New Update CIS 2025 is now LIVE!

[rashmi]

"Katarina Glamoslija (Lead Cybersecurity Editor)"

"Neil J. Rubenking, Lead Analyst for Security"

"Tibor Moes, Founder & Chief Editor at SoftwareLab
Tibor Moes studied Cybersecurity at Stanford"

"The reviews are like... a duo of regular typists and a typist++ reviewing a tech innovation!"

 

[Behold Eck]

Well I’ve always said that Eset is not amazing, which has caused members to attack me. Is it fair to say that we’ve got evidence for this now? Or am I “making Eset look bad”?

It was me that said that! How dare you try and steal my thunder(and lightning) you`re the one that has a go at Comodo.

Regards Eck

 

[Helmut]

a mix of mental pathology with ignorance, irresponsibility and immorality:

That says everything about the writer.
Should I say that Comodo has let me down when it isn't true, that I have X malware when it isn't true.
Who does his intelligent assessment of others apply to? Of 5 fingers, 4 point at yourself.

Chuck57​

That's akin to me buying a new pistol and shooting myself in the leg because I filed the trigger sear instead shooting it smooth, then having anti gun types try to blame Smith and Wesson for what I did.​

"Katarina Glamoslija (Lead Cybersecurity Editor)"

"Neil J. Rubenking, Lead Analyst for Security"

"Tibor Moes, Founder & Chief Editor at SoftwareLab
Tibor Moes studied Cybersecurity at Stanford"

rashmi​

"The reviews are like... a duo of regular typists and a typist++ reviewing a tech innovation!"

The IT expert who taught me how to use Comodo had a better knowledge 20-25 years ago than some people here who accuse others of being mentally ill. How pathetic!
No wonder that today he is still the top priority in one of the largest companies in Germany: security, monitoring, allocation of rights to employees.
And these are not bedtime stories like the ones told by self-proclaimed experts. I admit that I'm a layman, but I'm not trying to act like I'm being a smug person.

 

[Helmut]

Not smug person but I'm not trying to pretend to be an expert.

 

[ForgottenSeer 114717]

never as a "complete and absolutely unbeatable security system" (as Comodo advertises on its webpage, and as its fans promote it).

Provide a link that goes to an official Comodo webpage that says "absolutely unbeatable."

The web is full of mostly NEGATIVE reviews and analysis confirming that Comodo = Garbage. Only blind fanatics don't see the reality... a mix of mental pathology with ignorance, irresponsibility and immorality:

"For many years, Comodo made regular appearances in test reports from AV-Test Institute. The best possible score from this lab is 18 points, six apiece for protection, performance, and usability. Comodo generally scored on the low side, coming in as low as 12.5 and averaging about 15 points. The best products routinely hit 18 points, or at least 17.5. In any case, Comodo hasn't chosen to participate with this lab's testing since 2019.

One lab that has reported on Comodo recently is London-based SE Labs, whose researchers use a capture-and-replay technique to hit a collection of antivirus utilities with precisely the same real-world malware attacks. Each antivirus can earn certification at five levels: AAA, AA, A, B, and C. For the last couple of years, Comodo has regularly attained AA certification (Decopi' comment: AA is incredible mediocre!... because AAA certification made up 84% of the ratings, therefore Comodo performance is below 84% of all security software market tests. It's also important to mention that there is no meaningful lab test result if it doesn't include 12 months in a row.)"
___________________________________________________________________________

Katarina Glamoslija (Lead Cybersecurity Editor), May 30, 2024:

Honestly, I struggle to recommend Comodo right now — there are just too many things wrong with it. There are much better free options out there.

Comodo doesn’t detect malware as effectively as top antivirus competitors.

Comodo’s other features aren’t any good, though. Since Comodo hasn’t had a decent update since 2021, the anti-phishing, secure browser, and ad blocker all underperform.

Also, Comodo used to offer a VPN and cloud storage on its paid plan, but these have been discontinued, leaving only 24/7 tech support and a virus-guarantee as its paid-for features — making Comodo’s paid plans one of the worst-value offers on the market.

Although all of Comodo’s core security features are free, you’re better off looking at other options if you want decent protection. Avira is our top free antivirus in 2024, and Norton is our top pick for a full-featured paid internet security suite.

Comodo’s scanner isn’t the best on the market, by a long shot. You can’t fully rely on the Quick Scan, and the Full Scan’s detection rates aren’t as good as other competitors. If you want a free antivirus with a reliable scanner, you’re better off getting Bitdefender’s free package instead, which has one of the best malware scanners around.

Comodo’s real-time scanner is okay, but it’s not nearly as good as the best antivirus programs in 2024.

Comodo’s anti-phishing feature is disappointing. It doesn’t work as well as Chrome’s default protections and lacks compatibility with most web browsers. If you’re worried about phishing attacks, you’re better off using Norton or McAfee (or even just sticking with Chrome’s default protections).

Comodo’s Virtual Desktop is definitely aimed at more advanced users. Your average everyday user only really needs a secure antivirus program, which will automatically detect and block all malware files on their system without requiring an additional testing step.

Can Comodo Protect All of Your Devices in 2024? In a word — no. Comodo is not a good antivirus in 2024, especially when compared to top competitors.

Firstly, Comodo no longer supports macOS or Linux, and its iOS app is extremely limited, so Comodo is only really worth considering for Windows and Android users — despite Comodo’s own website suggesting otherwise.

Comodo’s antivirus scanner isn’t as good as any of those on our top 10 antiviruses in 2024 list, its anti-phishing feature is poor, and most of its additional features are also not very good.

Comodo’s developers have also abandoned many of its other features — namely the cloud storage and VPN. None of these features work in 2024, yet are still mentioned all over its website. The ones that haven’t been outright left behind haven’t seen a significant upgrade in several years, making them fall behind modern standards.

Overall, I really wouldn’t recommend Comodo. Its free plan is simply not as good as others available, and its paid plan is definitely not worth the money.
___________________________________________________________________________

Tibor Moes, Founder & Chief Editor at SoftwareLab, January 2024
Tibor Moes studied Cybersecurity at Stanford.

We Tested 28 Brands, Comodo is ranked #28 of the 28 (last place).

Comodo offers a broad range of features, but disappointingly, many underperform. Its virus scanner only found 93% of the malware samples, which is below average.

Comodo’s additional features like phishing protection, secure browser, and ad blocker fail to meet expectations. Plus, it still promotes the non-existent cloud backup and VPN features.

On top of that, Comodo does not participate in the independent tests by AV-Test, which is not a good sign.
___________________________________________________________________________

Published by Neil J. Rubenking, Lead Analyst for Security, July 17, 2024:

Cons (results Comodo's tests):
- Failed against several ransomware samples
- Poor to dismal scores in our hands-on tests
- Advanced features too technical for many users
- Independent lab test results sparse

"For many years, Comodo made regular appearances in test reports from AV-Test Institute. The best possible score from this lab is 18 points, six apiece for protection, performance, and usability. Comodo generally scored on the low side, coming in as low as 12.5 and averaging about 15 points. The best products routinely hit 18 points, or at least 17.5. In any case, Comodo hasn't chosen to participate with this lab's testing since 2019.

One lab that has reported on Comodo recently is London-based SE Labs, whose researchers use a capture-and-replay technique to hit a collection of antivirus utilities with precisely the same real-world malware attacks. Each antivirus can earn certification at five levels: AAA, AA, A, B, and C. For the last couple of years, Comodo has regularly attained AA certification (Decopi' comment: AA is incredible mediocre!... because AAA certification made up 84% of the ratings, therefore Comodo performance is below 84% of all security software market tests. It's also important to mention that there is no meaningful lab test result if it doesn't include 12 months in a row.)"

Its features are quite buggy, its design is a bit outdated, and it spots lots of false positives, which makes me question its level of security.
Many features don’t work well.
Gets incomplete third-party test scores
Signs of potentially shoddy coding.
Apps looks and feel outdated.
Incorrectly marks legitimate files as malware.

Independent antivirus test labs frequently compare antivirus programs. Comodo is not one of the most popular antivirus suites, so test results for it are few and far between. PC Magazine found that Comodo handled hand-modified ransomware samples poorly. This tells you that its heuristics engine isn’t quite up to snuff. Advanced or customized threats might slip through the cracks.
In my testing, I found that it incorrectly identified Lavasoft Web Companion as malware. Additionally, it appeared to terminate its own components as if they were malware, casting doubt on its effectiveness.

While Comodo Antivirus is available for the low price of free, it does not compete very well with other options, especially the ones mentioned on our best antivirus list.
Throughout my testing of Comodo Internet Security, I found lots of red flags. Components didn’t install correctly. Features like the task manager don’t work. The Linux version may not have been updated since 2013. Scanning occurred even when the software was disabled, locking up my computer.
Most importantly, few independent security labs have evaluated its performance. This means that your device’s security might not be up to date while the program functions as your main antivirus and antimalware solution.
If you’re looking to protect your computer from a wide range of real-world threats, other options may be a better choice.

With just one lab test score available, my hands-on testing results become especially important. To start my malware protection testing, I open a folder containing malware samples that I've collected and analyzed myself. Comodo immediately started wiping out the samples it recognized, quickly eliminating 44% of them. That’s low for on-sight detection. Tested with this same set of samples, Norton AntiVirus Plus eliminated 73% on sight and Bitdefender Antivirus Plus nabbed 72%. When Comodo recognized and deleted a sample, it reported “Malware Stopped” even though the malware never started.
Continuing the test, I launched each sample that wasn't wiped out in the initial culling. For unrecognized programs it offered a choice: run the program in the sandbox container system (more about that system below); run the program with no limitations; or block all execution. Since it did not identify those programs as malicious, just unrecognized, I chose the container option. Other reactions included: running in the container without asking; blocking programs from launching; catching malware activities after the initial launch; and totally whiffing on malware detection.
My analysis tools revealed installation of anywhere from two to 50 malware-related executable files by those samples. In each case, I dug into advanced settings and reset the container, discarding its contents. And in each case doing so made no difference—the executable files remained.
One way or another, Comodo detected 78% of the samples, the lowest detection rate among recent programs. If it had perfectly blocked installation of all detected threats, it could have parlayed that into 7.8 of 10 possible points. As noted, I found that some detected malware still planted some executable files on the system, and some of those were even running. Those slip-ups dragged its score down to a dismal 7.0 points.
Tested with the same set of samples, Aura, Avast, AVG AntiVirus Free, Malwarebytes Premium Security, and Norton reached 99% detection. Avast and AVG managed 9.9 of 10 possible points. Looking at antivirus apps tested with earlier malware collections, only a handful have scored lower than Comodo.
Out of 100 verified malware-hosting URLs, Comodo Online Security blocked exactly two, despite the promise that it “instantly blocks dangerous and fraudulent websites”. Comodo did eliminate some malware immediately after download, but still missed quite a few. In all, Comodo protected against 63% of the malware downloads, only two recent antivirus programs have scored lower in this test. At the other end of the spectrum, Bitdefender, Guardio, Sophos Home, Trend Micro Antivirus+ Security, and ZoneAlarm Free Antivirus all scored a perfect 100%.
Subpar Ransomware Protection: Comodo doesn’t include a layer of protection specific to ransomware. My collection includes a dozen ransomware samples and a couple that are ransomware-adjacent. All the other antivirus tools I’ve tested recently either wiped these out on sight or eliminated them before they could launch. I was surprised to discover that Comodo only wiped out five of those on sight. On the plus side, that left me with nine ransomware samples for testing. I launched each surviving sample and noted just what happened. Comodo caught five more samples at this stage. Two of the remaining four completely eluded Comodo’s detection. One wiped the (virtual) hard drive of the test system. The other encrypted about 3,500 files, including everything in the Documents folder, and displayed its ransom note. Again, Comodo doesn’t build in protection specific to ransomware. With two samples totally missed and one caught but not completely, it exhibited partial protection in my test. The containment system did its job, to a point, but failed to contain all the ransomware activity. For comparison, competitors including Bitdefender and Norton managed to foil all or most of the same samples with regular real-time antivirus components turned off, relying strictly on their respective ransomware-fighting components.

Features like KillSwitch, HIPS, and the sandbox containment system might make Comodo Free Antivirus attractive to techies, but those same techies will be put off by its poor showing in tests and its continued lack of progress over time. One independent lab gives it a decent rating, but its scores in our hands-on testing range from poor to dismal.
The Bottom Line: Comodo Free Antivirus includes many high-end bonus features, but independent antivirus testing labs have little to say about it, and it fares poorly in our own hands-on tests.
___________________________________________________________________________

SafetyDetectives is a paid marketing & promotion website. The SafetyDetectives website even has a banner stating this fact.

Nevertheless, everybody has an opinion - to which they are entitled unless you happen to live under the yoke of an authoritarian regime. You think there are members here who are "insane Comodo fanatics that are leading unwitting users down the path of pain, doom, and destruction with their videos and defense of the product."

Now who is more insane? Someone (@Decopi) who comes here every time there is a Comodo discussion and rage posts (with walls of text full of ad hominems) or a person that creates a video that clearly demonstrates that the product works against that\those particular malware sample\samples?

Nobody - I know I never have - and @cruelsister has never said it - that "Comodo is unbeatable."

I think @Decopi has an English interpretation problem - he assigns the meaning to words and statements in a manner fully twisted by him to meet his anti-Comodo agenda.

@cruelsister keep making those vids. Fill this entire forum with them. This is how you fight those that hate you so much.

 

[ForgottenSeer 114717]

We've heard that. You are one of the two-three people on here whose vinyl needs changing.
I heard you hear and a half ago.
I'd think for this time you may change and you have, your tone is softer this time, but you still got lessons to learn.

Nothing needs to change.

The fact that the product is given away at $0 always has and will determine its "quality."

If you developed a product, supported its infrastructure, paid for the personnel to support it, plus all the other expenses and then gave it away to the world for $0, then you too would not be willing to expend the resources required to make it "polished." You would set a budget and stick to it.

It makes no sense whatsoever to put a lot of effort or resources into something that generates $0 in profit (100% free).

This basic principle - "The Rule of Free" - so simple a 5 year old child understands it. No other explanation for the "quality" of Comodo is required. Which, given it is 100% free, it outperforms a lot of paid security software.

Let's take a look in the mirror... you need to change your vinyl. Because you keep saying the same thing over-and-over without regard to the fact that Comodo is a profitless, 100% free product. On that basis one cannot expect bug-free or top AV, phishing, etc modules (which none of those are needed anyways).

Someone once said "Well Microsoft does not charge home users for Defender" and while that is technically true, it is not 100% free. All the home users are Microsoft's guinea pigs and are sharing data & files with Microsoft without ever knowing it. If data sharing or telemetry is required or enabled by default or not easily disabled, then the product is not 100% free. The payment is in a form that is not money.

 

[Trident]

Not smug person but I'm not trying to pretend to be an expert.

I’ll download an audiobook if I wanna hear a story.

You are so hungry for my attention, you are double-posting. Sorry, I got better things to do.

With all these long, emotional, dramatic, heartbreaking narratives, who are you trying to convince? Yourself or us?
If you were so confident in the quality of Comodo, you wouldn’t work overtime defending it, registering specifically to discuss it and posting every hour. The fact that you are doing that, clearly shows that you, just like all of us, realise you are using not-so-great solution.

 

[Trident]

so simple a 5 year old child understands it

And yet you fail to understand.

A lot of vendors provide products for free. Usually it is one modular codebase that spawns across business and home products, in different variations.

Comodo is not profitless — the same codebase that’s powering the home products has been used as foundation for the Xcitium products.

Had Comodo management been a tad bit smarter, the two codebases could be entirely merged, so that updates to Xcitium will be reflected in home products.

Comodo also offers paid versions to home users.
Although you will argue that the payment is for “malware warranty”, where does this malware warranty go? In my account? How many people actually submit a claim and get rewarded from this insurance?

It makes no sense whatsoever to put a lot of effort or resources into something that generates $0 in profit (100% free).

And yet other vendors put effort.

On that basis one cannot expect bug-free or top AV, phishing, etc modules (which none of those are needed anyways).

On what basis do you claim that these modules are not needed? Have you got evidence to support that home users are not exposed to threats such as Phishing?

All the home users are Microsoft's guinea pigs and are sharing data & files with Microsoft without ever knowing it. If data sharing or telemetry is required or enabled by default or not easily disabled, then the product is not 100% free.

Comodo is Harvesting files through their Valkyrie system too. Valkyrie can be turned off and just as easily, the same could be done with Defender telemetry. It’s one switch.

it outperforms a lot of paid security software

Which paid security software did it outperform, where and when?

Lastly, I think you missed the point where I told you that the Comodo quality is of 0 interest to me and my only problem is vicious Comodo fanboys jumping on users to defend garbage. Did you read that? Go back and read again. If you are experiencing difficulties reading it clearly, tweak your device accessibility settings or visit your local ophthalmologist for more help.

 

[Helmut]

I’ll download an audiobook if I wanna hear a story.

You are so hungry for my attention, you are double-posting. Sorry, I got better things to do.

With all these long, emotional, dramatic, heartbreaking narratives, who are you trying to convince? Yourself or us?
If you were so confident in the quality of Comodo, you wouldn’t work overtime defending it, registering specifically to discuss it and posting every hour. The fact that you are doing that, clearly shows that you, just like all of us, realise you are using not-so-great solution.

Here the proverb applies again (even if I don't particularly like proverbs):
With one finger outstretched, 4 point back.
Ad-hominems!

Sorry, I got better things to do.

Then why don't you do it?

 

[rashmi]

I think @Decopi has an English interpretation problem - he assigns the meaning to words and statements in a manner fully twisted by him to meet his anti-Comodo agenda.

Like a linguistic contortion... bends words and meanings to fit his own unique, anti-Comodo phantasm!

 

[Helmut]

Now who is more insane? Someone (@Decopi) who comes here every time there is a Comodo discussion and rage posts (with walls of text full of ad hominems) or a person that creates a video that clearly demonstrates that the product works against that\those particular malware sample\samples?

Purely factually relevant (as well as my opinion - Text shortened to the most factual):

App Review - COMODO Internet Security 2025 Premium

@Shadowra I also find it very funny that none of the people who criticize you simply make such a video themselves to show that you are wrong. Instead they write long texts with their arguments without proof :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO: BTW Thanks for the great videos, I find them very enriching as a...

malwaretips.com

kailyn Jun 11, 2024 #115
Decopi ...... is just speculating ......His "argument" is that CIS's other components are so weak that if containment is disabled there is an absolute certainty that a user will get infected. It is just another way for this person to bash CIS while giving the appearance that he is making a credible statement of fact. Quite frankly, his argument is amateurish to the point of being ridiculous

Correction:
This is so not true. I was already logged in, but for whatever reason I had to register again and it worked with my "old" data.

Trident
registering specifically to discuss it

Oh, I had to write now: to all users discussing here but Trident - who feels very important:

You are so hungry for my attention

4 Fingers back!!

 

[n8chavez]

Here's a thought...everyone shut the hell up! This thread is about egos now, not helping and informing people, and it shouldn't continue if it's going to be one needless measuring contest with no purpose.

Great, now you've done it. I feel like Frank Costanza! Serenity Now!

 

[Trident]

who feels very important:

Once again, I just wake up and I’m being honoured in your posts, not even once, but twice. Not sure how else to interpret it.

Then why don't you do it?

Had a great weekend, now time to focus on things that matter to me. Your ranting doesn’t. Sorry.

Ad-hominems!

Yep, you don’t like to read the truth and you automatically classify it as ad-hominem.

 

[Helmut]

This thread is about egos now

The beginning:
Decopi #25
an irresponsible gang of fanatics is always pushing garbage to users, exploiting false mantras such as: ........

Trident #26
When people claim to be experts and then go around manipulating users’ opinions by publishing unrealistic tests and claiming that a forgotten already solution, jam packed with bugs and holes, developed as a hobby project in someone’s bedrooms is the most powerful, it becomes evident how much they are experts.

Then comes with #56 from Behold Eck as well as #58 from him very factual posts, which is commented on as follows:

#59 Trident
Once again, fanboyism is being caught. Why do you need to offend the user sharing their experience that they are trolling by stealth?
Note: There was no offence nor a fanboyism!

From Decopi's post #25, i.e. from #26 to #56, purely factual posts followed, until egos, rather personal attacks, initially more reserved, then to the point of calling others mentally ill.

 

[Behold Eck]

The beginning:
Decopi #25
an irresponsible gang of fanatics is always pushing garbage to users, exploiting false mantras such as: ........

Trident #26
When people claim to be experts and then go around manipulating users’ opinions by publishing unrealistic tests and claiming that a forgotten already solution, jam packed with bugs and holes, developed as a hobby project in someone’s bedrooms is the most powerful, it becomes evident how much they are experts.

Then comes with #56 from Behold Eck as well as #58 from him very factual posts, which is commented on as follows:

#59 Trident
Once again, fanboyism is being caught. Why do you need to offend the user sharing their experience that they are trolling by stealth?
Note: There was no offence nor a fanboyism!

From Decopi's post #25, i.e. from #26 to #56, purely factual posts followed, until egos, rather personal attacks, initially more reserved, then to the point of calling others mentally ill.

FYI I`ve come across a photograph of them watching a CS video tutorial together. A hard act to please.

Regards Eck

 

[Trident]

Note: There was no offence nor a fanboyism!

Except, there was.

The user was recommended by MalwareTips experts to install Comodo, and not one of the many security solutions. Something that is illogical, irrational, whatever. Needless to say it is user’s fault for following these irrational recommendations too!

The same user then came to leave feedback that the software didn’t work for them. This feedback has been left on many forums, many times, including on the Comodo’s official one.

The experts who constantly swear by Comodo and push it to every user asking for recommendations, replied:

• I think you are trolling
• You are not following “guidelines”
• You like to restore from images, so all good

And then we were presented with Grimm-brother-tales, from a man who by my calculations is about ~50-55 years old, specially registered on a forum to promote his favourite AV. These tales were tailored to make the user look incompetent and stupid, which later was implied by a third user, namely Rasmi, who at least had the decency to say it directly.

It would get even worse (as we’ve seen times and times again), with a few more experts coming around, playing the role of sidekicks, but I interfered and the whole attention is now on me, so it doesn’t have to be on @tofargone

This is the essence and lifecycle of every Comodo discussion.
@Behold Eck nice pic you got there, but we ain’t old

 

[Behold Eck]

Since Comodo became an abandonware in 2017, the official Comodo forum has become a N**i concentration camp, where criticism is immediately censored by deleting users. It is natural, since the software has not worked for years, it is necessary to appeal to fanaticism, cause and effect. Here at MT, fortunately an open and democratic space, Comodo fanatics cannot delete users. And as long as the democratic environment exists at MT, Comodo fanatics, fortunately, will not be able to delete users or criticism.

Another bad habit of the official Comodo forum is to methodically and systematically delete the lists of bugs that are reported daily. But there are so many reported bugs, and they have been accumulated for so many years, that some lists of bugs miraculously manage to survive. For example: List of current bugs

Also here: List of current bugs discussion

And here: Bug Reports - CIS

And the lists above may seem like a lot of reported bugs, but as I explained, in the last years more than 25 long lists of bugs were methodically and systematically deleted from the official Comodo forum. They add up to more than 500 dangerous, old, and never fixed bugs.

Few days ago, in a rare and weird event, a Comodo employee mistakenly posted a list of 100 bugs (I feel sorry for him, he will certainly be fired from Comodo soon). I attach the image below. I repeat, this is not a list reported by users. This is a list of bugs officially recognized by Comodo staff. And 99% of the bugs there are around 7 years old!

For all those non-fanatics, or passive readers who read us in silence, and for all the visitors who will read us in the future, here is the truth:

COMODO IS AN ABANDONWARE (2017), FULL OF HUNDRED OF DANGEROUS UNFIXED BUGS, THEREFORE SOFTWARE WITHOUT UPDATES/UPGRADES SHOULD NOT BE USED. THAT SAID, EVERYONE IS FREE TO USE WHATEVER THEY WANT, BUT IN THAT CASE, IT IS IMPORTANT TO UNDERSTAND THAT COMODO IS NOT AN ANTIVIRUS/ANTIMALWARE, IT IS ONLY A BLOCKER, THE DECISION TO BLOCK OR NOT TO BLOCK ALWAYS DEPENDS ON THE USER.

View attachment 284979

Okay it might have a few nicks and bumps but that`s part of it`s charm I think,as long as it works.

@Behold Eck nice pic you got there, but we ain’t old

Of course not, NURSE! NURSE! THEY`RE OUT OF THEIR CHAIRS AND AT IT AGAIN.

Regards Eck

 

[Chuck57]

Except, there was.

The user was recommended by MalwareTips experts to install Comodo, and not one of the many security solutions. Something that is illogical, irrational, whatever. Needless to say it is user’s fault for following these irrational recommendations too!

The same user then came to leave feedback that the software didn’t work for them. This feedback has been left on many forums, many times, including on the Comodo’s official one.

Do you, or have you, ever realized that you complain about the very thing you do?

The one difference is, you've assigned yourself the mantle of saving all Comodo users from themselves.

You whine because someone was told to use Comodo by a person who is clearly not an expert by your standard although you call them such above. Then you proceed to tell people NOT to use Comodo because you know what's best for all of us Comodo users. You must have some hellcacious arguments with yourself in the mirror each morning.

 

[Trident]

Then you proceed to tell people NOT to use Comodo because you know what's best for all of us Comodo users.

The user is complaining that the software caused serious issues. Nobody told them to NOT use Comodo. Prior to complaining, please find a post where someone said “do not use Comodo, use X Y Z instead”.

person who is clearly not an expert

It’s not one user, it is a whole group of users. In fact, @Behold Eck did not directly advise anyone to use Comodo. It is other people that constantly do that.
But it is wrong to call the user troll, although, as I said on this discussion already more than 10 times, all advise is followed at the user’s own risk. People on the internet can advise you to consume laundry pods as well (which happened). Whether you will do that, ultimately, is your own decision.

The one difference is, you've assigned yourself the mantle of saving all Comodo users from themselves.

I am not saving anyone from Comodo, that as well was said many times in this discussion.
The software is not something evil that people need saving from — it is a free product, offered on as-is basis. You don’t like it - don’t use it.
The software fans are vicious.

If people wanna use Comodo, then this is up to them. They can use NetProtect Antivirus as well, as long as this mediocre software with 250MB of hashes-only database (not even encryped) works for them.

I don’t like the attacks on users who complain.
We are unable to get a clear picture of Comodo, because every time someone says something, a whole group of people jumps to invalidate all arguments.

This has been going on for very long, it’s not from now.

 

[tofargone]

You must have some hellcacious arguments with yourself in the mirror each morning.

LOL Sorry Trident, but Chuck is funny...