Serious Discussion Some guy asks if Windows Defender/Microsoft Defender is enough and this is the amazing answer he got back

Status
Not open for further replies.
a redirected link is well inserted backend side so is not Parkinsond fault :


this server can only be secure with a TLS 1.2 protocol :


don't pay something on this server if you have not a TLS 1.2 protocol activated :


The server has TLS 1.0 enabled. It is non-compliant with NIST since SP 800-52 REV. 2 and non-compliant with PCI DSS since the 30th of June 2018.

The server has TLS 1.1 enabled. It is non-compliant with PCI DSS since the 31st of March 2025.

i recommend you to use this addon if you are on firefox : Server Status – Get this Extension for 🦊 Firefox (en-US)

oh yeah there is no HSTS : Strict-Transport-Security header - HTTP | MDN
 
Look inside your refrigerator. There are things in there that are far, far more evil and harmful than Microsoft will ever be.
True—my fridge might clog arteries, but it never tried to upsell me OneDrive storage.
In my fridge, everything comes with a "Safe to Use Before" date guarantee - no harm or clogged arteries, just free offers and peace of mind! 😊
 
"Open source is waaayyyy more secure than proprietary (closed source) software."

Yeah. Sure thing.

The Linux ecosystem is a s h e e t s h o w.

1748384137317.png
 
"Open source is waaayyyy more secure than proprietary (closed source) software."

Yeah. Sure thing.

The Linux ecosystem is a s h e e t s h o w.

View attachment 288821
Yes Linux has issues, but Debian does a good job with vulnerabilities. It's basically the boss/feeder to the majority of Linux ecosystem. When it moves others follow.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Recently browsing

Members who viewed this thread in the last 5 minutes

Back
Top