And the lack of (AVG) system tray right-click options which Avast has.Not much; exactly the same as Avast minus scam detector.
And the lack of (AVG) system tray right-click options which Avast has.Not much; exactly the same as Avast minus scam detector.
Not anymore. The dedicated sandbox feature was deprecated a few years ago. Sandbox is only for CyberCapture now.Avast also has a feature to run app in Sandbox.
The free version?Avast also has a feature to run app in Sandbox.
I have Pro version.The free version?
Not so. The feature is alive and well in all paid versions: Premium, One, and Business. There's even the option always to run particular apps in the sandbox.Not anymore. The dedicated sandbox feature was deprecated a few years ago. Sandbox is only for CyberCapture now.
The sandbox was mentioned as a benefit in the ads materials for “the new Norton”.Not so. The feature is alive and well in all paid versions: Premium, One, and Business. There's even the option always to run particular apps in the sandbox.
In fact, I just found this feature also included in Norton 360 during my short trial just a few days ago.
Humm must just be your PC. I have seen just the opposite. If I had to choose Avast it would be "One"Avast one is slower with more bugs and lack selective component install compared to Avast "regular".
Comparing Avast one vs Avast regular on the exact same PC; no confounding factors.Humm must just be your PC. I have seen just the opposite. If I had to choose Avast it would be "One"
In fairness, I think Avast One has improved for stability in the four years since its initial release. The downside is that it isn't modular, as you say, like Norton 360.Avast one is slower with more bugs and lack selective component install compared to Avast "regular".
I can explain why Avast One is slower and has more bugs; when installing Avast "regular", I select the essential components only; Avast One has more components, more performance impact, and more bugs resulting from component-component interaction.In fairness, I think Avast One has improved for stability in the four years since released
I'm in complete agreement; you can count on Kaspersky for exceptional security and stability!nothing is even close to Kaspersky
My runs of Avast over these past couple of years have been bug-free as far as I can tell. Kaspersky is excellent software, however.I can explain why Avast One is slower and has more bugs; when installing Avast "regular", I select the essential components only; Avast One has more components, more performance impact, and more bugs resulting from component-component interaction.
Avast is my favorite 3rd party AV, but it is the second in bugs after Bitdefender; unfortunately, nothing is even close to Kaspersky.
Try setting Avast firewall mode to "ask" and to use Edge browser after selecting "allow" Edge when prompted; would Edge be able to connect to internet?My runs of Avast over these past couple of years have been bug-free as far as I can tell. Kaspersky is excellent software, however.
Done. I changed the firewall action for Edge to "ask." After starting up Edge, I allowed it on Avast's firewall prompt. I chose the most permissive rules offered—allow all TCP/UDP—and Edge worked fine. What rules were added to the firewall for you?Try setting Avast firewall mode to "ask" and to use Edge browser after selecting "allow" Edge when prompted; would Edge be able to connect to internet?
NB: You need to close Edge and launch it again after allowing to find out the bug.
I stand corrected.In fairness, I think Avast One has improved for stability in the four years since its initial release. The downside is that it isn't modular, as you say, like Norton 360.