Software Review Quick Heal vs Siyano Antivirus: Who Survives 100 Malware Attacks?

[Khushal]

Content source

https://youtu.be/tLvTqjHboO4

 

[Trident]

Battle of the two titans

 

[Parkinsond]

Battle of the two titans

71% for quickheal vs 75% for siyano

 

[Trident]

71% for quickheal vs 75% for siyano

So which one will you but first?

 

[Parkinsond]

So which one will you but first?

I would rather use none of them and rely on common sense; it will be a waste of PC resources.
Quickheal scored 93% in the latest AVC test; Siyano never encountered before among the test results of the common lab tests.

 

[stonjean633]

Battle of the two titans

Oh man....this is tough....

 

[Digmor Crusher]

71% for quickheal vs 75% for siyano

Thanks for that, means I don't have to watch now.

 

[ForgottenSeer 114717]

Quickheal scored 93% in the latest AVC test.

And yet so many people "depend" upon AV-C test results to guide them. A sure sign that those people don't know enough. For the typical person that does not know enough, those tests are misleading.

 

[Parkinsond]

And yet so many people "depend" upon AV-C test results to guide them. A sure sign that those people don't know enough. For the typical person that does not know enough, those tests are misleading.

As if NB InfoTech is more reliable source than AVC!

 

[ForgottenSeer 114717]

As if NB InfoTech is more reliable source than AVC!

I never explicitly stated nor implied that NB InfoTech is a more reliable source than AV-C. Since NB InfoTech is a Youtube tester, they - as an entire group - are automatically not reliable by default.

It is not really a question of "Are AV test labs more reliable than Youtube testers?"

The real problem is that the viewers of test videos and readers of test reports do not know enough about what AV test labs and Youtube testers do, how they do it, what their results mean, and most importantly what they do not mean.