Advice Request Best practices for setting up a new router: single vs multi-band SSID & firewall security level?

[Marko :)]

Some ISP are also strict with their equipments on Modem+Router.
There are times you need to do Mac Clone to get IP address on your personal router in case users ditch the provided one by ISP.

They do. If you are located anywhere in the EU that is illegal as EU regulation 2015/2120 applies to them. More specifically, article 3 which explicitly says:

1. End-users shall have the right to access and distribute information and content, use and provide applications and services, and use terminal equipment of their choice, irrespective of the end-user’s or provider’s location or the location, origin or destination of the information, content, application or service, via their internet access service.

2. Agreements between providers of internet access services and end-users on commercial and technical conditions and the characteristics of internet access services such as price, data volumes or speed, and any commercial practices conducted by providers of internet access services, shall not limit the exercise of the rights of end-users laid down in paragraph 1.

3. Providers of internet access services shall treat all traffic equally, when providing internet access services, without discrimination, restriction or interference, and irrespective of the sender and receiver, the content accessed or distributed, the applications or services used or provided, or the terminal equipment used.

The only catch? Your national regulator decides what the best model is; whether allowing you to completely ditch ISP router or just allowing you bridge mode. Croatian regulator HAKOM chose the second option. Despite that, there are instructions on local forums how to ditch the ISP equipment completely with disclaimer you're responsible for the consequences if ISP realizes you stopped using their equipment on your own.

 

[stonjean633]

They do. If you are located anywhere in the EU that is illegal as EU regulation 2015/2120 applies to them. More specifically, article 3 which explicitly says:




The only catch? Your national regulator decides what the best model is; whether allowing you to completely ditch ISP router or just allowing you bridge mode. Croatian regulator HAKOM chose the second option. Despite that, there are instructions on local forums how to ditch the ISP equipment completely with disclaimer you're responsible for the consequences if ISP realizes you stopped using their equipment on your own.

That's the thing. Regulators are likely not Tech peeps. They are mostly based on theory and not actual hands on. What's best on paper sometimes is not the best in real-world.

 

[Halp2001]

From what I understood about your situation @lokamoka820 , there are a few different things involved (ISP router, Archer C6 and repeater), so I think it helps to look at each topic separately:

1. Separate SSIDs (2.4 GHz / 5 GHz)
If your goal is to choose which devices connect to 2.4 GHz and which use 5 GHz, then using separate SSIDs makes sense. Otherwise, if everything is working well with a single SSID, I'd probably just leave it as it is and let the router handle the band selection.

2. DNS settings
If your ISP router doesn't allow you to change the DNS servers, there may not be much you can do on the router itself. In that case, the simplest solution is to configure your preferred DNS on Windows, Linux, or on the individual devices where you want to use it.

3. Firewall level
I'd probably keep the firewall set to Medium. It usually provides a good balance between security and compatibility. A higher setting doesn't always offer a noticeable security benefit, but depending on the router it may occasionally cause unnecessary connectivity issues.

4. Wi-Fi repeater
This is the only part I'm not completely sure about. What are you trying to achieve with the repeater? Do you simply want it to keep working with the new ISP router, or are you planning to use it together with your Archer C6 again? I think understanding your goal here would make it much easier to suggest the most suitable setup.

 

[Marko :)]

That's the thing. Regulators are likely not Tech peeps. They are mostly based on theory and not actual hands on. What's best on paper sometimes is not the best in real-world.

I can't say for other countries, but HAKOM is autonomous, independent, non-profit legal entity with public authority. Here government doesn't regulate electronic communications, postal and railway services; this is regulated by HAKOM.

So as an independent and autonomous entity, they have to wage in user and ISP interests equally. Every time a new law is written, you as a citizen can enter discussion online using your eCitizen account and state your opinion freely. This was the case for router regulation too. People wrote what they'd like to see as part of the law just like ISPs did. I'd link the discussion here, but I lost the link and I don't feel like searching thousands of discussions. If I remember correctly, citizens said they want total control, ISPs answered it's not possible because they can't guarantee compatibility with user equipment with their own fiber equipment in residential buildings as well as traffic exchanges centers. Something like that was discussed, so as a middle ground, it was chosen they have to offer bridge mode if user wants.

Also if you have issues with the ISP and your complaints were denied, you go straight to HAKOM. Then they represent you in dispute with the ISP. In most cases, the dispute is resolved in user favor, though there were the cases ISPs were fined. Usually all complaints are resolved on first try before reaching HAKOM, because ISPs don't want this to go far. Not a good look if it all ends up in media.

 

[lokamoka820]

Unfortunately, that means the setting is there purely as a decoration. They probably couldn't hide it, just lock it behind the admin account.

They used to make the option grayed out in the previous routers from the same ISP, so I thought that things were different now that I have the option to change it, but it's pointless. In any case, I always change my DNS from my devices. Thank you for your assistance.

What brand is the router and extender? Every router will work with every extender, but you won't be able to get mesh network mixing two different brands (unless both support Wi-Fi EasyMesh standard).

The extender is a Nokia Wi-Fi beacon, and the router is an Orange Nokia.

Do you have mesh network currently?

No, I don't have a mesh network.

 

[stonjean633]

They used to make the option grayed out in the previous routers from the same ISP, so I thought that things were different now that I have the option to change it, but it's pointless. In any case, I always change my DNS from my devices. Thank you for your assistance.

The extender is a Nokia Wi-Fi beacon, and the router is an Orange Nokia.

No, I don't have a mesh network.

You can also change configs/DNS thru SSH. Not sure if Nokia got SSH enabled or it can be thru the GUI.

 

[Marko :)]

So, if I'm still understanding correctly, you'd like to connect your TP-Link Archer with this new router so you can change DNS, right?

You said:

I connected the repeater yesterday using the quick setup guide, and it is functioning, but I am unable to access its control panel to check its settings.

Some routers, including mine Asus have option to limit devices which have access to the web UI page. That is likely preventing you from visiting it when you're connected on TP-Link Archer. See if you can find anything similar in Nokia's web UI.

You can also change configs/DNS thru SSH. Not sure if Nokia got SSH enabled or it can be thru the GUI.

If they blocked ability to change DNS through web UI, then they also likely blocked SSH too.

 

[lokamoka820]

So, if I'm still understanding correctly, you'd like to connect your TP-Link Archer with this new router so you can change DNS, right?

I'm unsure whether to connect the TP-Link Archer router because the ISP maintenance worker told my family that there was no need to do so when he installed the new router because the signal was stronger, and it had already been used as an access point rather than a full router. My family members don't change their DNS settings; I'm the only one who does that.

Regarding the extender/repeater, I thought I could use the username and password on the label to log in and configure it as I wanted, but it didn't have an IP address like the router, so I checked the IP that the router had automatically assigned and found it was 192.168.1.29. However, when I tried to enter the username and password, I got an error. I restarted the router, and now it has the IP 2A01:9700:415A:8D01:2EC1:F4FF:FEA7:1BD1. I tried again, but it gave me the following error. I'm not sure if it should have settings or if it's just to be connected and configured using its WPS button, as stated in the quick setup guide.

Some routers, including mine Asus have option to limit devices which have access to the web UI page. That is likely preventing you from visiting it when you're connected on TP-Link Archer. See if you can find anything similar in Nokia's web UI.

It doesn't have any options other than the basics for a simple router, it is even less configurable than their previous router which was having more options than this one.