memory image files
• Problem report files
• Thumbnail cache

Although we won't remove all these items now, we'll be gradually removing them over the next few quarters.

Why does the new Tracker Remover clean up fewer items than the legacy Tracker Remover?​

Because Tracker Remover has been rewritten, we have initially only added the most commonly removed items shown above. Some older legacy functionality hasn't been migrated to the new version in this initial release.

NOTE: Tracker Remover will be regularly updated over the next few months to align with Tracker Remover in the legacy McAfee security apps for Windows. We'll update this article as the new Tracker Remover features are added.

https://www.mcafee.com/support/s/article/000002152?language=en_US

 

[ForgottenSeer 94738]

@Trident
Thanks for the information!

 

[Trident]

Can anyone check if this still happens? @Trident I can send you .nzb file if you can check it?

Another query from me is regarding files downloaded via Internet Download Manager software, these files are not downloaded via browsers, so the extension will not scan them on download? From what I can read from people's comments, Mcaffee does not scan directly downloaded files.

I’ve tested the nzb file that you sent me, there are no detections.

 

[Trident]

@Harputlu , I think you mentioned when you tested McAfee, it didn’t even delete Eicar test file.

I just tested it now, it’s very difficult to even download Eicar, I had to press “Visit Site” on Web Advisor twice to even download it.

Anyway, I did download it and upon trying to open, it was deleted immediately.
Not sure what happened there.

 

[Harputlu]

@Harputlu , I think you mentioned when you tested McAfee, it didn’t even delete Eicar test file.

I just tested it now, it’s very difficult to even download Eicar, I had to press “Visit Site” on Web Advisor twice to even download it.

Anyway, I did download it and upon trying to open, it was deleted immediately.
Not sure what happened there.

I really don't know. The computer scan took a very long time. It could also be my fault. I am currently using G DATA. I can try again later.

 

[Virtuoso]

I’ve tested the nzb file that you sent me, there are no detections.

Thank you for testing that, now I have to decide what to do with direct downloads via download managers, usenet and torrents.

@Harputlu , I think you mentioned when you tested McAfee, it didn’t even delete Eicar test file.

I just tested it now, it’s very difficult to even download Eicar, I had to press “Visit Site” on Web Advisor twice to even download it.

Anyway, I did download it and upon trying to open, it was deleted immediately.
Not sure what happened there.

If you look at his earlier post, he said " it didn't delete the Eichar file. It deleted it when I scanned the computer". Looks like direct download scenario where Mcafee does not scan the file automatically and upon manual scan it was removed: App Review - McAfee Protection (Plus Plans, Total Protection, LiveSafe)

 

[Trident]

Thank you for testing that, now I have to decide what to do with direct downloads via download managers, usenet and torrents.



If you look at his earlier post, he said " it didn't delete the Eichar file. It deleted it when I scanned the computer". Looks like direct download scenario where Mcafee does not scan the file automatically and upon manual scan it was removed: App Review - McAfee Protection (Plus Plans, Total Protection, LiveSafe)

McAfee scans on access. So you need to try access the file. The rest is scanned immediately, when downloaded. This scenario reduces the performance impact and still ensures malware doesn’t activate.

Eicar would be removed when you try to open it or when you do a scan. Looks like McAfee is making some adjustments for archiving/unarchiving as well to trigger monitoring, but it’s not ready yet.

People who prefer every mouse hover to trigger a scan, McAfee can’t provide that.

 

[ForgottenSeer 123960]

Hello guys and welcome to this McAfee review.

Before we get to the McAfee details (which will be discussed in great depth), I would like to discuss the upgrade to my practices across this forum.

This forum is not for promotion of favouritism, it is designed mainly as a technical and objective forum.
In the light of all that, I have created Trident Review Framework (TRF) 1.0 with several key highlights:

• Software is reviewed objectively based on capabilities and performance.
• Wherever threat detection levels are measured (or tested), I focus on realistic scenarios and broad coverage.
• Committed to transparency: wherever threat detection tests are performed, hashes of the malware are provided (as much as possible), so users can test the same software or other software, as long as they know how to do it safely and securely.
• Malware is pre-checked, hunted fresh (as much as possible) and guaranteed to be malicious. Malware of different types is tested.
• Wherever the security software offers more aggressive downloads scanning (which is many solutions nowadays), malware is downloaded in realistic scenarios, giving the solution a chance to react.
• When additional components such as email protection are offered, these are welcome. Malware (and all trouble really) comes mainly through the web and email. These are tested too.
• When it comes to privacy, I have already created another thread here: Serious Discussion - Data Collection Core Principles (Security Software)
• Generative AI (namely Gemini 2.5 Pro which I also use in programming) is heavily used in my research, as well as in various other tasks, such as converting antivirus logs to tables, researching patents and so on. This allows me to do more work in a shorter time.

These are the upgrades to my review practices. I am not aiming to become a reviewer number one, in fact, @Shadowra handles most of the tests excellently, editing videos and producing high number of them. This is something that I will never do, I simply lack the time of it. Hence, I will not be producing a bulk of these reviews, rather, I will be reviewing products that have attracted my interest. For them to attract my interest, they are guaranteed to be advanced. Requests for reviews should still be addressed to @Shadowra.
You can expect reviews from me every now and then, mainly when misinformation has to be combatted.

CHAPTER 1: The theory

McAfee around 2022 upgraded the products to a new cloud-based architecture. They rewrote the whole product and there were several support articles. Thread wad created by me here New Update - The new cloud-based McAfee

Since then the support articles have been deleted by McAfee.

Nevertheless, the new architecture has several key highlights:

• Less reliant on own kernel drivers, uses Windows native components as much as possible: McAfee uses the Defender Firewall for static rules and adds on top domain/web reputation. It also uses the Windows Filtering Platform to facilitate the malicious traffic interception.
• No "signatures" as in no malware fragments. McAfee uses highly efficient heuristic/generic detections, as well as local trust and machine learning models and YARA rules to detect malware offline. It's important to note that if you are testing McAfee with fresh malware from several websites we've all come to know, you can't expect offline detection. The offline detection will be only on old and well-known malware. Such software that is light, efficient, disconnected from the cloud and yet detects everything simply doesn't exist.
• Upgraded cloud, this was reflected in my McAfee deep research here: Serious Discussion - Deep Research: McAfee GTI, JTI, Artemis and Other Technologies Explained
• The new architecture creates a very lightweight product, see the performance section for details.
• McAfee offers many features that extend the protection, such as email scanning and deep fake detection. These features solve real problems for real users, beyond detecting malware which Microsoft Defender can do too.
• Heavily focused on machine learning and AI. Recent patents tell us more about McAfee focus
  

  Patent Title	Publication Number	Date (YYYY-MM-DD)	Brief Description
  --- 2024 ---
  Systems and Methods for Providing User Experiences on AR/VR Systems	US-20240060933-A1	2024-02-22	Manages security and privacy within augmented or virtual reality environments.
  Methods and Apparatus for Comprehensive User-Centric Protection	US-20240034800-A1	2024-02-01	Creates a personalized security posture based on a user's digital assets and risk profile across devices.
  Systems and methods for detecting deepfake artifacts	US-20240012586-A1	2024-01-11	Analyzes media files for subtle inconsistencies and artifacts to identify AI-generated deepfakes.
  --- 2023 ---
  Visual Detection of Phishing Websites via Headless Browser	US-20230396013-A1	2023-12-07	Uses a non-graphical browser to analyze the visual components of a webpage to determine if it's a phishing site.
  Systems and Methods for Performing Multi-Faceted Security Scanning	US-20230349887-A1	2023-11-02	Implements a multi-layered scanning approach to detect diverse and complex security threats.
  Device Reputation Score Based on Device Vitals	US-20230282672-A1	2023-09-07	Calculates a real-time trust score for a device based on its security health, software, and behavior.
  In-Place Cloud Instance Restore	US-20230205562-A1	2023-06-29	Provides a method to restore a compromised cloud computing instance directly, minimizing downtime.
  Dynamic Process Criticality Scoring	US-20230185984-A1	2023-06-15	Assigns a real-time risk score to running processes to prioritize security actions.
  Visual Identification of Malware	US-20230089868-A1	2023-03-23	Converts malware code into a visual representation (an image) to use image analysis for faster detection.
  Methods and systems for cloud native threat detection	US-20230070151-A1	2023-03-02	Provides threat detection specifically designed for the architecture of cloud-native applications (containers, etc.).
  Icon Based Phishing Detection	US-20230047306-A1	2023-02-16	Detects phishing attempts by analyzing the favicon or other icons associated with a website.
  --- 2022 ---
  Method and Apparatus for Hardware Based File/Document Expiry Timer	US-20220399433-A1	2022-12-15	Enforces document access expiry dates using hardware-level security, making it harder to bypass.
  Systems and Methods for Utilizing Hardware Assisted Protection	US-20220366299-A1	2022-11-17	Leverages specialized hardware security features (like Intel SGX) to protect applications and data.
  Threat Hunting Using Natural Language Processing	US-11451613-B2	2022-09-20	Enables security analysts to search for threats in datasets using plain English queries instead of complex code.
  Multi-Dimensional Malware Analysis	US-20220261685-A1	2022-08-18	Utilizes machine learning to analyze malware across multiple dimensions (code, behavior, network) for classification.
  Systems and methods for mitigating against malicious scripts	US-11394801-B2	2022-07-19	Detects and neutralizes malicious scripts (e.g., Magecart) designed to steal payment info from web forms.
  Detecting Grammatical Artifacts of Machine-Translated Phishing Websites	US-20220191398-A1	2022-06-16	Identifies phishing sites by spotting grammatical errors characteristic of automated translation tools.
  Systems and Methods for Monitoring IoT Device Baseline	US-11356453-B2	2022-06-07	Establishes a normal behavior baseline for IoT devices and flags anomalous activity as a potential threat.
  Methods and Systems for Detecting Ransomware	US-20220078235-A1	2022-03-10	Employs behavioral analysis to detect and block ransomware activity before significant encryption occurs.

• Local Intelligence Explained:
• AV Trust: whitelist for Neo engine, 6.49 KB in size.
• Neo Core: the main engine, includes true file type detection, unpacking and the Neo host (12.7 MB total size).
• Neo rules: these are heuristic rules for the Neo engine, compressed from 20.9 MB in a cab file that is 3.5 MB. Whilst some heuristics could be ran on the code, majority of AV heuristics are usually ran on behaviour, which means the Neo engine is responsible for file emulation as well.
• Neo trust: these are exceptions from the heuristic rules, 9.99MB compressed to 2.4MB
• Real Protect Core - these are the core behavioural monitoring machine learning models, just over 13 MB
• Real Protect Non-PE - these are machine learning modules mainly for DLL modules, 2.7 MB
• Real Protect Script - these are machine learning models involved in the detection of scripts (during runtime), probably focusing on suspicious, long encoded commands and so on.
• Real Protect Static - machine learning models facilitating Pre-Execution (static analysis) on scripts, modules and portable executables, 11.7 MB.
• TPX (according to McAfee these are the main AV generic detections), 35.7 MB -> these are updated often, if not daily
• TPX-1, these are the YARA rules (according to the configuration file), compressed from 20 MB to 3.2 MB -> these are updated often if not daily
• TRS, that's another part of the AV engine, 10.3 MB -> this seems to be updated every few days
• OpenVino-based DeepFake detection models, optimised for various CPUs (McAfee just recently launched that and is still working to increase availability), just over 50 MB
• McAfee also offers ransomware remediation/restoration

Apart from the local intelligence which is mainly used offline, McAfee is in constant connection with the cloud. TLSH (Trend Micro Locality Sensitive Hash) is used, don't be surprised by the name, it is quite popular and widely used to allow minor, local changes to files, to not void the cloud detection. The distance between 2 TLSH hashes is calculated to establish the file similarity level. TLSH is also part of the STIX standard.
TLSH is better than other methods such as SSDEEP, mainly because SSDEEP struggles with small files. McAfee also uses server-side machine learning.

Several of the new patents explain the McAfee multi-faceted approach in depth, McAfee combines online and offline reputation, heavily focused on multiple different types of machine learning, and also takes into account the file origin when taking a decision.

CHAPTER 2: Antivirus Test
McAfee was tested in the continuation of a few days. To make the test more interesting, executables were tested twice - once original, as they are and once modified. Scripts were modified to include custom functions/subs.

File Name	Detection Name	Final Detection Source	TLSH	Date
1c8071c09a7f4b7bce1339b71d2522547aae5b41ed8d80a821a990a2f2b991fc.js	Trojan:Script/STRRAT.DA	neo	N/A	2025-07-08
9ce142439e553f047639d272975b85c41da29191e532348f00653723e7f00299.bat	ti!9CE142439E55	hti	N/A	2025-07-08
b97cd404ceab09bdd92003599566d946cead1d5d5dba528327821fe4f18108ec.msi	ti!B97CD404CEAB	hti	N/A	2025-07-08
63d2e9f885c7b2df3fc23658a5c13d3df968fbe205d9c973f4f42c775bd787af.exe	ti!63D2E9F885C7	hti	T13C55...1463E7A3	2025-07-08
2f0f2cdc865f7769b831943e2edb2a3090c3de28e45cb583a695257a6b771f3a.msi	ti!2F0F2CDC865F	hti	N/A	2025-07-08
2f0f2cdc865f7769b831943e2edb2a3090c3de28e45cb583a695257a6b771f3a.msi	ti!2F0F2CDC865F	hti	N/A	2025-07-08
ca9d03df1842fbec86ce1be7fd74318cefaa44e61047c9667b3cc60667f0f9d9.exe	ti!CA9D03DF1842	hti	T1AFB4...05A823AF	2025-07-08
2f0f2cdc865f7769b831943e2edb2a3090c3de28e45cb583a695257a6b771f3a.msi	Cache!257a6b771f3a	cache	N/A	2025-07-08
ae4e172d659cdd1fb298a4bb02f361ac8db869e78cdfe5f4e21741337b088845.exe	ti!AE4E172D659C	hti	N/A	2025-07-08
6d7bd0f24261739722d0d052000ea27767c6b73446aa5d0dd8d2b9b39a105563.vbe	ti!6D7BD0F24261	hti	N/A	2025-07-08
6d7bd0f24261739722d0d052000ea27767c6b73446aa5d0dd8d2b9b39a105563.vbe	ti!6D7BD0F24261	hti	N/A	2025-07-08
6d7bd0f24261739722d0d052000ea27767c6b73446aa5d0dd8d2b9b39a105563.vbe	ti!6D7BD0F24261	hti	N/A	2025-07-08
d82bd404ae9e2a0e63509e6d4114cd139f029f6c27b30d5cde0713fe54f543eb.exe	ti!D82BD404AE9E	hti	T185E4...39F141E2	2025-07-08
19b6c6f8da4dd0a883cc647f0c5eaedd01a0bc1758beba1c8f9f97f4335b1f58.zip	ti!19B6C6F8DA4D	hti	N/A	2025-07-08
c4c2a82a7d454bb85fa22f12d2571639c1640ba4a6790d708f4a229f91a7a99b.exe	ti!C4C2A82A7D45	hti	N/A	2025-07-08
ddd77057aed66ecef36d3b3997694acca1c72d4d23c32c684b9dff50e385b880.exe	ti!DDD77057AED6	hti	N/A	2025-07-10
ddd77057aed66ecef36d3b3997694acca1c72d4d23c32c684b9dff50e385b880.exe	Real Protect-LS!c16f81a15b2a	rp-s	N/A	2025-07-10
7fc0bcc654d5369fa6a18661eddfd91f058db076559f4517f0dd21f674d2fa3c.js	ti!7FC0BCC654D5	hti	N/A	2025-07-10
7fc0bcc654d5369fa6a18661eddfd91f058db076559f4517f0dd21f674d2fa3c.js	Trojan:Script/Downloadagent.I	neo	N/A	2025-07-10
6caa23ad0e1f8b3cbfc3ec44de9bebfc53660a58df76f4756539edd5fdafee76.vbs	Trojan:Script/ObfuBAT.EOFF	neo	N/A	2025-07-10
6caa23ad0e1f8b3cbfc3ec44de9bebfc53660a58df76f4756539edd5fdafee76.vbs	Trojan:Script/ObfuBAT.EOFF	neo	N/A	2025-07-10
ab0105ec57d87547362920516f6374f729f046f1a722eef189a1ef2d813ba00a.exe	ti!AB0105EC57D8	hti	T1C725...2525EA73	2025-07-10
fecd05a391d8dc00fc236e0808f8191bbcaee0f1b41b55d40f4c725f71f04848.zip	Trojan:Win/suspiciousLnk.C	neo	N/A	2025-07-12
ab0105ec57d87547362920516f6374f729f046f1a722eef189a1ef2d813ba00a.exe	hti!1dddaaaa	hti	T1C725...2525EA73	2025-07-12
70a92cdcd65bad4c5ed38adf340d5123944acde22d94c44df7ee8178f778d761.cmd	ti!70A92CDCD65B	hti	N/A	2025-07-12
70a92cdcd65bad4c5ed38adf340d5123944acde22d94c44df7ee8178f778d761.cmd	Trojan:Script/SuspiciousBat.A!2	neo	N/A	2025-07-12
wscript.exe	ti!AD5039A88038	rp-d	N/A	2025-07-12
c5be4a627fe03ecc5c3768b579c77fc12b1a52738dfb7c0a5a2ee0fa122c28ac.exe	ti!C5BE4A627FE0	hti	T101C5...29F1E332	2025-07-12
c5be4a627fe03ecc5c3768b579c77fc12b1a52738dfb7c0a5a2ee0fa122c28ac.exe	ti!4BDF1C5B280B	rp-s	T1C8C5...29F1E332	2025-07-12
c5be4a627fe03ecc5c3768b579c77fc12b1a52738dfb7c0a5a2ee0fa122c28ac.exe	ti!4BDF1C5B280B	rp-s	T1C8C5...29F1E332	2025-07-12
c5be4a627fe03ecc5c3768b579c77fc12b1a52738dfb7c0a5a2ee0fa122c28ac.exe	hti!1dae93a9	hti	T101C5...29F1E332	2025-07-12
6981d8702172dc39f302bdeb4917c0eb49f7c37b2a90bee41f64ccecc7e9497d.exe	ti!DEAC7649D369	rp-s	T11155...2521E673	2025-07-14
6981d8702172dc39f302bdeb4917c0eb49f7c37b2a90bee41f64ccecc7e9497d.exe	ti!DEAC7649D369	rp-s	T11155...2521E673	2025-07-14
r189722c5-ba5c-4822-ab5d-7359af018697r.js	Trojan:Script/GenericYJ.BBC	neo	N/A	2025-07-15
6981d8702172dc39f302bdeb4917c0eb49f7c37b2a90bee41f64ccecc7e9497d.exe	ti!6981D8702172	hti	T19C55...2521E673	2025-07-15
9b757a3dbb96ff7cbea3853bdea20cbf954add2f6a2f6cebb2d0d5f0c137c0d8.exe	ti!9B757A3DBB96	rp-s	T16715...016CF08F	2025-07-15
968396ee196be287ac6de30d897f7e84570eb5a297642a32d7300826241349bb.exe	ti!968396EE196B	hti	N/A	2025-07-15
968396ee196be287ac6de30d897f7e84570eb5a297642a32d7300826241349bb.exe	ti!0CBCDA1CFD01	rp-s	N/A	2025-07-15
x.exe	ti!8C874AE8B5B3	rp-s	T18E75...06A29763	2025-07-15
x.exe	ti!8C874AE8B5B3	rp-s	T18E75...06A29763	2025-07-15
x.exe	ti!8C874AE8B5B3	rp-s	T18E75...06A29763	2025-07-15
404f55e7aa854f7df700f2b93b4a31d0f13dde464e74985ca9bc98ba6224cc93.exe	ti!404F55E7AA85	hti	N/A	2025-07-15
tier0.dll	ti!95829D5ACF78	hti	N/A	2025-07-15
968396ee196be287ac6de30d897f7e84570eb5a297642a32d7300826241349bb.exe	hti!968cc448	hti	N/A	2025-07-15
b501e17e249221d34a618e288e0e9a75933cea9894ec11fdcd45c0663d95eeb6.vbs	VBS/Generic.c	av	N/A	2025-07-15

McAfee detects all malware early, pre-execution (just 2-3 detections were post-execution) and leaves clean system, confirmed by Norton Power Eraser and MalwareBytes.
The tests are ongoing, but it's clear that the new architecture offers efficient security.
View attachment 289638
rare instance of post-execution fileless malware block

*It's important to note that in a real world scenario, McAfee would never allow someone to download large amount of malware. From the quick web test, I wasn't able to download any.


Phishing Detection Test Coming Soon on the same thread.
View attachment 289637View attachment 289639

Scam/SPAM email test:
In addition to handling files and web well, McAfee provides email protection for Outlook, Yahoo and Gmail. The protection does not scan emails that's already marked as spam. It only scans emails that pass the initial filtration. I composed several realistic scenarios, including Taylor Swift being in love with me and getting "a massive pay rise" with infostealer attached as a contract. McAfee blocked the scams. It's important to note that marketing emails containing language like "hurry up, offer expires", are not McAfee Anti-Scam's favourite and are also being flagged.

View attachment 289633View attachment 289634View attachment 289635View attachment 289636

Removing emails of this sort aids malware detection and overall protection, including for unsuspecting users finances.

DeepFake detection: I don't really know where I can find deep fakes, so I turned to YouTube. Unfortunately, they are not that many and quite short, but they were identified based on audio patterns.
View attachment 289641

Now let's get to perhaps the most important.

CHAPTER 3: Performance impact
Loading the interface CPU Usage: 6-7% for a few seconds
Scan with fast scanning enabled: 75% CPU usage
Scan with fast scan disabled: 20-30% CPU usage
Quick Scan duration: less than a minute
Full scan duration: <10 minutes
Observed Maximum memory usage: 270 MB (right after a scan)
Observed minimum memory usage: 160 MB (idle)
Observed CPU usage in idle: <1%
Observed CPU usage whilst opening popular and unpopular apps: <5%
System feels responsive and boots fast: yes

Additional features that may be useful:
Breach monitoring, VPN, data shredder.
Cyber-theft insurance on more expensive plans available.

Cons: the Mac protection is not migrated to the new architecture.

Final verdict: TRF approved and recommended for all types of users.

This review is an excellent, detailed, and transparent look at the McAfee product. It does a great job of blending a user's perspective with a deep technical analysis, which results in a high-quality assessment. The methodology is thorough and credible for a forum-based review, which lends credibility to Trident's positive verdict.

 

[LucciousX]

Anyone Using McAfee on a Gaming PC? Need Some Insight

I’ve got a McAfee license but haven’t installed it yet—still deciding if I should. I’ve been using Windows Defender for the past year since I mostly game on my PC. It’s been okay, but I’m looking for something that gives me more control and is possibly lighter on system resources during gameplay.

I’ve seen a few claims that McAfee is actually less taxing than Defender when gaming, but I’m not sure how true that is. Has anyone here used it for gaming? Especially with online games?

For some background:

• I used to love Kaspersky, but since it got banned here in the U.S., going back isn’t an option.
• I then tried Bitdefender, which was solid—until it started blocking some of my games (like Overwatch and Valorant) and adding exceptions didn’t help. Also bitdefender would randomly disappear from the task bar corner. It was just weird. And the booting would take way longer for some reason.
• That led me to settle on Defender, which has been stable for the most part. I’m just not fully convinced yet.

So now I’m wondering—is McAfee worth trying on a gaming setup? Or should I just stick with Defender or look into something else? Maybe I’ll go back to Bitdefender if the new version is lighter! I just don’t know.

 

[ForgottenSeer 116559]

Anyone Using McAfee on a Gaming PC? Need Some Insight

I’ve got a McAfee license but haven’t installed it yet—still deciding if I should. I’ve been using Windows Defender for the past year since I mostly game on my PC. It’s been okay, but I’m looking for something that gives me more control and is possibly lighter on system resources during gameplay.

I’ve seen a few claims that McAfee is actually less taxing than Defender when gaming, but I’m not sure how true that is. Has anyone here used it for gaming? Especially with online games?

For some background:

• I used to love Kaspersky, but since it got banned here in the U.S., going back isn’t an option.
• I then tried Bitdefender, which was solid—until it started blocking some of my games (like Overwatch and Valorant) and adding exceptions didn’t help. Also bitdefender would randomly disappear from the task bar corner. It was just weird. And the booting would take way longer for some reason.
• That led me to settle on Defender, which has been stable for the most part. I’m just not fully convinced yet.

So now I’m wondering—is McAfee worth trying on a gaming setup? Or should I just stick with Defender or look into something else? Maybe I’ll go back to Bitdefender if the new version is lighter! I just don’t know.

The latest McAfee runs super light on my system as many others report. It's been perfectly stable and compatible in my configuration—as Trident pointed out, the security suite has barely any presence in the kernel left. Detection has improved by leaps and bounds with promise of even greater capabilities judging by recent patents.

MS Defender plays well with other software but isn't always the lightest. You'll have to try the new McAfee and judge for yourself. It's quick to install and painless to completely uninstall in my experience.

 

[LucciousX]

The latest McAfee runs super light on my system as many others report. It's been perfectly stable and compatible in my configuration—as Trident pointed out, the security suite has barely any presence in the kernel left. Detection has improved by leaps and bounds with promise of even greater capabilities judging by recent patents.

MS Defender plays well with other software but isn't always the lightest. You'll have to try the new McAfee and judge for yourself. It's quick to install and painless to completely uninstall in my experience.

Appreciate your insight! Thanks a lot!

 

[superleeds27]

Changelog for R132 has dropped

McAfee R132 更新_McAfee_国外杀毒软件 卡饭论坛 - 互助分享 - 大气谦和!

帖子《McAfee R132 更新》，，来自《McAfee》，国外杀毒软件，《卡饭论坛》

bbs.kafan.cn

1. The neo engine module is further integrated.

2. The system built-in decompression function decompression scanning is back.

3. The error in the quarantine area prompt text is still not fixed.

 

[piquiteco]

Appreciate your insight! Thanks a lot!

McAfee is now super fast and super lightweight, taking less than two minutes to install. It has been completely redesigned and is highly effective against malware. Furthermore, I recommend that you try the new McAfee and judge for yourself, as our friend @Miravi said in post #137.