Question Who is willing to test a new uBlock Stripped with dynamic filtering?

[LinuxFan58]

Thanks a lot for the modification. I like clarity and ease of use (I'm an easy-going person). It's not my goal to allow as much as possible, but the opposite. The allow list inspires me to (experimentally) block items. I want to keep the allow list as short as possible.

Okay, so you would like the default on block mode? V7.4.2 on Github

 

[Jan Willy]

Okay, so you would like the default on block mode? V7.4.2 on Github

View attachment 299201

You may keep it on default blocked. I think most users are in the first place interested in that. It's a small effort to switch to allowed, even for me.

 

[LinuxFan58]

You may keep it on default blocked. I think most users are in the first place interested in that. It''s a small effort to switch to allowed, even for me.

Well my Kees1958 only uses the trackers with 1% prevelence, but the DuckDuckGO data base I am using I used a 0.01% cut off point. Because the Dynamic DNR is always domain specific there is only limited breakage risk (only the website you are browsing). So when using a small tracker blocklist (e.g. my Kees1958 with only tracking networks who have at least a 1% market share in the top 1 million visited websites), the intended usage is ti manually add trackers on website you visit often (but don´t log in to buy or book stuff).

That is why I made the comparison with taking along all travel maps of the world when you are just going for a city trip in your own country. Replace citytrip with websites and your own country with your bookmarked websites. Using this lean approach allows to add extra functionality (using AG lists and scriptlets) without sacrificing performance (and of course extra's as Privacy Inspector, Dynamic DNR filtering and pre fabricated security and privacy rules).

Thanks for all the suggestions.

 

[LinuxFan58]

Found another small glitch: github V7.4.7 and added a search field custom rules manager