Of course, that would be like shooting in the own foot. That is why such gadgets can be used (and are in fact) to compromise institutions, banks, Enterprises. But, as I said before, that is not a realistic way to compromise computers of the home users.
But what happens when the infection starts from system space and it's not in guarded applications, such as this one
Voodooshield and NVT EXE Radar Pro blocked this exploit in particular, I'm actually genuinely curious this time (not trolling)
I updated all my drivers with wise driver care! and it uses Duba(Kingsoft)cloud to DW them!but all of them are signed and VT show them as safe(i Checked them one by one)!can I trust it?
OM....g someone answers my question.Andy pls tell me how they clean that infected laptop
There is no proof that Voodooshield and NVT EXE Radar Pro blocked the exploit. In fact, the similar targetted attacks with the same exploits implemented in Fuzzbunch, easily bypassed Voodooshield and NVT EXE Radar Pro.But what happens when the infection starts from system space and it's not in guarded applications, such as this one
https://www.youtube .com/watch?v=lLChVsNt1fY#t=01m55s
Voodooshield and NVT EXE Radar Pro blocked this exploit in particular, I'm actually genuinely curious this time (not trolling)
What laptop, and how it was infected????OMFG someone answers my question.Andy pls tell me how they clean that infected laptop
Only for 99.99% . The 0.01% is the possibility, that they are China Government spying project.I updated all my drivers with wise driver care! and it uses Duba(Kingsoft)cloud to DW them!but all of them are signed and VT show them as safe(i Checked them one by one)!can I trust it?
Lenovo slipped 'Superfish' malware into laptops
OMFG someone answers my question.Andy pls tell me how they clean that infected laptop
Yes. That was Umbra and my conclusion, and there are some facts that can support this. But there is a small probability, that an early Metasploit implementation of DoublePulsar was simply buggy.
It would be not wise to use both AppGuard and VoodooShield alongside with Kaspersky. If you cannot sleep fearing that you are still unprotected with Kaspersky alone, then use Appguard if you like SRP or VoodooShield if you like anti-exe. My advice is to meditate for a week (for the better sleep), and finally, stick with Kaspersky alone.If you don't let the malware start, it can't infect you, right? Perhaps more vulnerable processes should be blacklisted to make sure nothing starts without your consent? I'm thinking of using appguard along with VS and adding everything from here - https://excubits.com/content/files/blacklist.txt to the guarded applications list, and using install mode when I need to run one of them, what do you think? Obviously as a home user with decent habits I'm pretty much never gonna have to worry about such exploits and things, like you said, but I want the 99.99999% protection
It would be not wise to use both AppGuard and VoodooShield alongside with Kaspersky. If you cannot sleep fearing that you are still unprotected with Kaspersky alone, then use Appguard if you like SRP or VoodooShield if you like anti-exe. My advice is to meditate for a week (for the better sleep), and finally, stick with Kaspersky alone.
If you want 99.99% protection, then use a Chromebook instead Windows (@Lockdown good advice).
You can easily access 99.99999% protection when throwing all computer components and monitor into the blast furnace.
I can't play league of legends with chrome book lol useless os -_-
Chrome OS is based on Linux. Google haven't made their "own" OS, they just modify the Linux kernel to adapt for their needs. This also means that Android is based on Linux. Of course it isn't identical to the Linux kernel they decide to use, since they will heavily modify it so it is capable of supporting what they need (and remove things they don't happen to want), but they base it on Linux. Windows started using DOS (which they bought from IBM) and then adapted it into MS-DOS, and then they proceeded with the release of Windows NT and continued to develop it since then up to now. Even a majority of hobbyist OS-developers don't make it entirely themselves - they'll usually have assistance from very old articles about OS development, some of which were published around the years 1998-2005 (e.g. OS Wiki, OS Dever, etc.).
