D
Deleted member 178
bogdan said:Malware Defender works more in the lines of a classic HIPS application. It can provide an excellent level of protection if used by a knowledgeable user with lots of spare time to set-up rules . CIS is suited for a wider audience. CIS should achieve 340/340 on the CLT test... maybe switch CIS to proactive security?
agree, and the classic mistake when using CLT is let the AV and Comodo Sandbox active.
ocsi said:But, MDL test (Malware Domain List) makes sense? Detection rate Avast Free + Malware Defender > CIS!
of course avast has better Detection, but CIS is better on prevention, concerning MDL i prefer Malc0de, their list is more recent. and has less errors.