New Update CIS 2025 is now LIVE!

rashmi

Level 12
Thread author
Jan 15, 2024
578
There are many discussions about Comodo on MalwareTips. You can check the comments to decide who to follow regarding Comodo. I believe Comodo is a default-deny setup with whitelisting and containment capabilities. It is not ideal for average users, but it is not too complex either. Average users can use it with a basic understanding of its features or with an expert to manage it. There may be some bugs, but Comodo defaults or CS config users should not have usability or security issues. I have tested and used various security software and have encountered problems like uninstallation issues, high false positives, system slowdowns, inconsistent blocking by behavior blockers, unbootable systems, and improper malware blocking. I have been a long-time user of Comodo and Kaspersky. Despite users posting bugs or problems on Kaspersky forums, I have encountered no issues with our usage. Comodo is not more dangerous than any other security software available.
 

rashmi

Level 12
Thread author
Jan 15, 2024
578
So you are claiming that I am incompetent, and have broken the software, by deleting the vendor list, which looked like it came right out of the CCP.

I would suggest changing the vendor list does nothing to brake comodo, this is similar to me calling you an idiot for changing something in notepad.
I included "seems" because I'm uncertain about your familiarity with Comodo. Why would I assume you are inherently incompetent? Regardless, your posts show a lack of familiarity with Comodo. Your comparison, to put it bluntly, is just plain dumb!
 

Helmut

Level 1
Jun 6, 2024
26
Not necessarily, it’s all down to your habits. Some people can be safe even without AV for years, others install various programs and activate various doohickeys and still end up infected, often silently.



So in my case, they have been hiding for 15-20 years and have not shown up yet.:oops:

The user is telling you that the software did not work for them — that’s it. Period.
The same I told, too. Where is the difference? No, that won't work with the argument.
that:
1. Comodo is an abandonware (at least since 2017);
2. The "new" CIS 2025 is a fraud, it has nothing new, the software has been the same for at least 7 years (no real updates nor real upgrades);
3. The list of old and dangerous bugs is endless (at Comodo's website at least 100 bugs are officially recognized, and more than 300 bugs are unofficially recognized);
4. Comodo's antivirus was, is and will always be garbage. Therefore, Comodo does not detect viruses nor malware;
5. The only thing that (more or less) works in Comodo is the "Containment", therefore, Comodo is only a "blocker"... and the decision to block or not to block depends on the user.
A garbage, full of bugs, not detecting viruses or malware (right with antivirus, but I am telling of CIS), only blocker - I couldn't work with comode, mit PCs, Laptops for more then 20 years full of ransamware, viruses, worms, rootkits. My and other data are to be sold in the darknet, my bank account was always emptied - and I -And I - I dummy didn't notice anything - til up to this moment. From today on I'm pulling the plug and only going for walks.
Not accepting the truth of the facts is denying reality, and that defines FANATICISM. And I repeat, it is not about "putting Comodo in a bad light", it is about fighting the intolerance and irresponsibility of fanaticism, which is not satisfied with using Comodo, it has a pathological compulsion to put Comodo up everyone's ass. The threads about Comodo have nothing to do with Comodo or security software... they only have to do with fanaticism and the intolerance and irresponsibility of fanaticism.
What else can I say: Comodo has protected my PC from intruders to this day - where is the fanaticism in that? Fanaticism is ignoring something like that and simply claiming that this software is useless and dangerous. That is fanaticism for me. Where is the fanaticism when I say that I have been spared from malware to this day? Would you prefer if I switched to whatever based on your post? ME, or rather my PC, has remained clean since I followed what the aforementioned computer scientist taught me, and I trust him much more than some forum user here is euphorically trying to force on me (in the opposite sense). That's it for me, there's nothing more to say.
Oh yes, I have set many of my own rules in comodo and comodo doesn't complain and my PC still stays clean. All my programs also work without any problems and once more:
I work(ed) with
- all windows version
- completely different programs
- very personal data of many people
- online banking of course
- tax office (tax returns)
- Medical bills
a.s.o.
and everything under the protective cloak of comodo so don't tell me that Comodo is garbage, crap, dangerous from fanatical opponents.

That's just my experience, why should I try to force software on others? Everyone can do what they think is right and that's what I'm doing here, no more and no less (I only answer of some postings - fanatic ones), and let fanatics, euphorics and paranoids try to force this on them - the other way round is also true. I only answer some postings - including fanatical ones. Bye!
 
Last edited:

overdivine

Level 2
Verified
Aug 21, 2013
90
.. it is totally ridiculous to insist on security strategies based on “blocking”, “deny all” blah blah blah blah.
whitelisting is and will still be one of the most efficient "strategy" at blocking malware
it works perfect everywhere, at government levels, in security agencies, in industry, and it works the same for all type of users
give it time until smart app control will be turned on by default on all windows systems
 

Decopi

Level 8
Verified
Oct 29, 2017
361
whitelisting is and will still be one of the most efficient "strategy" at blocking malware
it works perfect everywhere, at government levels, in security agencies, in industry, and it works the same for all type of users
give it time until smart app control will be turned on by default on all windows systems

Blocking, Whitelisting, Deny-all and similar, should only be used as a security layer, never as a "complete and absolutely unbeatable security system" (as Comodo advertises on its webpage, and as its fans promote it).

Even Smart App Control is designed as a security layer, never to replace Windows Defender.
 
  • +Reputation
Reactions: Trident

bazang

Level 8
Jul 3, 2024
367
My question is, if Comodo cared about the product and reputation, they would have improved by now.
It is a free product with $0 revenue. The product owner spends what he sees fit to spend on the product. The fact that you and others disagree does not matter. Melih is not obligated to do anything more than he has already done.

It makes no sense to expend resources on any product that is completely free.

A 5 year old child understands this common sense idea.

15 years ago "Containment" had some functional benefit, because not all antivirus/antimalware had modules to detect zero-day attacks and similar.
Really? Then why does Microsoft aggressively sell its VDI? VDI is virtualization. It does not matter if it is whole system or isolated application environment, both are "containment." Containment is used extensively in enterprise and government, particularly when involving regulated, sensitive data. Just last month we closed-out a $37 million project that included "containment." So you obviously do not know what you're talking about.

I get that some people cannot cope with software bugs, but the Comodo and @cruelsister bashing campaign that has been initiated by two people - @Decopi and @Trident - and it is unhinged.

I personally could care less about Comodo. If people want to use it and are fanbois or fangirlz, and it makes them happy, then good for them. On the other hand the fact that two people on this forum are so butthurt about Comodo and its bugs, and spend half their time derailing every Comodo discussion is pathetic. Why do you two care so much about others' software choices?

When you get something for free, if you have high expectations then you are the problem - and not the party giving the free product or the quality of the product itself. If it is free nobody has any right to complain. That is "The Rule of Free."

When someone gives you 2 pennies for free and you complain that you cannot do anything with the 2 pennies, it does not matter. You were still given something for free. If you do not like the quality, performance, amount, or however you want to measure what you have been given, again it does not matter. It was given to you at $0 cost. People that give things away for free owe nobody anything.
 
Last edited:
  • Applause
  • +Reputation
Reactions: rashmi and kylprq

Trident

Level 34
Verified
Top Poster
Well-known
Feb 7, 2023
2,349
The same I told, too. Where is the difference? No, that won't work with the argument.
Don’t worry, neither will your books. You will have more luck at the local library, where you can start “Pre-bedtime Stories with Helmut”.

Anyway, glad to see you had good experience with Comodo.
 
  • Love
Reactions: Decopi

New_Style_xd

Level 1
Sep 10, 2022
16
Hello everyone, I’m here to share this information about COMODO.
Since it has not been tested by AV-COMPARATIVES and AV-TEST, we can see that COMODO performed well in AVLAB once again.
Hugs to all.

 

Trident

Level 34
Verified
Top Poster
Well-known
Feb 7, 2023
2,349
It makes no sense to expend resources on any product that is completely free.
We've heard that. You are one of the two-three people on here whose vinyl needs changing.
I heard you hear and a half ago.
I'd think for this time you may change and you have, your tone is softer this time, but you still got lessons to learn.
Why do you two care so much about others' software choices?
I don't. I accept your argument that the software is free and its iffy quality is widely known. People choose to use it at their own risk.
I don't agree with implying that people are stupid when they report the same aforementioned iffy quality.
This was my problem in our previous arguments and will always be my problem.

You were still given something for free
I don't want this freebie. It is sad when people are trying to shove it in everyone's face.

we closed-out a $37 million project
So where is our drink???

Last but not least, Comodo discussions are powerful magnet often for incredibly bright and powerful forum members. Below is an exemplary of Comodo fanbase - quality software with quality supporters.

COMODO - Creating entertainment online. Don’t pretend this is not why you are here.
1723868176512.png
1723868248095.png
1723868370977.png
1723868653540.png
 
Last edited:
  • Love
Reactions: Decopi

Digmor Crusher

Level 25
Verified
Top Poster
Well-known
Jan 27, 2018
1,435
So in my case, they have been hiding for 15-20 years and have not shown up yet.:oops:


The same I told, too. Where is the difference? No, that won't work with the argument.

A garbage, full of bugs, not detecting viruses or malware (right with antivirus, but I am telling of CIS), only blocker - I couldn't work with comode, mit PCs, Laptops for more then 20 years full of ransamware, viruses, worms, rootkits. My and other data are to be sold in the darknet, my bank account was always emptied - and I -And I - I dummy didn't notice anything - til up to this moment. From today on I'm pulling the plug and only going for walks.

What else can I say: Comodo has protected my PC from intruders to this day - where is the fanaticism in that? Fanaticism is ignoring something like that and simply claiming that this software is useless and dangerous. That is fanaticism for me. Where is the fanaticism when I say that I have been spared from malware to this day? Would you prefer if I switched to whatever based on your post? ME, or rather my PC, has remained clean since I followed what the aforementioned computer scientist taught me, and I trust him much more than some forum user here is euphorically trying to force on me (in the opposite sense). That's it for me, there's nothing more to say.
Oh yes, I have set many of my own rules in comodo and comodo doesn't complain and my PC still stays clean. All my programs also work without any problems and once more:
I work(ed) with
- all windows version
- completely different programs
- very personal data of many people
- online banking of course
- tax office (tax returns)
- Medical bills
a.s.o.
and everything under the protective cloak of comodo so don't tell me that Comodo is garbage, crap, dangerous from fanatical opponents.

That's just my experience, why should I try to force software on others? Everyone can do what they think is right and that's what I'm doing here, no more and no less (I only answer of some postings - fanatic ones), and let fanatics, euphorics and paranoids try to force this on them - the other way round is also true. I only answer some postings - including fanatical ones. Bye!
Just because someone says that they use and like Comodo it doesn't mean that they are a rabid fanboy.
 

Digmor Crusher

Level 25
Verified
Top Poster
Well-known
Jan 27, 2018
1,435
Blocking, Whitelisting, Deny-all and similar, should only be used as a security layer, never as a "complete and absolutely unbeatable security system" (as Comodo advertises on its webpage, and as its fans promote it).

Even Smart App Control is designed as a security layer, never to replace Windows Defender.
People that keep bashing Comodo relentlessly are just the opposite of a rabid Comodo fanboy. No?
 

Jan Willy

Level 13
Verified
Top Poster
Well-known
Jul 5, 2019
607
Hello everyone, I’m here to share this information about COMODO.
Since it has not been tested by AV-COMPARATIVES and AV-TEST, we can see that COMODO performed well in AVLAB once again.
Hugs to all.

Any discussion is redundant now. Everyone can calm down and focus on more important issues. ;)
 

rashmi

Level 12
Thread author
Jan 15, 2024
578
Hello everyone, I’m here to share this information about COMODO.
Since it has not been tested by AV-COMPARATIVES and AV-TEST, we can see that COMODO performed well in AVLAB once again.
Hugs to all.

Talk about standing out from the crowd! 😊 All the products were left in the dust with a 0% failure rate, except for Comodo, which aced it with a flawless 100% detection rate! 😄
 

Helmut

Level 1
Jun 6, 2024
26
Talk about standing out from the crowd! 😊 All the products were left in the dust with a 0% failure rate, except for Comodo, which aced it with a flawless 100% detection rate! 😄
Sorry, it's only a Pre-bedtime Story:devilish: - but it's not my story.

You can see what nonsense some fanatics against this software write. That's why I was and always will be 100% protected - but it's just a bed story of mine. Maybe AV-LAB only tells bed stories. Probably!
Next bedtime-story will follow after this posting or a "funny" interlude to sugarcoat everything.
Therefore my PC was all the time protected to 100% - there is not more to say. Actually, I just wanted to post this video as a bedtime story. A video by cruelsister - worth watching:

 
Last edited:

Trident

Level 34
Verified
Top Poster
Well-known
Feb 7, 2023
2,349
Maybe AV-LAB only tells bed stories
Considering all the tested products, for quite some time have been getting a perfect 100%, albeit not exactly bedtime story (like yours, and boring one I must say), it becomes a rather "nothing to see there" story According to AV-LAB which pro-fanatics have mentioned (I did not), I will be 100% protected with everything, from McAfee, to Webroot, to Comodo. Comodo is not in any way superior. So your "story" wouldn't have changed, with Comodo or without.

Now I suggest you don't waste anymore time and energy, on this forum, you will not convince more than 5 people in your fairytales.

On another thread, MalwareTips users voted and majority of them stated that they don't care about Comodo.

I am also flattered, seems like my posts are the ones that grabbed your heart, you ignore everything else and reply just to me.

P.S. I don't think you read that one right:
Talk about standing out from the crowd! 😊 All the products were left in the dust with a 0% failure rate, except for Comodo, which aced it with a flawless 100% detection rate! 😄
You didn't get the sarcasm.
 
Last edited:

Decopi

Level 8
Verified
Oct 29, 2017
361
The web is full of mostly NEGATIVE reviews and analysis confirming that Comodo = Garbage. Only blind fanatics don't see the reality... a mix of mental pathology with ignorance, irresponsibility and immorality:

"For many years, Comodo made regular appearances in test reports from AV-Test Institute. The best possible score from this lab is 18 points, six apiece for protection, performance, and usability. Comodo generally scored on the low side, coming in as low as 12.5 and averaging about 15 points. The best products routinely hit 18 points, or at least 17.5. In any case, Comodo hasn't chosen to participate with this lab's testing since 2019.

One lab that has reported on Comodo recently is London-based SE Labs, whose researchers use a capture-and-replay technique to hit a collection of antivirus utilities with precisely the same real-world malware attacks. Each antivirus can earn certification at five levels: AAA, AA, A, B, and C. For the last couple of years, Comodo has regularly attained AA certification (Decopi' comment: AA is incredible mediocre!... because AAA certification made up 84% of the ratings, therefore Comodo performance is below 84% of all security software market tests. It's also important to mention that there is no meaningful lab test result if it doesn't include 12 months in a row.)"
___________________________________________________________________________

Katarina Glamoslija (Lead Cybersecurity Editor), May 30, 2024:

Honestly, I struggle to recommend Comodo right now — there are just too many things wrong with it. There are much better free options out there.

Comodo doesn’t detect malware as effectively as top antivirus competitors.

Comodo’s other features aren’t any good, though. Since Comodo hasn’t had a decent update since 2021, the anti-phishing, secure browser, and ad blocker all underperform.

Also, Comodo used to offer a VPN and cloud storage on its paid plan, but these have been discontinued, leaving only 24/7 tech support and a virus-guarantee as its paid-for features — making Comodo’s paid plans one of the worst-value offers on the market.

Although all of Comodo’s core security features are free, you’re better off looking at other options if you want decent protection. Avira is our top free antivirus in 2024, and Norton is our top pick for a full-featured paid internet security suite.

Comodo’s scanner isn’t the best on the market, by a long shot. You can’t fully rely on the Quick Scan, and the Full Scan’s detection rates aren’t as good as other competitors. If you want a free antivirus with a reliable scanner, you’re better off getting Bitdefender’s free package instead, which has one of the best malware scanners around.

Comodo’s real-time scanner is okay, but it’s not nearly as good as the best antivirus programs in 2024.

Comodo’s anti-phishing feature is disappointing. It doesn’t work as well as Chrome’s default protections and lacks compatibility with most web browsers. If you’re worried about phishing attacks, you’re better off using Norton or McAfee (or even just sticking with Chrome’s default protections).

Comodo’s Virtual Desktop is definitely aimed at more advanced users. Your average everyday user only really needs a secure antivirus program, which will automatically detect and block all malware files on their system without requiring an additional testing step.

Can Comodo Protect All of Your Devices in 2024? In a word — no. Comodo is not a good antivirus in 2024, especially when compared to top competitors.

Firstly, Comodo no longer supports macOS or Linux, and its iOS app is extremely limited, so Comodo is only really worth considering for Windows and Android users — despite Comodo’s own website suggesting otherwise.

Comodo’s antivirus scanner isn’t as good as any of those on our top 10 antiviruses in 2024 list, its anti-phishing feature is poor, and most of its additional features are also not very good.

Comodo’s developers have also abandoned many of its other features — namely the cloud storage and VPN. None of these features work in 2024, yet are still mentioned all over its website. The ones that haven’t been outright left behind haven’t seen a significant upgrade in several years, making them fall behind modern standards.

Overall, I really wouldn’t recommend Comodo. Its free plan is simply not as good as others available, and its paid plan is definitely not worth the money.
___________________________________________________________________________

Tibor Moes, Founder & Chief Editor at SoftwareLab, January 2024
Tibor Moes studied Cybersecurity at Stanford.

We Tested 28 Brands, Comodo is ranked #28 of the 28 (last place).

Comodo offers a broad range of features, but disappointingly, many underperform. Its virus scanner only found 93% of the malware samples, which is below average.

Comodo’s additional features like phishing protection, secure browser, and ad blocker fail to meet expectations. Plus, it still promotes the non-existent cloud backup and VPN features.

On top of that, Comodo does not participate in the independent tests by AV-Test, which is not a good sign.
___________________________________________________________________________

Published by Neil J. Rubenking, Lead Analyst for Security, July 17, 2024:

Cons (results Comodo's tests):
- Failed against several ransomware samples
- Poor to dismal scores in our hands-on tests
- Advanced features too technical for many users
- Independent lab test results sparse

"For many years, Comodo made regular appearances in test reports from AV-Test Institute. The best possible score from this lab is 18 points, six apiece for protection, performance, and usability. Comodo generally scored on the low side, coming in as low as 12.5 and averaging about 15 points. The best products routinely hit 18 points, or at least 17.5. In any case, Comodo hasn't chosen to participate with this lab's testing since 2019.

One lab that has reported on Comodo recently is London-based SE Labs, whose researchers use a capture-and-replay technique to hit a collection of antivirus utilities with precisely the same real-world malware attacks. Each antivirus can earn certification at five levels: AAA, AA, A, B, and C. For the last couple of years, Comodo has regularly attained AA certification (Decopi' comment: AA is incredible mediocre!... because AAA certification made up 84% of the ratings, therefore Comodo performance is below 84% of all security software market tests. It's also important to mention that there is no meaningful lab test result if it doesn't include 12 months in a row.)"

Its features are quite buggy, its design is a bit outdated, and it spots lots of false positives, which makes me question its level of security.
Many features don’t work well.
Gets incomplete third-party test scores
Signs of potentially shoddy coding.
Apps looks and feel outdated.
Incorrectly marks legitimate files as malware.

Independent antivirus test labs frequently compare antivirus programs. Comodo is not one of the most popular antivirus suites, so test results for it are few and far between. PC Magazine found that Comodo handled hand-modified ransomware samples poorly. This tells you that its heuristics engine isn’t quite up to snuff. Advanced or customized threats might slip through the cracks.
In my testing, I found that it incorrectly identified Lavasoft Web Companion as malware. Additionally, it appeared to terminate its own components as if they were malware, casting doubt on its effectiveness.

While Comodo Antivirus is available for the low price of free, it does not compete very well with other options, especially the ones mentioned on our best antivirus list.
Throughout my testing of Comodo Internet Security, I found lots of red flags. Components didn’t install correctly. Features like the task manager don’t work. The Linux version may not have been updated since 2013. Scanning occurred even when the software was disabled, locking up my computer.
Most importantly, few independent security labs have evaluated its performance. This means that your device’s security might not be up to date while the program functions as your main antivirus and antimalware solution.
If you’re looking to protect your computer from a wide range of real-world threats, other options may be a better choice.

With just one lab test score available, my hands-on testing results become especially important. To start my malware protection testing, I open a folder containing malware samples that I've collected and analyzed myself. Comodo immediately started wiping out the samples it recognized, quickly eliminating 44% of them. That’s low for on-sight detection. Tested with this same set of samples, Norton AntiVirus Plus eliminated 73% on sight and Bitdefender Antivirus Plus nabbed 72%. When Comodo recognized and deleted a sample, it reported “Malware Stopped” even though the malware never started.
Continuing the test, I launched each sample that wasn't wiped out in the initial culling. For unrecognized programs it offered a choice: run the program in the sandbox container system (more about that system below); run the program with no limitations; or block all execution. Since it did not identify those programs as malicious, just unrecognized, I chose the container option. Other reactions included: running in the container without asking; blocking programs from launching; catching malware activities after the initial launch; and totally whiffing on malware detection.
My analysis tools revealed installation of anywhere from two to 50 malware-related executable files by those samples. In each case, I dug into advanced settings and reset the container, discarding its contents. And in each case doing so made no difference—the executable files remained.
One way or another, Comodo detected 78% of the samples, the lowest detection rate among recent programs. If it had perfectly blocked installation of all detected threats, it could have parlayed that into 7.8 of 10 possible points. As noted, I found that some detected malware still planted some executable files on the system, and some of those were even running. Those slip-ups dragged its score down to a dismal 7.0 points.
Tested with the same set of samples, Aura, Avast, AVG AntiVirus Free, Malwarebytes Premium Security, and Norton reached 99% detection. Avast and AVG managed 9.9 of 10 possible points. Looking at antivirus apps tested with earlier malware collections, only a handful have scored lower than Comodo.
Out of 100 verified malware-hosting URLs, Comodo Online Security blocked exactly two, despite the promise that it “instantly blocks dangerous and fraudulent websites”. Comodo did eliminate some malware immediately after download, but still missed quite a few. In all, Comodo protected against 63% of the malware downloads, only two recent antivirus programs have scored lower in this test. At the other end of the spectrum, Bitdefender, Guardio, Sophos Home, Trend Micro Antivirus+ Security, and ZoneAlarm Free Antivirus all scored a perfect 100%.
Subpar Ransomware Protection: Comodo doesn’t include a layer of protection specific to ransomware. My collection includes a dozen ransomware samples and a couple that are ransomware-adjacent. All the other antivirus tools I’ve tested recently either wiped these out on sight or eliminated them before they could launch. I was surprised to discover that Comodo only wiped out five of those on sight. On the plus side, that left me with nine ransomware samples for testing. I launched each surviving sample and noted just what happened. Comodo caught five more samples at this stage. Two of the remaining four completely eluded Comodo’s detection. One wiped the (virtual) hard drive of the test system. The other encrypted about 3,500 files, including everything in the Documents folder, and displayed its ransom note. Again, Comodo doesn’t build in protection specific to ransomware. With two samples totally missed and one caught but not completely, it exhibited partial protection in my test. The containment system did its job, to a point, but failed to contain all the ransomware activity. For comparison, competitors including Bitdefender and Norton managed to foil all or most of the same samples with regular real-time antivirus components turned off, relying strictly on their respective ransomware-fighting components.

Features like KillSwitch, HIPS, and the sandbox containment system might make Comodo Free Antivirus attractive to techies, but those same techies will be put off by its poor showing in tests and its continued lack of progress over time. One independent lab gives it a decent rating, but its scores in our hands-on testing range from poor to dismal.
The Bottom Line: Comodo Free Antivirus includes many high-end bonus features, but independent antivirus testing labs have little to say about it, and it fares poorly in our own hands-on tests.
___________________________________________________________________________
 
  • Like
  • +Reputation
Reactions: roger_m and Trident

Trident

Level 34
Verified
Top Poster
Well-known
Feb 7, 2023
2,349
KillSwitch
This for the techies does nothing honestly, for more than 15 years I’ve been using task manager and I can see everything there, because I know what to expect from a non-infected system.
It’s been claimed by more than one user here that this should stay off.
sandbox containment
Seems like on Neil Rubenking’s fairly unsophisticated test, nailed by most vendors, the containment did not turn out to be the panacea it is proclaimed to be.
 

franz

Level 9
Verified
Well-known
May 29, 2021
433
I am in no position to say that Comodo is bad or good, but since nothing is 100% secure, this discussion reminds me of another hypothetical situation put forward. Put 20 men and women in a room, let them choose their partner freely, and I think the choices will be as different or the same as the views on most things, even on programs. Some will not like their partner after a while, others may like them very much. I think we humans are different and who or what we like will probably be just as different. This is what makes us and flowers beautiful:love:
 

About us

  • MalwareTips is a community-driven platform providing the latest information and resources on malware and cyber threats. Our team of experienced professionals and passionate volunteers work to keep the internet safe and secure. We provide accurate, up-to-date information and strive to build a strong and supportive community dedicated to cybersecurity.

User Menu

Follow us

Follow us on Facebook or Twitter to know first about the latest cybersecurity incidents and malware threats.

Top