Why not use Malwarebytes ? It takes only 20 min
Cpu 8x3.79Ghz-about 50% usage on scan...and HDD show me in task manager 250-300MB/s(But i think it wrong,because i can see active whit ofter tools,and show me 80MB/s)..I think it normal speedYour CPU must be very slow or your reading speed from HDD must be slow too.
It depends on how many files are on the HDD, but in general it doesn't take long at all.
There are instances where large file size especially in .ISO where contains a lot of files which makes the scanning process took very long.
Some you may check the configuration as possible + those are estimated time completion due to resource operation that can vary.
Will be check today,i think yes..True! That's why i set my scan this way
Is there an option for Kaspersky to exclude compressed files from Full Scan?
I'm seeing the same slow scanning with Kaspersky. I do think using "do not unpack compound files larger than" option will help me as it seems to hang up on some of them.
Does anyone have a suggestion for what the ideal file size is for this setting? I realize that most malware/viruses are usually fairly small and the larger files on my PC are all pretty old and aren't an issue.
Do not scan archives... it is absolutely a complete waste of system resources. Kaspersky will detect any malicious files upon extraction.
It seems to me that something else is amiss. The longest scan I've ever had was 4.5 hours with maximum heuristics on a crapware-laden OEM system.