New Update CIS 2025 is now LIVE!

[New_Style_xd]

Hello everyone, I’m here to share this information about COMODO.
Since it has not been tested by AV-COMPARATIVES and AV-TEST, we can see that COMODO performed well in AVLAB once again.
Hugs to all.

Recent Results » AVLab Cybersecurity Foundation

The latest results of the Advanced In-The-Wild-Malware Test, in which we regularly evaluate software designed to protect devices.

avlab.pl

 

[rashmi]

LOL...I'm so glad I use F-Secure, so peaceful , no drama or malware. Back to watching YouTube videos and cleaning the house

Well... the menacing "F" is a chilling symbol of retribution that strikes terror into the hearts of those who create chaos and spread harmful viruses!

 

[Trident]

It makes no sense to expend resources on any product that is completely free.

We've heard that. You are one of the two-three people on here whose vinyl needs changing.
I heard you hear and a half ago.
I'd think for this time you may change and you have, your tone is softer this time, but you still got lessons to learn.

Why do you two care so much about others' software choices?

I don't. I accept your argument that the software is free and its iffy quality is widely known. People choose to use it at their own risk.
I don't agree with implying that people are stupid when they report the same aforementioned iffy quality.
This was my problem in our previous arguments and will always be my problem.

You were still given something for free

I don't want this freebie. It is sad when people are trying to shove it in everyone's face.

we closed-out a $37 million project

So where is our drink???

Last but not least, Comodo discussions are powerful magnet often for incredibly bright and powerful forum members. Below is an exemplary of Comodo fanbase - quality software with quality supporters.

COMODO - Creating entertainment online. Don’t pretend this is not why you are here.

 

[Digmor Crusher]

So in my case, they have been hiding for 15-20 years and have not shown up yet.


The same I told, too. Where is the difference? No, that won't work with the argument.

A garbage, full of bugs, not detecting viruses or malware (right with antivirus, but I am telling of CIS), only blocker - I couldn't work with comode, mit PCs, Laptops for more then 20 years full of ransamware, viruses, worms, rootkits. My and other data are to be sold in the darknet, my bank account was always emptied - and I -And I - I dummy didn't notice anything - til up to this moment. From today on I'm pulling the plug and only going for walks.

What else can I say: Comodo has protected my PC from intruders to this day - where is the fanaticism in that? Fanaticism is ignoring something like that and simply claiming that this software is useless and dangerous. That is fanaticism for me. Where is the fanaticism when I say that I have been spared from malware to this day? Would you prefer if I switched to whatever based on your post? ME, or rather my PC, has remained clean since I followed what the aforementioned computer scientist taught me, and I trust him much more than some forum user here is euphorically trying to force on me (in the opposite sense). That's it for me, there's nothing more to say.
Oh yes, I have set many of my own rules in comodo and comodo doesn't complain and my PC still stays clean. All my programs also work without any problems and once more:
I work(ed) with
- all windows version
- completely different programs
- very personal data of many people
- online banking of course
- tax office (tax returns)
- Medical bills
a.s.o.
and everything under the protective cloak of comodo so don't tell me that Comodo is garbage, crap, dangerous from fanatical opponents.

That's just my experience, why should I try to force software on others? Everyone can do what they think is right and that's what I'm doing here, no more and no less (I only answer of some postings - fanatic ones), and let fanatics, euphorics and paranoids try to force this on them - the other way round is also true. I only answer some postings - including fanatical ones. Bye!

Just because someone says that they use and like Comodo it doesn't mean that they are a rabid fanboy.

 

[Digmor Crusher]

Blocking, Whitelisting, Deny-all and similar, should only be used as a security layer, never as a "complete and absolutely unbeatable security system" (as Comodo advertises on its webpage, and as its fans promote it).

Even Smart App Control is designed as a security layer, never to replace Windows Defender.

People that keep bashing Comodo relentlessly are just the opposite of a rabid Comodo fanboy. No?

 

[Jan Willy]

Hello everyone, I’m here to share this information about COMODO.
Since it has not been tested by AV-COMPARATIVES and AV-TEST, we can see that COMODO performed well in AVLAB once again.
Hugs to all.

Recent Results » AVLab Cybersecurity Foundation

The latest results of the Advanced In-The-Wild-Malware Test, in which we regularly evaluate software designed to protect devices.

avlab.pl

Any discussion is redundant now. Everyone can calm down and focus on more important issues.

 

[rashmi]

Hello everyone, I’m here to share this information about COMODO.
Since it has not been tested by AV-COMPARATIVES and AV-TEST, we can see that COMODO performed well in AVLAB once again.
Hugs to all.

Recent Results » AVLab Cybersecurity Foundation

The latest results of the Advanced In-The-Wild-Malware Test, in which we regularly evaluate software designed to protect devices.

avlab.pl

Talk about standing out from the crowd! All the products were left in the dust with a 0% failure rate, except for Comodo, which aced it with a flawless 100% detection rate!

 

[Helmut]

Talk about standing out from the crowd! All the products were left in the dust with a 0% failure rate, except for Comodo, which aced it with a flawless 100% detection rate!

Sorry, it's only a Pre-bedtime Story - but it's not my story.

You can see what nonsense some fanatics against this software write. That's why I was and always will be 100% protected - but it's just a bed story of mine. Maybe AV-LAB only tells bed stories. Probably!
Next bedtime-story will follow after this posting or a "funny" interlude to sugarcoat everything.
Therefore my PC was all the time protected to 100% - there is not more to say. Actually, I just wanted to post this video as a bedtime story. A video by cruelsister - worth watching:

Comodo Internet Security 2025 Beta / Final / Infos Thread

I believe this Intel TDT feature is mostly a gimmick and works only with Intel vPro CPU's. According to SE LABS test, it works 6th gen intel or better...

www.wilderssecurity.com

 

[Trident]

Maybe AV-LAB only tells bed stories

Considering all the tested products, for quite some time have been getting a perfect 100%, albeit not exactly bedtime story (like yours, and boring one I must say), it becomes a rather "nothing to see there" story According to AV-LAB which pro-fanatics have mentioned (I did not), I will be 100% protected with everything, from McAfee, to Webroot, to Comodo. Comodo is not in any way superior. So your "story" wouldn't have changed, with Comodo or without.

Now I suggest you don't waste anymore time and energy, on this forum, you will not convince more than 5 people in your fairytales.

On another thread, MalwareTips users voted and majority of them stated that they don't care about Comodo.

I am also flattered, seems like my posts are the ones that grabbed your heart, you ignore everything else and reply just to me.

P.S. I don't think you read that one right:

Talk about standing out from the crowd! All the products were left in the dust with a 0% failure rate, except for Comodo, which aced it with a flawless 100% detection rate!

You didn't get the sarcasm.

 

[Helmut]

Well roared, lion! No, just only roared, not more!

 

[Trident]

KillSwitch

This for the techies does nothing honestly, for more than 15 years I’ve been using task manager and I can see everything there, because I know what to expect from a non-infected system.

HIPS

It’s been claimed by more than one user here that this should stay off.

sandbox containment

Seems like on Neil Rubenking’s fairly unsophisticated test, nailed by most vendors, the containment did not turn out to be the panacea it is proclaimed to be.

 

[franz]

I am in no position to say that Comodo is bad or good, but since nothing is 100% secure, this discussion reminds me of another hypothetical situation put forward. Put 20 men and women in a room, let them choose their partner freely, and I think the choices will be as different or the same as the views on most things, even on programs. Some will not like their partner after a while, others may like them very much. I think we humans are different and who or what we like will probably be just as different. This is what makes us and flowers beautiful

 

[Kiss]

I still don't know how Comodo didn't close its doors, with all due respect to those who like it and use it, but it's unnecessary in today's world, any reasonable antivirus is far superior to it. You have top free ones, Avast, Kaspersky, Bitdefender, Microsoft Defender. Paid, Norton, Trend Micro, GDATA, ESET, F-Secure. Even if it were the only option I would NEVER recommend Comodo, besides being full of bugs, its protection is mediocre

 

[mlnevese]

I love how everybody gets 100% in these tests. Nobody's feelings get hurt!

 

[Chuck57]

Same old crowd, same old complaints about a software they don't like thus none of us should like. I've used Comodo, as I've said in other threads, since v3 or v4, I don't recall whether that was with Win 95 or 98. It's always worked fine and protected my various desktops or laptops.

Contrary to some, I just use it. I don't play with it. I neither write rules nor delete rules or anything else. Comodo works best when set up, Proactive Defense and CS settings, or just proactive. Then, leave it alone and let it do its job.

Some of the naysayers seem intent on blaming Comodo for problems created by the many people who just can't resist tinkering. These naysayers then point to Comodo and blame them - for failutes caused by people not understanding that, with Comodo, you don't need to play with it.

That's akin to me buying a new pistol and shooting myself in the leg because I filed the trigger sear instead shooting it smooth, then having anti gun types try to blame Smith and Wesson for what I did.

 

[tofargone]

I love how everybody gets 100% in these tests. Nobody's feelings get hurt!

yea can't have that...Not in this day and age. Wonder what the Bot thinks of that?

 

[Trident]

I love how everybody gets 100% in these tests. Nobody's feelings get hurt!

But per the information in this test (which once again, was brought by the Comodo fanboys, not by me), Comodo is still rock bottom:

• McAfee blocked much more malware in pre-execution stage (which is always better), with 0 tweaks. The so-called dwell time (on the test listed as reaction time) was 2 seconds
• Kaspersky had even lower dwell time than McAfee, still blocking the same 98.91% malware pre-execution
• Bitdefender blocked 99.27% pre-execution with <1 sec dwell time.
• Mediocre solutions like Panda, also available for free, still did better. 86.18% pre-execution detection and 27.6 sec dwell time.

Comodo, despite achieving the same protection level, blocked merely 36% pre-execution and had over a minute dwell time.
So even on a test where everyone gets 100% score, Comodo still comes down at the bottom. The only product worse than Comodo is Xcitium, blocking 3% malware in pre-execution phase, which is the lowest.

In conclusion, other products deliver the same prevention, with far quicker reaction times and block malware way earlier in its lifecycle.

 

[Behold Eck]

You don't need to edit, just don't do it in the future

Too late but I`ll really try not to do it again

Regards Eck

 

[Behold Eck]

But per the information in this test (which once again, was brought by the Comodo fanboys, not by me), Comodo is still rock bottom:

• McAfee blocked much more malware in pre-execution stage (which is always better), with 0 tweaks. The so-called dwell time (on the test listed as reaction time) was 2 seconds
• Kaspersky had even lower dwell time than McAfee, still blocking the same 98.91% malware pre-execution
• Bitdefender blocked 99.27% pre-execution with <1 sec dwell time.
• Mediocre solutions like Panda, also available for free, still did better. 86.18% pre-execution detection and 27.6 sec dwell time.

Comodo, despite achieving the same protection level, blocked merely 36% pre-execution and had over a minute dwell time.
So even on a test where everyone gets 100% score, Comodo still comes down at the bottom. The only product worse than Comodo is Xcitium, blocking 3% malware in pre-execution phase, which is the lowest.

In conclusion, other products deliver the same prevention, with far quicker reaction times and block malware way earlier in its lifecycle.

Eset completely missed one and Emsisoft`s "dwell time" was over a minute and a half.

100% is 100% so Comodo is rock solid what ever way you want to look at it.

Regards Eck

 

[Trident]

Eset completely missed one and Emsisoft`s "dwell time" was over a minute and a half.

Well I’ve always said that Eset is not amazing, which has caused members to attack me. Is it fair to say that we’ve got evidence for this now? Or am I “making Eset look bad”?