I use ProtonVPN on my Asus Router with VPN Director. I like it this way so I can configure which devices run on VPN 1,2,3,4,5 and which devices can use direct internet.
- Dec 4, 2014
- 3,494
- 1
- 19,053
- 4,479
- 52
I meant that nord does not own the servers used. Mullvad actually owns some of their server and doesn't rent them. In that way Mullvad has greater control.
I used Mullvad for years but I had continual issues with various UK servers rented or not, in the end after trying it several times over months I gave up with them, I know others have no problems, at the moment I use ExpressVPN, disliked by many but very fast, simple to use & faultless for months.
- Dec 4, 2014
- 3,494
- 1
- 19,053
- 4,479
- 52
I'm not currently using it. But I have used it not long ago and I found it to work very well, even though there are more privacy conscious alternatives.
I've tried several popular VPNs and used ExpressVPN for three years; in my experience, it's the best overall, although it is expensive. Later, I purchased lifetime subscriptions for Windscribe and HideAway; both work well, and I'm satisfied with my choices. I also have a lifetime subscription to PureVPN, but I dislike its bloated interface and overall feel.
just giving Mullvad (again after a hiatus) a try for a month or two, seems OK so far...
Currently on ProtonVPN, so far of the ones I've tried it gives the least amount of captcha's on Google. Tempted to try ExpressVPN as there's an offer on atm ~£40 for 2 years which is very cheap for them.
I started using Mullvad (again) on fedora and it has been rock solid for me, plenty fast and solid connection.
even has quantum resistance (whatever that is )
Yes: I'm also running a 'quantum resistance' tunnel, I have a friend who say he is a 'life transparency engineer' (he also washes windows) 
Last edited:
Been enjoying Proton, but their web extension is quite bad. The software itself works really well, but when using the extension it's sometimes hit or miss where it'll take forever to load some websites. Also has the same issue I had with surfshark where one server (using the UK servers as an example) will give 800-900+ and then another will give significantly lower at like 200-400, so I wish it was a bit more consistent. Anyone got recommendations for a more consistent speed of 1000+ or is this just common due to the server load etc?
@Lad With a Dad - I really don't know which VPN will serve you best, & it depends where you are to get the best out of UK servers, if you are distant your ping & speed will be lower - I'm in the UK so 99% of the time I connect to a UK server & that helps with local sites, however I get much he same speed out of most European servers as they are close - There will always be a differing load on servers & especially at peak times - The fastest mainstream VPN I've used is ExpressVPN, this is owned by Kape who have had interesting origins though, but in my case totally reliable.
I never had issues with Express but its not the most privacy orientated, maybe??? - I really don't use web extensions on a VPN that I can remember as its easy to access on Windows from my taskbar, I'm using Mullvad at the moment & lose maybe 10-15% speed from a direct connection, the thing I like with Mullvad is you can just pay for one month or as many as you wish & top up as you choose, the speed is pretty good ? The fastest I've ever used is Kaspersky run by I believe Hotspot Shield, but you can't use it in USA + its not that private!
I never had issues with Express but its not the most privacy orientated, maybe??? - I really don't use web extensions on a VPN that I can remember as its easy to access on Windows from my taskbar, I'm using Mullvad at the moment & lose maybe 10-15% speed from a direct connection, the thing I like with Mullvad is you can just pay for one month or as many as you wish & top up as you choose, the speed is pretty good ? The fastest I've ever used is Kaspersky run by I believe Hotspot Shield, but you can't use it in USA + its not that private!
Last edited:
RoboMan
Level 38
Verified
Honorary Member
Top Poster
Content Creator
Well-known
High Reputation
Forum Veteran
When living in Europe, I was a big fan of AirVPN (an OpenVPN and WireGuard based VPN operated by activists in defense of net neutrality, privacy and against censorship).
When back in South America I bought a 2 year deal of NordVPN and was beyond satisfied. When it was time to renew and the price went up, I switched to Windscribe for a lower price and solid security and interesting features. Since then I've been a user of the last. Of course, no logs policy.
When back in South America I bought a 2 year deal of NordVPN and was beyond satisfied. When it was time to renew and the price went up, I switched to Windscribe for a lower price and solid security and interesting features. Since then I've been a user of the last. Of course, no logs policy.
Also, using mainstream VPNs for streaming. I think ExpressVPN still offers better applications than NordVPN and Surfshark. I use NordVPN and Surfshark with an access token on my ASUS router via WireGuard/NordLynx, and it works well; ping is low 1-5ms and bandwidth is reduced to 850-950Mbps from 1Gbps.
Last edited:
Probably server load if you ask me, depending where you are in the world it will effect your speed. But I get full speed on Mullvad/IVPN/AirVPN almost anywhere in the world, 5G usually 350+MB anywhere too depending on how isolated the area is.
I'm also in the UK. My download speed is 1600 so it's just frustrating seeing it get all the way down to 200-400 when it does happen, but I know with a VPN I won't always get those speeds
Is that measured on Ethernet or wireless though???
From my Speedtest laptop app. My default ISP speed.
Connecting with the lowly and often chastised F-Secure (LOL)....and their VPN, connecting to the nearest location to me, Chicago.
That is to much of a loss, unless the, your VPN can't keep up with those speeds? (if something like that could be an issue?)
When I used the Proton paid version and connected to the sever nearest to me, were always close to my ISP speeds, as well as Mullvad.
When I had 300Mbps service, I never saw a big difference between the speeds, either.
Did you try a different server location, or using a different VPN protocol?
The speeds are very close, it may due to service fluctuation. But the ping has tripled when connected to this VPN. 36 ping is ok for a mobile provider (though it could be way better on 5G standalone).
But for landline internet, it’s a bit too much.
On paper, I agree, but it's never been a problem, that slight lag with any of my web connections, unnoticeable
You may also like...
-
Those of you who are true IT sec prof here and not doing this for just a hobby be careful.- Started by cartaphilus
- Replies: 40
-
Why Are So Many Users Switching from Windows to Linux?- Started by TuxTalk
- Replies: 48
-
-
Evaluation of Cloudflare Zero Trust Free plan after using it for 3,5 months- Started by LinuxFan58
- Replies: 7
-
Is Paid VPN Still Worth It in 2025 – Or Are We Wasting Money?- Started by Bot
- Replies: 17