New CCleaner version out

  • Thread starter ForgottenSeer 69673
  • Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
F

ForgottenSeer 69673

Thread author
Just got an update of CCleaner.

ScreenHunter_129 Nov. 29 17.13.jpg
 

_CyberGhosT_

Level 53
Verified
Honorary Member
Top Poster
Content Creator
Well-known
Aug 2, 2015
4,286
Last edited:

Vasudev

Level 33
Verified
Nov 8, 2014
2,251
Try this Privacy Eraser: 1-click browsing history deletion, PC optimization & more
Even the free will impress you, 99% accessable, paid only unlocks the Security lvl for deletion (passes)
I only use this now, even Kerish is out the door on my Windows sys. Stay Frosty
PS: it even auto cleans the browser at close for you, like CC does.
Was that SW formerly called Tracks Eraser pro?
CCleaner is for registry cleaning after uninstall some apps. I'm worried that new update might break it.
 

SumTingWong

Level 28
Verified
Top Poster
Well-known
Apr 2, 2018
1,782
Was that SW formerly called Tracks Eraser pro?
CCleaner is for registry cleaning after uninstall some apps. I'm worried that new update might break it.

Registry cleaners are snake oil. They cause more harm than good. I don't use registry cleaner feature or tick registry option in Wise Disk Cleaner and Privacy Eraser. I haven't used CCleaner registry cleaner at all.

No matter how accurate CCleaner registry cleaner feature is, I will not recommend to use it because it is not perfect. There will be a flaw somewhere and there. Even us humans are not perfect, so let alone software and things we created.
 

Stopspying

Level 19
Verified
Top Poster
Well-known
Jan 21, 2018
814
Thanks. Its time to stick with 5.33 version.
I'm with you on using an older (safer) version of CCleaner after the new owners were proved not to be trusted in the same way that Piriform were.

I've played around with a few older versions recently, nothing too scientific, but found that different versions in the v5.30-5.36 range produced varying results with the same settings. v5.36 missed lots of browser temporary files that other versions cleaned up. I'm wondering if CCleaner wasn't as good as many of us thought for some time. I'm currently using v5.30 alongside occasional sweeps with Bleachbit and Wise Care 365, they all clean some data that the others miss.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vasudev

Moonhorse

Level 38
Verified
Top Poster
Content Creator
Well-known
May 29, 2018
2,728
I'm with you on using an older (safer) version of CCleaner after the new owners were proved not to be trusted in the same way that Piriform were.

I've played around with a few older versions recently, nothing too scientific, but found that different versions in the v5.30-5.36 range produced varying results with the same settings. v5.36 missed lots of browser temporary files that other versions cleaned up. I'm wondering if CCleaner wasn't as good as many of us thought for some time. I'm currently using v5.30 alongside occasional sweeps with Bleachbit and Wise Care 365, they all clean some data that the others miss.
Privazer is pretty nice (y)
 
5

509322

Thread author
I'm with you on using an older (safer) version of CCleaner after the new owners were proved not to be trusted in the same way that Piriform were.

I've played around with a few older versions recently, nothing too scientific, but found that different versions in the v5.30-5.36 range produced varying results with the same settings. v5.36 missed lots of browser temporary files that other versions cleaned up. I'm wondering if CCleaner wasn't as good as many of us thought for some time. I'm currently using v5.30 alongside occasional sweeps with Bleachbit and Wise Care 365, they all clean some data that the others miss.

Wise Care can be hacked, Privazer can be hacked, Bleachbit can be hacked, and so on, and so on, and so on. No different than CCleaner. Sorry. That's just how it is.

Who owned CCleaner at the time of the embed is irrelevant because Avast just held the title to the company. The systems that Piriform had in-place were the ones compromised. So the people at Piriform are wholly to blame, if you're looking to blame the parties responsible on the defense side. Avast certainly didn't have anything to do with it. It just merely purchased the CCleaner product and Piriform company. Buying Piriform didn't magically open up security holes. Those holes existed prior to Avast's arrival on the scene.
 
F

ForgottenSeer 69673

Thread author
Wise Care can be hacked, Privazer can be hacked, Bleachbit can be hacked, and so on, and so on, and so on. No different than CCleaner. Sorry. That's just how it is.

Who owned CCleaner at the time of the embed is irrelevant because Avast just held the title to the company. The systems that Piriform had in-place were the ones compromised. So the people at Piriform are wholly to blame, if you're looking to blame the parties responsible on the defense side. Avast certainly didn't have anything to do with it. It just merely purchased the CCleaner product and Piriform company. Buying Piriform didn't magically open up security holes. Those holes existed prior to Avast's arrival on the scene.

Nicely said Lockdown
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

About us

  • MalwareTips is a community-driven platform providing the latest information and resources on malware and cyber threats. Our team of experienced professionals and passionate volunteers work to keep the internet safe and secure. We provide accurate, up-to-date information and strive to build a strong and supportive community dedicated to cybersecurity.

User Menu

Follow us

Follow us on Facebook or Twitter to know first about the latest cybersecurity incidents and malware threats.

Top