H
hjlbx
Added - Comodo Internet Security 8 (free).
Now... this is where all your fun starts.
Added - Comodo Internet Security 8 (free).
So true, ..and now my training in the power of the 'Dark Side' can be made complete!!Now... this is where all your fun starts.
Cute! My wife likes it too. And I voted yes I used Emsisoft but now using another program which happens to be Bitdefender Total Security 2015 that's why I asked about compatibility with Malwarebytes, I used it on WIN 7 pro but it slowed down when I added BD TS 2015,So true, ..and now my training in the power of the 'Dark Side' can be made complete!!
Cute! My wife likes it too. And I voted yes I used Emsisoft but now using another program which happens to be Bitdefender Total Security 2015 that's why I asked about compatibility with Malwarebytes, I used it on WIN 7 pro but it slowed down when I added BD TS 2015,
now my OS is WIN 8.1 Pro 32-bit and BD runs better "BUT" haven't tried adding MB's after getting some feedback and so far your link has instructions on what to do..Thanks
Cute! My wife likes it too. And I voted yes I used Emsisoft but now using another program which happens to be Bitdefender Total Security 2015 that's why I asked about compatibility with Malwarebytes, I used it on WIN 7 pro but it slowed down when I added BD TS 2015,
now my OS is WIN 8.1 Pro 32-bit and BD runs better "BUT" haven't tried adding MB's after getting some feedback and so far your link has instructions on what to do..Thanks
Thanks!That's cute...
Thank you hjlbx for your advice, appreciate all the different responses and community experience on this subject.I think BD made some improvements to help along W8.1 compatibility.
I would not see why BD and MBAE would not get along. I have seen nothing on the security forums regarding any issues between the two.
If need be MBAE uninstalls fairly cleanly... all you can do is try.
Thank you @illumination. I've been following 'Tips' from wise members (you know whom you are) and receiving suggestions from on High whilst having a bit more fun ..like streaming "Game of Thrones" from hbogo.com.LOL at the last selection in your above pole!
Config is looking good
Good for you, never liked adware pro. There are a few around these parts that consider themselves "experts/professionals" that run nothing but that application for security, and i have helped them clean/fix those systems a few times.Windows 8.1:
Removed - AdAware Pro.
Used as a scanner with realtime protection at 'off' while using Avast!, I'd nearly forgotten AdAware was installed until a popup window repeatedly announced initiation of an unknown installation taking place I would then stop. Also, startups & shut downs became very slow, even requiring me to force shutdowns while in Shadow Defender's 'Shadow Mode'.
Following performing a restore to a previous system state (approx. 1 month earlier) the system feels like it's old self ..only newer!
Thank you! Although I'd refrained from blaming a handful of apps, my gut informed me something had to be removed. Your insight never fails to increase my confidence while also granting my self esteem a boost with a needed shot in the arm (*Sans needles!) of 'smart juice'!Good for you, never liked adware pro. There are a few around these parts that consider themselves "experts/professionals" that run nothing but that application for security, and i have helped them clean/fix those systems a few times.
Never has there been a truer statement.Lol!!
Yes, you have discovered the secret to happiness (apart from EAM.., yet linked directly to ESET) and far more valuable than the fountain of youth.
Happy wife = Happy life!
Cats-4_Owners-2 said: Lol!!
Yes, you have discovered the secret to happiness (apart from EAM.., yet linked directly to ESET) and far more valuable than the fountain of youth.
Happy wife = Happy life!
When you're fortunate enough to be visited upon by the graces of both lightness hitched to a wagon besides smooth functionality, even when speaking from an array of differently configured Windows systems from many different points of view, it would be quite believable if different people had greatly varying outcomes using ESET. Sometimes, but this hasn't been the case. As well as having been mentioned, however honorably, among the more popularly coveted paid alternatives I have read about, ESET has remained a sought after choice shoulder to shoulder with Emsisoft & Kaspersky; and if one considers the vastly known galaxy of free alternatives, there's a whole battalion of up and coming free alternatives. Why then does ESET Smart Security work so agreeably on my wife's Sony Vaio? I can only join my voice by also happily asking the question (which is also very telling!) as thus far what I shall state is that it balances functionality without putting forth the proverbial hard sell. IE: What they lack are annoying pop up windows & the incessant e-mails which announce the protection we'd miss out on would also leave us dangerously vulnerable. No one likes those. On the other hand, I'll credit contributors on Malware Tips for placing ESET's name among the positive words added to my Antivirus/Security thesaurus such as 'good', 'light', and 'protection'.You can say that again my brother! My biggest concern is once my wife's Eset license expires, I will get the boot. I guess I better make sure that never happens because I don't want to live outdoors. One thing related to my Wife's love of all that is Eset. She has Eset SS 8.0 on her laptop and the specs on that machine are middling at best. Even so, she loves how light it feels with none of the slow boots that are part and parcel of many security suites.
My question is how can Smart Security be this light, and yet so many people who populate this forum and others complain that it's actually very heavy. I know that Eset SS and the antivirus product basically load everything into memory which helps greatly in keeping boot times fast, along with little to no impact when copying files, internet surfing, and general multitasking. If I am wrong or right about this, please explain why, so that I may understand.. Look at an independent lab like AV Comp. Eset always or almost always ranks in the top three for performance, but even better, Eset does it with nary a false positive. I will take the AVC score under the "Real World" test results in the range of lets say 96% to 98% because Eset almost never has a false positive. The trade off is worth it to me. Not to mention when you tweak the settings properly Eset performs that much better. The Eset SS firewall is improving all the time and I love that my browsers home page explodes open so quickly like no other firewall I've tested. SpyShelter Firewall 9.8 comes very close.
Hello @Huracan. Yes! Currently I spend considerably more time on the lubuntu 14.04 than the XP it's duel booted besides, and LastPass just quit working on Chrome. *Looks gratefully toward Mount Mozilla*Could the old XP system be axed?