Advice Request A friend told me he never installs a Chrome addon on his Edge broswer. Is that O.C.D, or its better approach and why?

Share practical recommendations that address the author's needs.

amirr

Level 27
Verified
Top Poster
Well-known
I hope he does not read there, but here is what he wrote me:
"As I use very few extensions, using the one I do use allows me to not activate the Chrome web store, and only use Edge extensions. But that’s my use case.
If you already use Chrome extensions on Edge, you may as well use a more frequently updated one if you wish to do so."
 
If an extension is turned off, can it still somehow be active in the background? I suppose if it is malicious, it can?

Otherwise, uninstalling them would probably be the safest thing to do. As this thread reminded me of doing that in Edge, reviewing my extensions, addons. I did uninstall a few in Chrome over the weekend.
 
If an extension is turned off, can it still somehow be active in the background?
It can probably still get updated, especially since it is a separate store, and there have been cases when hackers hijacked legitimate extensions and pushed an malicious update.
 
It can probably still get updated, especially since it is a separate store, and there have been cases when hackers hijacked legitimate extensions and pushed an malicious update.
Excellent reply and links. Thank you.
 
I feel the same as @TairikuOkami. I don't really see the point of using Edge over Chrome if you're just going to establish a permanent network connection to Google anyway.
Compatibility and support is the answer. Microsoft will provide support for Edge but not Chrome. Enterprises will use Edge because of this. Though things have improved with Chrome being able to be controlled it by Group Policy somewhat, I think people and enterprises will still use M$ over Chrome because of support.

On the topic of extensions, less is more. uBlock Origin is all you need. And it's safe. Until MV3 is introduced then there is no reason to change browser to FireFox or one of its forks. With Firefox you can add CanvasBloicker and uMatrix and maybe CookieAutoDelete without any trouble, they are trusted extensions.
 
Last edited:
This is another answer:
hxxps://www.reddit.com/r/edge/comments/11fccd8/should_i_get_extensions_from_the_microsoft_edge/

"Some extensions on chrome store are not fully compatible, despite being installable. I'd advise to check out if they're offered on edge store too, and in that case look for the one with the most recent update. Most of times chrome version receives updates faster than edge's."
 
If an extension is turned off, can it still somehow be active in the background? I suppose if it is malicious, it can?

Otherwise, uninstalling them would probably be the safest thing to do. As this thread reminded me of doing that in Edge, reviewing my extensions, addons. I did uninstall a few in Chrome over the weekend.
FYI: You can turn off addons via: Extensity.
 
Yeah amirr there is no point in maintaining a extension or app with so few users. You're not making money or a difference in people's lives from so few users, may as well go contribute to open-source projects for the respect of the community or go try bug/exploit hunting to earn money.

If the software/extension is good enough people will pay either subscription or donate. People vote with their wallets more than their heart or brain.
 
It's a matter of probability, if we talk about security
Infection vs addon highjacking.
How often a security related addon really threatens a user? Until now, privacy issues have mostly occurred with reputable addons, not security related.
How often your system is prone to threats while online? It's up to you, mostly.

It's also a matter or probability, if we talk about functionality.
Infection vs addon compatibility issue
Again, How often a security related addon really threatens a user? Until now, mostly privacy issues have occured with reputable addons, not security related.
How often a compatibility issue may arise? it can happen easily.

But, in fact, the people's most important issue with the "dangerous" protection software, is the need of feel of control. Many people do not like that they are under the control of third party entities (addons, security software etc), so they prefer to have the situation at their hands, despite the fact that they will be more vulnerable this way.
Others just need best compatibility and I can understand that, so they keep minimal setups.
 

Recently browsing

Members who viewed this thread in the last 5 minutes

Back
Top