- Jul 28, 2016
- 950
For me, it´s a good config. Please, how does Qihoo currently behave? - I'm talking about security and performance - and another question, isn't MBAE redundant with OSA?
I used to love Qihoo, but it seems that its protection capacity has gone to less and its privacy policy is not the most convenient.
Thank you for sharing your config and thank you for answering my questions.
hello black wings sure , I will answer you're questions.....no problem at all brother
qihoo used to be a resource hog a couple of releases back , so i submitted some feedback to them and the fixed most of the memory / cpu leaks , if not all of them in my case. regarding the privacy concerns : it may be up to eahc and every differnt end user ; I myself have no reason to fear them : I have nothing to hide...sure there will be times the protection capacities of various security product may fluctuate from time to time , that is why I make use of a layered security concept : if one layer fails me , another layer will save me. OSA has software level exploit protection and MBAE has software and os level exploit protections , so the two can work in peace and harmony together. hope this answers you're questions??