thats true, but its not inclued in the free version. and the anti-exe blocks almost everything and isnt mature. n.nvt can say what he want. the endproduct is just not that good as hes saying. i would say qihoo and many other avs are way better than panda, proactive and detection wise.
Not trying to discredit you, but:
n.nvt can say what he want. the endproduct is just not that good who said its good? I never said that.
I said they are a top brand as a company, and they play with the big boys due to their innovation and such.
But since we are at the question:
the endproduct is just not that good Sure fine ill go with that.... But wait? Could you tell me by what standard? Your standard? a sample pack standard? Or is it the standard set by AV testing companies who have rated Panda at least in the sub top (Or better) for years now Or is it your own experience and that of a hand full of users who failed to understand the program and to maintain the standard computer ABC practice?.
Just wondering.....