I nicely take issue the statement: 'Mcafee, Eset are light, however have their issues. Lighter doesn't means adequate protection and vice versa.'PAnda- Garbage.
Comodo- Runner up after Panda.
Mcafee, Eset are light, however have their issues. Lighter doesn't means adequate protection and vice versa.
F secure is alright..install and share your opinion
Norton is light and powerful, however too many many Fp's.Trashes almost every new file as (Heur.Adv.ml.b) depending on Community score and file insight
I'm not sure what issues both those AV's have, in AV Comparatives for example its a few parts of a single percentage, on other tests ESET has done really well. Most users will never come across the 1000 or so evils presented on the desktop) to an AV solution (as if beamed there Star Trek style) - In absolute terms if a user needs lightness then 'maybe' some protection may have to be compromised, though as far as I'm concerned these compromises are in the ether not on users PC's - The OP did ask for lightness though?
As a side note, I have never has issues with FP's using Norton either which is on this PC (in normal use) The addition of a couple of browser additions can increase security anyway at little slowdown with any solution.