Then something is not working -- my side -- because the ad is gone -- the place holder remains.
Edit
Okay...my bad -- place holder needed more rules
Last edited:
Hot Take uBlock Stripped - Dynamic Filtering is available on the webstore
-
Thread starter
LinuxFan58
- Start date
- 408 Replies
- 38,117 Views
Thread details
Edit
Okay...my bad -- place holder needed more rules
No you were right, now you probably also have hidden the menu? What browser are you using?
Last edited:
Will be in next release (and a reset @Jan Willy )
Your extension is eminently suited for use with UG Chromium.
You are now "trusted" or at least getting close to that designation.This is crazy, UBS published within 15 minutes after uploading (the time it took to write above post)
Okay, noted but you can disable it. I added all last usability/ease of use features (saving restoring all settings) and won´t be adding protections either so from now on it will be bug solving I guess. Cookies are the oldest form of user tracking (with infinite application date), also stale (cached) data can (rarely) cause websites to act funny. Why do you don't like them removed?
Last edited:
Tip: because you UnGoogled Chromium adding Osprey Browser Protection and Download Sentinel will compensate for the missing Google Safe browsing service.Your extension is eminently suited for use with UG Chromium.
Version 9.4.5
Two remarks.
1. The description of Privacy & Security isn't consistent.
2. I should delete all three options and refer in the explanation at the top of 'Automatically enable ....' to Privacy & Security tab. F.i.: 'On the Privacy & Security tab extra protections are enabled at default. They can be disabled. Also you can enable some more protections.'
So you can also simplify the Privacy & Security tab.
Two remarks.
1. The description of Privacy & Security isn't consistent.
2. I should delete all three options and refer in the explanation at the top of 'Automatically enable ....' to Privacy & Security tab. F.i.: 'On the Privacy & Security tab extra protections are enabled at default. They can be disabled. Also you can enable some more protections.'
So you can also simplify the Privacy & Security tab.
Last edited:
Yes that is true, but offering these choices in two layers should be easier to understand
This way is called gated conditional. In the Worry free they are gated (do you want to enable this group when this context/situation applies) and on the Privacy & Security panel you can enable or disable them. This two step approach should make it easier to oversee the consequences.
But that is all theory, when people disagree (users of uBol-Stripped are problably smarter than users of other adblockers
), I will use the flat sequence you proposed.Will check on consistancy (Privacy & Security) thanks for reporting.
Haha, not for me. Perhaps because I'm not left handed.
Worry free in my eyes does mean don't show at first sight many options, I have to investigate. Real worry free also means browsing with as least as possible customizable extra's. I don't want to worry which options I should disable or enable.Edited: IMO worry free browsing should offer at default optimally settings with minimal risk of breaking sites. The more possibilities to customize, the more this optimum waters down. Especially when users uncheck many options.
3P-M is an example how it should be.
Last edited:
Pushed 9.4.6 to CWS with only text changes (consequently call it Privacy & Security in stead of Security & Privacy) - thx @Jan Willy
@JW the default has changed it is a safe default (only Worry-Free at startup is disabled when I recal right, all others enabled)
@JW the default has changed it is a safe default (only Worry-Free at startup is disabled when I recal right, all others enabled)
Last edited:
But why adding 'tab', 'panel' and nothing?
Reset, Restore and Save work well, thanks.
OK next update I will iron that out also, as a dyslectic language is not my strong point 
Because I had that problem with the Weerplaza site, I just thought... why not try Buienradar? But I just found out that cookie consent cannot help with this...
No matter what I choose with cookie consent, if I return to Buienradar later, I get the same screen again.
No matter what I choose with cookie consent, if I return to Buienradar later, I get the same screen again.
This wasn't exactly what I meant. As I explained before, in worry free mode shouldn't nearly all settings be optional.
Edited: A mode where all settings are optional, I would call Advanced mode.
Last edited:
Thank you, I will give that a try.
EDIT: That did indeed do the trick, thank you very much.
Last edited:
@Morro,
With these rules buienradar.nl seems fully functional
@Morro @oldschool @Jan Willy
uMatrix had recipes in the past. A place where users could share rules (blocking 3P with allow rules). When I make the export function also search box aware, it would be easy to share recipes for websites (like JW did to strip buienradar.nl for Morro)
I could open a new Github Repo and allow users with a Github account to post recipes. I could add folders per generic TLD and country code.
What do you think of that community driven model, we could try it out on Malware Tips first (creating a thread called UBS Custom Rules Recipes.
With these rules buienradar.nl seems fully functional
@Morro @oldschool @Jan Willy
uMatrix had recipes in the past. A place where users could share rules (blocking 3P with allow rules). When I make the export function also search box aware, it would be easy to share recipes for websites (like JW did to strip buienradar.nl for Morro)
I could open a new Github Repo and allow users with a Github account to post recipes. I could add folders per generic TLD and country code.
What do you think of that community driven model, we could try it out on Malware Tips first (creating a thread called UBS Custom Rules Recipes.
Collecting custom rules for specific sites? I can't imagine it would be a great success.
Edited: perhaps in Poland and Sweden.
Last edited:
Recently browsing
Members who viewed this thread in the last 5 minutes