Rebel4Life Laptop
- Thread starter rebel4life
- Start date
- Sep 30, 2012
- 667
RE: Rebel4Life Machine
oh does EAM Internet Security helps with keyloggers i didnt know that thanks and mostly my browsers and DNS so far its been about a month and no problems just my firewall blocking bad sites
oh does EAM Internet Security helps with keyloggers i didnt know that thanks and mostly my browsers and DNS so far its been about a month and no problems just my firewall blocking bad sites
RE: Rebel4Life Machine
Here is my opinion on the On Demand Scanners:
TrendMicro House Call: Poor detection rate compared to ESET and EAM, therefore it is obsolete.
BitDefender Online Scanner: Since EAM is already running, it is pointless using BD since EAM has BD signatures + has way better removal capabilities.
If you really want an On Demand Scanner: MBAM Free would be enough. HMP if you want to have a 4th option.
Here is my opinion on the On Demand Scanners:
TrendMicro House Call: Poor detection rate compared to ESET and EAM, therefore it is obsolete.
BitDefender Online Scanner: Since EAM is already running, it is pointless using BD since EAM has BD signatures + has way better removal capabilities.
If you really want an On Demand Scanner: MBAM Free would be enough. HMP if you want to have a 4th option.
RE: Rebel4Life Machine
As long as you exclude both from each other, they live in harmony.
Known combo which has been used by loveboy_lion, Umbra and I for example.
One thing tho is the RAM usage of this combo.
EAM brings BB to the table whilst ESET 6 HIPS are not fully functional.
EAM also brings other aspects to the table which ESET lacks + BD engine.
I will wait to see if I indeed posted here and it is missing due to the upgrade or it is a dejavu.
If it was a dejavu, ill explain the flaws on the current RT with On Demand choice OP has.
ZOU1 said:
As long as you exclude both from each other, they live in harmony.
Known combo which has been used by loveboy_lion, Umbra and I for example.
One thing tho is the RAM usage of this combo.
EAM brings BB to the table whilst ESET 6 HIPS are not fully functional.
EAM also brings other aspects to the table which ESET lacks + BD engine.
I will wait to see if I indeed posted here and it is missing due to the upgrade or it is a dejavu.
If it was a dejavu, ill explain the flaws on the current RT with On Demand choice OP has.
Gnosis
Level 5
- Apr 26, 2011
- 2,779
RE: Rebel4Life Machine
Fascinating.
Wouldn't it make more since to go to CIS? To each their own, but it seems like it would have the same benefits and seems to protect well.
I guess when you have insane RAM, it makes no difference. hehe (membership has its privileges, lol)
Fascinating.
Wouldn't it make more since to go to CIS? To each their own, but it seems like it would have the same benefits and seems to protect well.
I guess when you have insane RAM, it makes no difference. hehe (membership has its privileges, lol)
RE: Rebel4Life Machine
Depends what you are looking for.
I went ESET AV + EAM for this reason: Behavior Blocker.
Soon ditched ESET to EAM as of version 7 but then removed due to some ram usage.
EAM has spikes of RAM usage whilst ESET is stable. Adding all up is fine on a 4GB RAM system. I got 6 and is more than enough but when you mix in 2 game clients is when every little RAM counts.
In a nutshell, pros and cons:
ESET AV w/ EAM combo:
+ESET w/ Emsisoft w/ BitDefender signatures
+ESET HIPS w/ EAM Behavior Blocker (On version 6 RC is simply BB since ESET HIPS is not fully operational)
+EAM Removal Capabilities
+EAM HOSTS file option protection
+ESET w/ EAM web protection
+Fast scan speed on both products
+/- Usage of 3rd party firewall or windows 7 built in firewall
-Relatively High RAM usage of EAM upon updating, scanning and usage of IE (not tested yet Chrome).
CIS 5.10/5.12 + EAM combo:
+RAM usage lighter than ESET w/EAM combo
+More advanced HIPS w/sandbox w EAM Behavior Blocker
+EAM Web protection
+CIS and EAM Removal Capabilities
+EAM HOSTS file option protection
+Decent CAV detection and EAM high detection rates (thanks to BD signatures)
+More tweaking available in CIS (as opposed to ESET)
+CIS Firewall
+CIS HIPS easier to configure than ESET's combo
-CIS Scan speed slower than EAM
ESET with EAM combo is still a bit overkill and fits more in advanced users in terms of detection/paranoid/sense of security, while CIS with EAM fits just fine in average user(do not mistake with advanced user that will always modify settings) (provided either type of users know how to configure ESET/CIS and EAM). Both loveboy_lion and Umbra posted info/guide on how to configure the combos accordingly.
ZOU1 said:Fascinating.
Wouldn't it make more since to go to CIS? To each their own, but it seems like it would have the same benefits and seems to protect well.
I guess when you have insane RAM, it makes no difference. hehe (membership has its privileges, lol)
Depends what you are looking for.
I went ESET AV + EAM for this reason: Behavior Blocker.
Soon ditched ESET to EAM as of version 7 but then removed due to some ram usage.
EAM has spikes of RAM usage whilst ESET is stable. Adding all up is fine on a 4GB RAM system. I got 6 and is more than enough but when you mix in 2 game clients is when every little RAM counts.
In a nutshell, pros and cons:
ESET AV w/ EAM combo:
+ESET w/ Emsisoft w/ BitDefender signatures
+ESET HIPS w/ EAM Behavior Blocker (On version 6 RC is simply BB since ESET HIPS is not fully operational)
+EAM Removal Capabilities
+EAM HOSTS file option protection
+ESET w/ EAM web protection
+Fast scan speed on both products
+/- Usage of 3rd party firewall or windows 7 built in firewall
-Relatively High RAM usage of EAM upon updating, scanning and usage of IE (not tested yet Chrome).
CIS 5.10/5.12 + EAM combo:
+RAM usage lighter than ESET w/EAM combo
+More advanced HIPS w/sandbox w EAM Behavior Blocker
+EAM Web protection
+CIS and EAM Removal Capabilities
+EAM HOSTS file option protection
+Decent CAV detection and EAM high detection rates (thanks to BD signatures)
+More tweaking available in CIS (as opposed to ESET)
+CIS Firewall
+CIS HIPS easier to configure than ESET's combo
-CIS Scan speed slower than EAM
ESET with EAM combo is still a bit overkill and fits more in advanced users in terms of detection/paranoid/sense of security, while CIS with EAM fits just fine in average user(do not mistake with advanced user that will always modify settings) (provided either type of users know how to configure ESET/CIS and EAM). Both loveboy_lion and Umbra posted info/guide on how to configure the combos accordingly.
- Sep 30, 2012
- 667
RE: Rebel4Life Machine
thanks for the input guys but i have had 19 days with this combo and no problems no viruses or anything major just the firewall blocking some websites updated my DNS used that namebench and got an DNS that is 26.8% faster plus with icedragon extra defences it does go fast loading pages than waterfox with default DNS
thanks for the input guys but i have had 19 days with this combo and no problems no viruses or anything major just the firewall blocking some websites updated my DNS used that namebench and got an DNS that is 26.8% faster plus with icedragon extra defences it does go fast loading pages than waterfox with default DNS
RE: Rebel4Life Machine
I can see you have removed BD and TMHC from On-Demand scanners.
Good move.
rebel4life said:
I can see you have removed BD and TMHC from On-Demand scanners.
Good move.
RE: Rebel4Life Machine
you can also remove Trafficlight since Nod32 & Emsi IS has both a potent web protection, you will gain more browsing speed.
you can also remove Trafficlight since Nod32 & Emsi IS has both a potent web protection, you will gain more browsing speed.
- Sep 30, 2012
- 667
RE: Rebel4Life Machine
WOW 22 day with eset and EAM setup all default settings no tweaking. But just 1 trojan( Hitman Pro detected it) and no other viruses or tracking cookies a clean bil of health for my lady(PC)
WOW 22 day with eset and EAM setup all default settings no tweaking. But just 1 trojan( Hitman Pro detected it) and no other viruses or tracking cookies a clean bil of health for my lady(PC)
RE: Rebel4Life Machine
ESET+ EAM combo is one of the strongest combo to me, not surprising , i used it before moving to win8
ESET+ EAM combo is one of the strongest combo to me, not surprising , i used it before moving to win8
- Sep 30, 2012
- 667
RE: Rebel4Life Machine
ESET or EAM?
If you are asking for ESET: you will stop receiving any updates.
If you are asking for EAM: you loose the real time protection and simply becomes an On Demand Scanner (but with EAM services running on the background for no reason).
rebel4life said:
ESET or EAM?
If you are asking for ESET: you will stop receiving any updates.
If you are asking for EAM: you loose the real time protection and simply becomes an On Demand Scanner (but with EAM services running on the background for no reason).
- Sep 30, 2012
- 667
RE: Rebel4Life Machine
not eset i got a 90 day trial and using eset antivirus v6 beta i got about 68 days left so its eam 30 day trial but i got the internet security of eam what happens to the firewall keeps everything or do i lose some features
not eset i got a 90 day trial and using eset antivirus v6 beta i got about 68 days left so its eam 30 day trial but i got the internet security of eam what happens to the firewall keeps everything or do i lose some features
RE: Rebel4Life Machine
EAM becomes what I have said on previous post, while Online Armor becomes:
http://www.online-armor.com/products-online-armor-free.php
Online Armor Free.
rebel4life said:
EAM becomes what I have said on previous post, while Online Armor becomes:
http://www.online-armor.com/products-online-armor-free.php
Online Armor Free.
- Sep 30, 2012
- 667
RE: Rebel4Life Machine
hiya guys i have a problem i tried sandboxie for a few days didnt like it so i uninstall it but now ice dragon browser is still sandboxed how do i get rid of all files and program of sndboxie
hiya guys i have a problem i tried sandboxie for a few days didnt like it so i uninstall it but now ice dragon browser is still sandboxed how do i get rid of all files and program of sndboxie
- Sep 30, 2012
- 667
Similar threads
