AV Comparitives Real World Protection Test-May

[Venustus]

Content source

http://www.av-comparatives.org/dynamic-tests/

http://chart.av-comparatives.org/chart1.php?chart=chart2&year=2015&month=5&sort=1&zoom=3

 

[marg]

Trend Micro & Panda better detection than Eset is hard to believe.

 

[Venustus]

Trend Micro & Panda better detection than Eset is hard to believe.

The test is based on "real world protection" not solely focussed on "detection"!
Compare:

 

[TrojanSmart]

Tencent

 

[jamescv7]

So for that test, seems a little fact where Avira and Bitdefender have definite spot than before where place on 1st and 2nd place.

However the problem rely on yellow marks which are never counted at all especially BB with user interaction approval like F-secure, Emsisoft, AVG and few others which should change the overall ranks.

 

[Deleted member 178]

Panda , i worth it !!!

Bora , Time to get kicks in !!!

 

[Venustus]

Panda , i worth it !!!

Bora , Time to get kicks in !!!

Looking at this implies Panda is better than Eset or am I somehow misinterpretting what you are trying to show??
Please elaborate!!

 

[Deleted member 178]

just that panda always claim to be strong as hell

 

[Venustus]

just that panda always claim to be strong as hell

Well I will definitely agree to that!!
Thanks for the laughs!!

 

[Nightwalker]

Trend Micro & Panda better detection than Eset is hard to believe.

Panda and Trend Micro have superb URL protection (web filter), but not necessarily better engines than Eset.

Eset is solid, no reason to worry

 

[MikeV]

hahahahahaha.....Joke of the day

 

[FireShootSK]

 

[OokamiCreed]

I always feel these tests are very inaccurate... I always get a bit or a lot different results. Panda better in real world test when compared to ESET, Bitdefender, Kaspersky, and Emsisoft? That's pretty funny... Get out of here with that.

 

[Cch123]

There is nothing surprising about Panda and Trend Micro performing well on this test. They are considered among the small group of AV companies that are trustable. Mind you, Trend Micro is the third largest provider of endpoint protections. In corporate environments, they shield against threats that home users will never imagine facing, and they would be ditched if they can't protect the networks. Also, their cloud reputation and behaviour blocker has improved by a lot in the 2015 edition.

As for Panda, they are one of the pioneers of cloud technologies and behaviour blockers. As mentioned by others, real world protection tests consider every aspect of the software and not just signature protection. Eset undoubtedly have some of the best signatures and its malware analysis teams are really fast at adding definitions. However, as always in such tests, there is the "luck" component.