Advice Request Any real IDM alternative in 2022?

[Divine_Barakah]

Let me correct it for you: Windows network optimization is buggy. A guy had 300 Mbps speed on 1TB network before using TCP Optimizer. Windows defaults suck, there is no: all in one.

Chromium downloads it in 3 secs, Edge instantly, there is even no download window, but I have Edge optimized unlike Chromium.

View attachment 269994 View attachment 269995

Would Network Optimiser tool in Kerish Doctor help in this case?

 

[The_King]

I don't use any download manager by default, but I test whenever I find one. This one look very good and it's fast too. But similar to some other download managers like IDM, XDM, the disk write bytes is twice the size of the file. If you download a 20 MB file, 40 MB data will be written on the disk. But it's odd because unlike IDM, XDM which download parts of the file in a different temporary location, combine them and put into your download folder, this one is writing files at the same pre-allocated space as the download folder yet for some reason disk writes amount is twice the size of the file.
It doesn't happen with FDM, JDownloader2 and the old and dead EagleGet.
I'm also curious to know if enabling parallel downloading on Chromium browsers increases disk write bytes but it's hard to measure that.

Gave this a try and to be honest was not really impressed with it but I would have never seen that it is basically writing twice the amount of data to my NVME drive which means more wear and tear for nothing!

So it's really bad in IMHO for the health of your SDD or NVME drives. Uninstalling now.

 

[rashmi]

I don't use any download manager by default, but I test whenever I find one. This one look very good and it's fast too. But similar to some other download managers like IDM, XDM, the disk write bytes is twice the size of the file. If you download a 20 MB file, 40 MB data will be written on the disk. But it's odd because unlike IDM, XDM which download parts of the file in a different temporary location, combine them and put into your download folder, this one is writing files at the same pre-allocated space as the download folder yet for some reason disk writes amount is twice the size of the file.
It doesn't happen with FDM, JDownloader2 and the old and dead EagleGet.
I'm also curious to know if enabling parallel downloading on Chromium browsers increases disk write bytes but it's hard to measure that.

Have you tried Ant Download Manager? Is AntDM's "disk write bytes" the same?

 

[SeriousHoax]

Isn't torrent client better than download managers these days?

Torrents and regular downloads are different.

try this:

Eric's Project Page

Eric Kutcher's project hosting page. Download these fast, efficient, lightweight, and 100% free open-source Windows programs.

erickutcher.github.io

im using it for almost 8 months and don't have the issues you mentioned.

uses its own mechanism that others don't have:

I/O Completion Ports - Win32 apps

I/O completion ports provide an efficient threading model for processing multiple asynchronous I/O requests on a multiprocessor system.

learn.microsoft.com

This one is really a brilliant little program. I'm very surprised how tiny and effective this is. I needed to change a couple of things in settings to make it almost perfect. I enabled "Enable sparse file allocation" and disabled "Set date and time of file from server response". This is more than enough for any regular downloads except direct downloading of videos from websites. Thanks for this

If It doesn't have to be free try Ant. I had to move to it, because IDM stopped downloading YouTube Videos.. Lifetime license here: $26.00.......... Yearly $15.00 I think

JDownloader2 is the best IMO for YouTube downloads. They release updates multiple times every single day. Usually, any changes made by YouTube is fixed by the JDownloader2 team within a few hours. Never seen a program that updates this often.

Gave this a try and to be honest was not really impressed with it but I would have never seen that it is basically writing twice the amount of data to my NVME drive which means more wear and tear for nothing!

So it's really bad in IMHO for the health of your SDD or NVME drives. Uninstalling now.

I download everything on my HDD to not waste SSDs write cycles But even then, writing the double the amount is a waste in my opinion, so I avoid such things. I opened an issue on its GitHub asking if he can do something about it. There's a thing called "sparse file allocation" which I learned yesterday from HTTP Downloader that @Sunshine-boy linked above. It's not enabled by default on that download manager, but I prefer this method since if you download a 500 MB file and stop it at 50% then only 250 MB is written on the disk while on the other hand by default on that download manager as well as Ant Download Manager, full size of the file is written on the disk at the start and then download is started. So even if you stop let's say at 10%, full 500 MB is written on the disk. This is for Ant Download Manager and HTTP Downloader by default.
AB Download manager is weird because it writes the full size at get go and then start writing again over it which is super strange.
Sparse file allocation is used by Free Download Manager. So only the amount you download is written. That's my understanding at this point from testing. Probably I'm not wrong.

Have you tried Ant Download Manager? Is AntDM's "disk write bytes" the same?

Yeah, Ant is fine. Disk write bytes is the same as the file size. Nothing extra But full file size is written even if you don't finish the download (not a big deal I think). The UI isn't very pretty but looking at settings it seems like a decent IDM alternative with torrent support.

 

[rashmi]

Yeah, Ant is fine. Disk write bytes is the same as the file size. Nothing extra But full file size is written even if you don't finish the download (not a big deal I think). The UI isn't very pretty but looking at settings it seems like a decent IDM alternative with torrent support.

Yes, AntDM performs well, particularly for media downloads. The developer keeps up with YouTube changes and resolves bugs promptly. I bought two AntDM lifetime licenses following my experience with its trial and giveaway versions.

 

[Sunshine-boy]

enabled "Enable sparse file allocation" and disabled "Set date and time of file from server response". T

I did the same .