SecureAPlus v4.2.0 - FINAL

[Av Gurus]

We are pleased to announce the official release of SecureAPlus v4.2.0 with the revamped UI.

Bugs Fixed:
- BSOD: BugCheck 3B, {c0000005, fffff8017c457b03, ffffd000218b7b30, 0}
- Scheduled chkdsk was not able to run.

Modifications:
- Reduce 7-zip CPU resource consumption.

What's new:
- New GUI
- ClamAV engine version 0.99.1

Overview

 

[Deleted member 2913]

I hate the offline ClamAV.
Many users have requested to change the offline AV but they simply dont listen & change it.

When Secure was first introduced I was a forum member & that time I too have requested to change ClamAV. They mention its start, in the future things will change but sad it never changed.

I dont remember now, think thats the reason I didn't tried to get perpetual license for beta tester. I was a beta tester.

 

[safe1st]

This version is very good
Thank you @sap
SecureAPlus Freemium

 

[Av Gurus]

They had a version with and without AV Online, so it will be with this version (later).
You can always disable Offline AV.
I do not like Clam AV (and some of 12 AV engine) also but there is an option to disable what you do not like.

 

[safe1st]

They had a version with and without AV Online, so it will be with this version (later).
You can always disable Offline AV.
I do not like Clam AV (and some of 12 AV engine) also but there is an option to disable what you do not like.

yes there's an option for that

 

[Deleted member 2913]

They had a version with and without AV Online, so it will be with this version (later).
You can always disable Offline AV.
I do not like Clam AV (and some of 12 AV engine) also but there is an option to disable what you do not like.

I know that but I have a doubt they are ever going to change the offline AV...now I dont trust them in a way.

 

[Azure]

I hate the offline ClamAV.
Many users have requested to change the offline AV but they simply dont listen & change it.

When Secure was first introduced I was a forum member & that time I too have requested to change ClamAV. They mention its start, in the future things will change but sad it never changed.

I dont remember now, think thats the reason I didn't tried to get perpetual license for beta tester. I was a beta tester.

Not that big of a deal if you consider the product is design to be compatible with whatever other antivirus you might have.

For example you could run Avira(or Avast) + SecureAplus(without ClamAV) together.

 

[Deleted member 2913]

Not that big of a deal if you consider the product is design to be compatible with whatever other antivirus you might have.

For example you could run Avira(or Avast) + SecureAplus(without ClamAV) together.

I never run 2 AVs however compatible.
And when the product is good with good features, why not change the offline AV to one of the good engines they have, it will be much better & complete product.

 

[cyht91]

I never run 2 AVs however compatible.
And when the product is good with good features, why not change the offline AV to one of the good engines they have, it will be much better & complete product.

They have always been listening to users' feedback and opinion and changing the optional offline AV is definitely in their list of improving the software. They are a very small team so do give them more time on this regarding the optional offline AV. On the other hand, it's good that they allow users to opt out of the optional offline antivirus and they always mention about using their software as an additional layer on top of your current antivirus.

 

[Deleted member 2913]

They have always been listening to users' feedback and opinion and changing the optional offline AV is definitely in their list of improving the software. They are a very small team so do give them more time on this regarding the optional offline AV. On the other hand, it's good that they allow users to opt out of the optional offline antivirus and they always mention about using their software as an additional layer on top of your current antivirus.

I know that but from the very first alpha/beta this was requested by users & they were do do something in the future. Its been a long time. From alpha the product has reached version 4. This is a long time to change the offline AV, dont you think so?

 

[frogboy]

I thought i would give SAP a run so i downloaded and am doing my first scan. Will report back later.

 

[frogboy]

Okay i have done a full scan and messed around a bit with the setting and i think it is a keeper for the time being.

 

[safe1st]

Okay i have done a full scan and messed around a bit with the setting and i think it is a keeper for the time being.

This product looks promising isnt it?

 

[frogboy]

This product looks promising isnt it?

It sure does i might have to give VoodooShield the flick and use SAP from now on, we will see.

 

[LAGUN]

it lighter than VoodooShield?

 

[safe1st]

it lighter than VoodooShield?

This product is very light (if I try to compare this with windows defender, this one is a bit more lighter).
Tested on VM with 2 GB and dual core.

 

[jamescv7]

@yesnoo: Likely (Perhaps maybe?) because the reason they have ClamWin as offline AV engine is, because besides as open source where the cloud can be enough, so their whitelisting technology also considered Plan B.

 

[blueblackwow65]

HI I am still getting the file index not ready yet and continual scanning with 4.2.0. Any fixes ? Thks
I had to turn off Universal scanning and realtime scanning to stop the full scanning and that file index error

 

[jogs]

Its good as a second opinion scanner.

 

[blueblackwow65]

Okay i have done a full scan and messed around a bit with the setting and i think it is a keeper for the time being.

Hi do You have index service running on your computer win 10?