Deprecated WiseVector Free AI Driven Security

[Chri.Mi]

Hello @WiseVector
Again thanks for your very fast nd good help to solve my false positive Q&A - ORGCHART.EXE.bak
I would suggest that when uploading a suspicious/or probably false positive file you add the possibility to post a comment for explaining the reason of this submission.

@WiseVector
I appreciated much the reactivity with who u whitelisting false positives (low then 10 minutes ). I would suggest another mechanism. U are not using signatures if i understand how product work, so u can encounter some fps and some threats. Why dont give the opportunity to send u all threats with 1 click (Upload to WiseVector for analysis), so u can analyze all them and put all files in quarantene temporarily. After u have Verdict u can whitelist them automatically (if FPS) or Quarantine/Delete(with some message like File analyzed:Threats found!). This will help make u product almost perfect in my opinion.

 

[JB007]

@WiseVector
I would also suggest that you create a special thread on MT only for reporting FP and dangerous files not detected

 

[Decopi]

@WiseVector thanks for your answer.

For the last 12 months I've been testing Cylance (HE) and AhnLab etc. And now my intention is to start testing WV (since February I was waiting for the announced v2.6). I presume v2.6 finally makes WV enough mature and ready to be compared to its peers.

Cylance (HE) and AhnLab, both have their pros and cons, but both are very lightweight.
However, WV is even more lightweight (-50% system resources than Cylance and AhnLab). Quiet impressive. Congrats.

After uninstalling and reinstalling WV days ago, I haven't seen again the issue related to high CPU/RAM use.
So now I believe I can focus on protection tests. For several months I followed here some tests and testers. It's time to make my own tests... let's see what WV can do (compared to Cylance and AhnLab).

 

[WiseVector]

Hi@JB007@Chri.Mi

Thanks a lot for your suggestion. It will help us to work more effeciently. We would like to improve our working way graduatly.
Yes, I will create a thread on MT only for reporting FP and suspicious files not detected soon.

Best Regards,
WiseVector

 

[WiseVector]

@WiseVector thanks for your answer.

For the last 12 months I've been testing Cylance (HE) and AhnLab etc. And now my intention is to start testing WV (since February I was waiting for the announced v2.6). I presume v2.6 finally makes WV enough mature and ready to be compared to its peers.

Cylance (HE) and AhnLab, both have their pros and cons, but both are very lightweight.
However, WV is even more lightweight (-50% system resources than Cylance and AhnLab). Quiet impressive. Congrats.

After uninstalling and reinstalling WV days ago, I haven't seen again the issue related to high CPU/RAM use.
So now I believe I can focus on protection tests. For several months I followed here some tests and testers. It's time to make my own tests... let's see what WV can do (compared to Cylance and AhnLab).

Hi,

Thanks for reinstalling WiseVector StopX and making tests.
Looking forward to your feedback.

Best Wishes,
WiseVector

 

[Mops21]

Hi @WiseVector

Friday at 5:53 PM

#882

@Mops21, Sorry for the inconvience! We just removed the installer of V2.60 and released V2.61. Since we have found a problem: Due to a configuration file error in the V2.60 installer, V2.60 can only update virus definity signatures, but cannot update to V2.61 automatically.
There are two ways can update to V2.61:

I have downloaded this Version and check this please that is not updated WiseVector Eigenschaftsinfos Bug 01 are the Infos not updated see the Fileversion and Productversion it says 2.6.0.0 is that so right

And is this the English Version too

Saturday at 2:05 AM

#890

Mikesierra said:

Looks like this is the Chinese version. Is there also an English version available?

And you have posted the English Version download Link that says the same infos

Witzh best Regards
Mops21

 

[Chri.Mi]

@WiseVector or others,
Would ask if u have idea how much is difference in protection and false positives using all 4 different heuristics in percentage. For example is rly much the difference from low to aggressive?

 

[WiseVector]

Hi @WiseVector

Friday at 5:53 PM

#882

@Mops21, Sorry for the inconvience! We just removed the installer of V2.60 and released V2.61. Since we have found a problem: Due to a configuration file error in the V2.60 installer, V2.60 can only update virus definity signatures, but cannot update to V2.61 automatically.
There are two ways can update to V2.61:

I have downloaded this Version and check this please that is not updated WiseVector Eigenschaftsinfos Bug 01 are the Infos not updated see the Fileversion and Productversion it says 2.6.0.0 is that so right

And is this the English Version too

Saturday at 2:05 AM

#890

Mikesierra said:

Looks like this is the Chinese version. Is there also an English version available?

And you have posted the English Version download Link that says the same infos

Witzh best Regards
Mops21

Oh, we should be a little bit more careful when we do our job.
Thanks for your feedback. We would like to update the details in our next release.

 

[WiseVector]

@WiseVector or others,
Would ask if u have idea how much is difference in protection and false positives using all 4 different heuristics in percentage. For example is rly much the difference from low to aggressive?

Generally speaking, the higher level of protection means higher detection rate but more FPs.
It's suggested that users can use WiseVector StopX with the default settings,since if there is a malware missed by static scanning, our multi-layers protection will stop it as well.

 

[Mops21]

Oh, we should be a little bit more careful when we do our job.
Thanks for your feedback. We would like to update the details in our next release.

Hi @WiseVector

Thank you very much for your Infos

When you open the Thread for False Positives here you can use it for all Wisevector detected Files

And can you post the Link to that Thread here please

With best Regards
Mops21

 

[Chri.Mi]

@WiseVector
Can u test the compatibility between WV and malwarebytes anti malware . I am experiencing 100% BSOD. Specially when convert from trial to free

 

[WiseVector]

Hi @WiseVector

Thank you very much for your Infos

When you open the Thread for False Positives here you can use it for all Wisevector detected Files

And can you post the Link to that Thread here please

With best Regards
Mops21

Yes, I will. I have sent a PM to Jack to ask if it's OK, but no reply still now.

 

[WiseVector]

@WiseVector
Can u test the compatibility between WV and malwarebytes anti malware . I am experiencing 100% BSOD.

WiseVector StopX is compatible with Malwarebytes in our test.

Can you please be aware of which driver caused BSOD when it appears again?
Thank you!

 

[Chri.Mi]

I have removed MBAM... U can try if this happen when u convert in free... anyway if nothing happen was my fault then.

 

[Petrovic]

2.62 beta released

 

[Vitali Ortzi]

@WiseVector thanks for your answer.

For the last 12 months I've been testing Cylance (HE) and AhnLab etc. And now my intention is to start testing WV (since February I was waiting for the announced v2.6). I presume v2.6 finally makes WV enough mature and ready to be compared to its peers.

Cylance (HE) and AhnLab, both have their pros and cons, but both are very lightweight.
However, WV is even more lightweight (-50% system resources than Cylance and AhnLab). Quiet impressive. Congrats.

After uninstalling and reinstalling WV days ago, I haven't seen again the issue related to high CPU/RAM use.
So now I believe I can focus on protection tests. For several months I followed here some tests and testers. It's time to make my own tests... let's see what WV can do (compared to Cylance and AhnLab).

Can't wait for an update about the test results !

 

[WiseVector]

Hello Guys,

Here is the update log of WiseVector StopX V2.62 Beta:
1. Fixed the problem that may cause increased memory usage under certain specific conditions.
2. Fixed the problem that after minimizing the window, it may not be restored from the taskbar.
3. Prevented flickering window once at startup.
4. Increase the detection rate of malware in Office format.
5. Fixed the problem that memory detection may cause a bit high CPU usage under certain specific conditions.
6. Some other adjustments on the UI.

Any question, please don't hesitate to contact us!

Best Wishes,
WiseVector

 

[Vitali Ortzi]

Hello Guys,

Here is the update log of WiseVector StopX V2.62 Beta:
1. Fixed the problem that may cause increased memory usage under certain specific conditions.
2. Fixed the problem that after minimizing the window, it may not be restored from the taskbar.
3. Prevented flickering window once at startup.
4. Increase the detection rate of malware in Office format.
5. Fixed the problem that memory detection may cause a bit high CPU usage under certain specific conditions.
6. Some other adjustments on the UI.

Any question, please don't hesitate to contact us!

Best Wishes,
WiseVector

Sounds like it might fixed all the small minor issues I had thanks
Will test soon.

 

[eonline]

WiseVector does not yet integrate with the Windows security center. I hope they can, in future versions, integrate it into the windows security center. Thank you very much in advance.

 

[SeriousHoax]

Hello Guys,

Here is the update log of WiseVector StopX V2.62 Beta:
1. Fixed the problem that may cause increased memory usage under certain specific conditions.
2. Fixed the problem that after minimizing the window, it may not be restored from the taskbar.
3. Prevented flickering window once at startup.
4. Increase the detection rate of malware in Office format.
5. Fixed the problem that memory detection may cause a bit high CPU usage under certain specific conditions.
6. Some other adjustments on the UI.

Any question, please don't hesitate to contact us!

Best Wishes,
WiseVector

Can you provide the download link?