Real-World Protection Test February 2018

No comments on Microsoft?

Clipboard01.jpg
 
here is the new Real-World Protection Test February 2018 from av-c

Real-World Protection Test - AV-Comparatives

https://www.av-comparatives.org/wp-content/...heet2018_02.pdf

take it with a grain of salt :)

Grain? Take it with an entire salt plains...

Especially since the worst infected machines I've ever seen are almost always Symantec/Norton. Or how the short 3 weeks we used F-Secure, and my son was using it we had threats walk right through it, yet this claims 100% protection. Or how a malicious actor was able to fully replace Trend Core Services on our systems to use Trend itself to exfiltrate data. I would strongly suggest these tests are largely useless.

But how can Microsoft get 100% without anti-phishing-protection? :unsure:

Stop asking questions that make sense. Also if anyone believes Microsoft offers anything even remotely close to 100% protection then please contact me. I have some amazing beach front property in Malibu you can have for $500.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It's good to see that none of the tested products scored under 95% and almost all of them are in 98-100% range.
One might get a different impression if he doesn't look at the chart attentively. :)

But still, I do have my huge bag of salt with me just like everyone else on the topic :D Might even start making circles with it for additional layer of protection :LOL: :LOL:
 
Last edited: