- Mar 29, 2018
- 7,612
This does not exclude, that "Ultimate chair" exists not conventionally but also objectively, as a kind of interaction between parts of reality: human part and physical (chair atoms) part. Of course, there will be no "Ultimate chair" in this case, without humans (who know the meaning of the chair).
There are probably several consistent meanings of reality.
The way I use "conventionally" is like your objectively. Normally a chair is used for sitting, but its meaning (function) can change as needed. It can also be a step ladder, or a weapon in a fight. Anyone observing these uses would agree that they are still chairs. A different example is a man who sees a length of black tubing on a floor and becomes afraid, thinking it is a poisonous snake. This is a mistaken appearance as perceived by this man. Or a man walking at dusk who sees a dark figure, thinking it is a wild and dangerous animal.
Or the man who dreams of a beautiful woman and who becomes enamored of her. He then wakes up with this strong feeling/experience of the woman which is quite real , followed immediately by the recognition it was only a dream and is dismayed and saddened. We could say most or all of our daily experiences are like this, except in most of our daily experience there is some measure of predictability.
Of course, it does not mean that people cannot find out something better in the future.
Absolutely.
Dear Guillermo Schwarz, please do not talk/write about things that you do not understand at all.