Advice Request Which Extension is best for security ?

[EascapenMatrix]

I tried BD trafficlight, emisoft and malwarebytes browser guard. I liked BD, emisoft but malwarebytes was slowing my browsing too much. After few trials and errors, I ended up with BD, and I was quite satisfied with that forgetting about the privacy issues that come with it.

But recently I found many places on some corners of the web and even here, that it now lost its charm. I tested only against phishing against phishtank links. And this time BD missed a lot. Followed by Emisoft and Malwarebytes which was best in this regard.

Now, I want to know your opinion. Which is the best extension against malware and phishing protection? I am ready to know about other extensions which are as good or better than these three.

 

[anirbandutta01]

Now, I want to know your opinion. Which is the best extension against malware and phishing protection?

Malwarebytes Browser Guard.

 

[Shadowra]

They are all equal.
Whether it's Malwarebytes, Avira or TrafficLight, they are very effective

My favorite will remain TrafficLight and Avira

 

[EascapenMatrix]

They are all equal.
Whether it's Malwarebytes, Avira or TrafficLight, they are very effective

My favorite will remain TrafficLight and Avira

Isn't Trafficlight effectiveness is reduced? Is it still the best? Also, which one will better in terms of blocking malware and phishing?

 

[silversurfer]

I tried BD trafficlight, emisoft and malwarebytes browser guard. I liked BD, emisoft but malwarebytes was slowing my browsing too much. After few trials and errors, I ended up with BD, and I was quite satisfied with that forgetting about the privacy issues that come with it.

But recently I found many places on some corners of the web and even here, that it now lost its charm. I tested only against phishing against phishtank links. And this time BD missed a lot. Followed by Emisoft and Malwarebytes which was best in this regard.

Now, I want to know your opinion. Which is the best extension against malware and phishing protection? I am ready to know about other extensions which are as good or better than these three.

My personal ranking based on protection effectiveness and browsing speed impact:

1st. Bitdefender Trafficlight
2nd. Avira Browser Safety
3rd place for both below:

• Malwarebytes Browser Guard (highest impact on browsing speed).
• Emsisoft Browser Security (lowest impact on browsing speed).

 

[oldschool]

I want to know your opinion.

I use Emsisoft. Pretty good protection, fast browsing.

 

[Shadowra]

Isn't Trafficlight effectiveness is reduced? Is it still the best? Also, which one will better in terms of blocking malware and phishing?

I would say that Avira is ahead of Bitdefender on phishing, but they are quite similar

 

[SeriousHoax]

All the ones mentioned by you and other users are very good. In my testing, Norton Safe Web performs the best at blocking both malware and phishing sites. It's often one of the first to block. I also like McAfee Safe Web. Both of them don't have any browsing speed impact similar to Emsisoft, but Norton consumes a lot of ram. 100 MB on my PC.

 

[cruelsister]

CRAEN (Cruelsister's Remove All Extensions Now). Still in development as I haven't decided on which spy module to weave within it.

 

[Digmor Crusher]

CRAEN (Cruelsister's Remove All Extensions Now). Still in development as I haven't decided on which spy module to weave within it.

In Chrome I use, UBO, Bitwarden and Microsoft Defender Browser Protection, I suppose the Microsoft one could be the double agent.

 

[upnorth]

The most extensive thread on that topic here on MT, and long time tested by @Evjl's Rain and a few others is what I would recommend check out, even if his last posted test is from last year.

Question - [Updated 29/12/2018] Browser extension comparison: Malwares and Phishings

Comparison between browser extensions Test 29/12 Q&A - [Updated 29/12/2018] Browser extension comparison: Malwares and Phishings Test 24/11 Q&A - [Updated 24/11/2018] Browser extension comparison: Malwares and Phishings Test 12/11 Q&A - [Updated 12/11/2018] Browser extension comparison...

malwaretips.com

 

[eXDj]

Microsoft Edge CAN 110.0.1533.0

1.Microsoft Edge Addons
2.Microsoft Edge Addons
3.TrafficLight

 

[ErzCrz]

CRAEN (Cruelsister's Remove All Extensions Now). Still in development as I haven't decided on which spy module to weave within it.

Minimal is the best way to go so just uBO in tweaked Hard-Mode working fine. I'd go down the DNS route but it'd have to be DOH as my ISP Sky ignores PC config through it's router. Was a big fan of NoScript until I discovered uBO's capability

 

[Back3]

The extension that comes with my antivirus and a secure DNS.

 

[piquiteco]

@EascapenMatrix For phishing sites in particular the Netcraft extension is the best. I assume you have good web browsing habits. If you do, don't worry too much about phishing sites, they don't last more than 24 hours. The other extensions, mentioned here on MT, by members are excellent if not the best.

 

[ForgottenSeer 97327]

I am using Edge with Smartscreen and NextDNS with Google Safe Browsing and Trend Micro's URL filter of TP-Link home care on my router. No extensions for URL filtering

 

[eXDj]

update,now i have

1. Malwarebytes Browser Guard
2. Netcraft Extension
3. Norton Safe Web
4. Windscribe - Free Proxy and Ad Blocker
5. uBlock Origin
6. Emsisoft Browser Security
7. Microsoft Defender Browser Protection
8. TrafficLight

 

[HarborFront]

Netcraft extension protects more than just phishing

Phishing sites
Fake shops
Coronavirus-related cybercrime
JavaScript skimmers
Cyptocurrency miners
Other malicious scripts
Cross-site scripting (XSS)

 

[Thales]

I trust in NextDNS. No extension.

 

[ForgottenSeer 97327]

In the past I used Netcraft extension, because long ago on WS it was the only one extension besides NoScript which intercepted a cross site scripting attack (XSS). Netcraft is not that well known in the consumer market, but in the corporate security market they have an impressive track record . This page describes what Netcraft company does in relation to cybercrime prevention, detection and retaliation https://www.netcraft.com/cybercrime/

Netcraft seems to have some repeat business model in relation to webservers, which allows them to conduct surveys on over 1.1 billion websites each month. So the data collection to detect frauduleus websites probably has the same impressive outreach (URL filtering is a numbers game, only companies with a lot of data point points sensors like leading AV's, webbrowsers, DNS services and server/router based security hardware/software can collect this info).

Reason I stopped using Netcraft is that they tell on their website that their info is used by al major webbrowsers

Spoiler: Netcraft services licensed to

So question to @HarborFront and others using Netcraft: have you seen it popup latelly?


By the way @Jack nice idea (100 points)

I am using Edge with Smartscreen and NextDNS with Google Safe Browsing and Trend Micro's URL filter of TP-Link home care on my router. No extensions for URL filtering

I removed Trend Micros URL filtering in the router because it did not intercept HTTPS URL requests and replaced it with TrafficLight extension of bitdefender.